Do pre-conceived expectations impact doctor analysis of X-rays?

Do pre-conceived expectations impact on doctor analysis of X-rays?
The researchers tested the radiologists' accuracy in detecting lung cancer in chest X-rays.

Scientists have long suspected that clinicians' ability to read X-rays can be skewed according to what they expect to find, but a University of Sydney study published this month in the international journal Radiology did not find evidence to support this theory.

Lead author Warren Reed from the Faculty of Health Sciences put 22 highly experienced from the American Board of Radiologists to the test by studying the impact of prevalence expectation on the ability of the radiologists to detect pulmonary nodular lesions, or .

The 22 radiologists were divided into three groups and given an identical set of 30 chest X-rays to examine. Researchers tested whether accuracy rates improved or declined if the groups of radiologists were given different information about the number of cancer nodules present in the X-rays, thus altering their expectations about what to find.

The findings of the study show that there was no significant change in the number of cancer nodules that observers noticed after being given a prior expectation. However the study found significant increases in that demonstrate that efficiency decreases at higher prevalence expectations rates.

"What tended to change was the way they looked at the images," Dr. Reed said.

"This is an important finding as it could lead to extra fatigue which is detrimental to performance of radiologists, especially during long reporting sessions," Dr. Reed said. "It was quite a revelation. You'd assume that a radiologist would sit down and look at things in the same way, time and time again."

The study is of particular importance to those interested in studying the relationship between observer process and observer accuracy under laboratory and clinical conditions.

Dr. Reed is a member of the Image Optimisation and Perception Group in the Faculty of Health Sciences, which researches image perception and interpretation of medical imaging. Biological imaging is a fundamental component of health care systems and laboratory research. In the wake of major technological advancements the area is undergoing unprecedented change whereby imaging techniques, along with analytical tools, are being developed to display biological tissues and processes in new ways.

Provided by University of Sydney
Citation: Do pre-conceived expectations impact doctor analysis of X-rays? (2011, March 23) retrieved 24 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-03-pre-conceived-impact-doctor-analysis-x-rays.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Medicare payments for medical imaging are higher to nonradiologist physicians than to radiologists

 shares

Feedback to editors