Scientists debate the accuracy of Al Gore's documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth'

There is no question that Al Gore’s 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth is a powerful example of how scientific knowledge can be communicated to a lay audience. What is up for debate is whether it accurately presents the scientific argument that global warming is caused by human activities. Climate change experts express their opinions on the scientific validity of the film’s claims in articles just published online in Springer’s journal, GeoJournal.

If you want to include this story in your blog, copy and paste this formatted text:

<p><a href="http://www.physorg.com/news127400413.html">Scientists debate the accuracy of Al Gore's documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth'</a></p> <p>There is no question that Al Gore’s 2006 documentary <i>An Inconvenient Truth</i> is a powerful example of how scientific knowledge can be communicated to a lay audience. What is up for debate is whether it accurately presents the scientific argument that global warming is caused by human activities. Climate change experts express their opinions on the scientific validity of the film’s claims in articles just published online in Springer’s journal, GeoJournal.</p>