Arctic sea ice continues decline, hits 2nd-lowest level
October 5, 2011 By Patrick Lynch
NASA satellite data reveals how this year's minimum sea ice extent, reached on Sept. 9 as depicted here, declined to a level far smaller than the 30-year average (in yellow) and opened up Northwest Passage shipping lanes (in red). Credit: NASA Goddard's Scientific Visualization Studio
(PhysOrg.com) -- Last month the extent of sea ice covering the Arctic Ocean declined to the second-lowest extent on record. Satellite data from NASA and the NASA-supported National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) at the University of Colorado in Boulder showed that the summertime sea ice cover narrowly avoided a new record low.
The Arctic ice cap grows each winter as the sun sets for several months and shrinks each summer as the sun rises higher in the northern sky. Each year the Arctic sea ice reaches its annual minimum extent in September. It hit a record low in 2007.
The near-record ice-melt followed higher-than-average summer temperatures, but without the unusual weather conditions that contributed to the extreme melt of 2007. "Atmospheric and oceanic conditions were not as conducive to ice loss this year, but the melt still neared 2007 levels," said NSIDC scientist Walt Meier. "This probably reflects loss of multiyear ice in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas as well as other factors that are making the ice more vulnerable."
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This video shows Arctic sea ice from March 7, 2011, to Sept. 9, 2011. (Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)
Joey Comiso, senior scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., said the continued low minimum sea ice levels fits into the large-scale decline pattern that scientists have watched unfold over the past three decades."The sea ice is not only declining, the pace of the decline is becoming more drastic," Comiso said. "The older, thicker ice is declining faster than the rest, making for a more vulnerable perennial ice cover."
While the sea ice extent did not dip below the 2007 record, the sea ice area as measured by the microwave radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite did drop slightly lower than 2007 levels for about 10 days in early September, Comiso said. Sea ice "area" differs from extent in that it equals the actual surface area covered by ice, while extent includes any area where ice covers at least 15 percent of the ocean.
Arctic sea ice extent on Sept. 9, the lowest point this year, was 4.33 million square kilometers (1.67 million square miles). Averaged over the month of September, ice extent was 4.61 million square kilometers (1.78 million square miles). This places 2011 as the second lowest ice extent both for the daily minimum extent and the monthly average. Ice extent was 2.43 million square kilometers (938,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 average.
This summer's low ice extent continued the downward trend seen over the last 30 years, which scientists attribute largely to warming temperatures caused by climate change. Data show that Arctic sea ice has been declining both in extent and thickness. Since 1979, September Arctic sea ice extent has declined by 12 percent per decade.
"The oldest and thickest ice in the Arctic continues to decline, especially in the Beaufort Sea and the Canada Basin," NSIDC scientist Julienne Stroeve said. "This appears to be an important driver for the low sea ice conditions over the past few summers."
Climate models have suggested that the Arctic could lose almost all of its summer ice cover by 2100, but in recent years, ice extent has declined faster than the models predicted.
NASA monitors and studies changing sea ice conditions in both the Arctic and Antarctic with a variety of spaceborne and airborne research capabilities. This month NASA resumes Operation IceBridge, a multi-year series of flights over sea ice and ice sheets at both poles. This fall's campaign will be based out of Punta Arenas, Chile, and make flights over Antarctica. NASA also continues work toward launching ICESat-2 in 2016, which will continue its predecessor's crucial laser altimetry observations of ice cover from space.
-
Winter Sea Ice Fails to Recover, Down to Record Low
Apr 06, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Arctic sea ice narrowly missed record low in winter 2007, says University of Colorado team
Apr 04, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Arctic sea ice reaches minimum 2011 extent, making it second lowest in satellite record
Sep 15, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
NASA data show Arctic saw fastest August sea ice retreat on record
Sep 28, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Arctic sea ice settles at second-lowest, underscores accelerating decline
Sep 16, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Stars containing dark matter should look different from other stars
Feb 20, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (17) |
11
-
Physicists discover evidence of rare hypernucleus, a component of strange matter
Feb 17, 2012 |
4.7 / 5 (38) |
22
-
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
Feb 13, 2012 |
5 / 5 (8) |
1
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (36) |
32
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
Is the Earth really going to die
14 hours ago
-
Do some geologists actually act a lot like Randy Marsh?
Feb 11, 2012
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
Feb 09, 2012
-
where gems are found in the world
Feb 09, 2012
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Spitzer finds solid buckyballs in space
(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope have, for the first time, discovered buckyballs in a solid form in space. Prior to this discovery, the microscopic carbon spheres ...
14 hours ago |
4.7 / 5 (12) |
8
|
Going up: Japan builder eyes space elevator
A Japanese construction firm claimed Wednesday it could execute an out-of-this-world plan to put tourists in space within 40 years by building an elevator that stretches a quarter of the way to the moon.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
21 hours ago |
3.5 / 5 (13) |
26
ENASA satellite finds Earth's clouds are getting lower
(PhysOrg.com) -- Earth's clouds got a little lower -- about one percent on average -- during the first decade of this century, finds a new NASA-funded university study based on NASA satellite data. The results ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
18 hours ago |
5 / 5 (8) |
13
|
Fresh scandal embroils US climate science debate
A fresh scandal over climate change has erupted in the United States after leaked documents appeared to show a right-wing funded campaign to influence how climate science is taught in schools.
11 hours ago |
4.1 / 5 (9) |
8
World's oceans get an acid bath
Among the repercussions of global climate change, the effect of ocean acidification on marine life is one of the least-understood variables.
18 hours ago |
4.3 / 5 (6) |
4
|
Researchers build first physical 'metatronic' circuit
(PhysOrg.com) -- The technological world of the 21st century owes a tremendous amount to advances in electrical engineering, specifically, the ability to finely control the flow of electrical charges using ...
Faster than light neutrinos? More like faulty wiring
You can shelf your designs for a warp drive engine (for now) and put the DeLorean back in the garage; it turns out neutrinos may not have broken any cosmic speed limits after all.
Physicists surprised by disappearing and reappearing superconductivity in iron selenium chalcogenides
Superconductivity is a rare physical state in which matter is able to conduct electricity -- maintain a flow of electrons -- without any resistance. This phenomenon can only be found in certain materials at low temperatures, ...
Stanford research team cracks animated NuCaptcha
(PhysOrg.com) -- The research team from Stanford University, led by Elie Bursztein, that previously had cracked regular CAPTCHAs and then audio CAPTCHAs, now has also successfully cracked the animated version called NuCapt ...
Flesh-eating bacteria inspire superglue
(PhysOrg.com) -- A bio-inspired superglue has been developed by Oxford University researchers that cant be matched for sticking molecules together and not letting go.
Scientists create potent molecules aimed at treating muscular dystrophy
While RNA is an appealing drug target, small molecules that can actually affect its function have rarely been found. But now scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have for the first time designed ...
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (18)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (18)
But seriously, when are these asshats going to realise climate change is fact.../
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (19)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (26)
when chumps like u will realize climategate proved once and for all that global warming its a elite bankster scam to introduce the new global carbon tax ponzi scheme to further empoverish and control the world nations?
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (28)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (23)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (17)
The longer record shows considerable ice loss as well.
Have you been a Tard all your life?
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (19)
Odd that your Extremist Tard Boy Conclusion differs from that of 98% of the scientists world wide.
You do realize don't you that listening to Conservative Liars like Rush Limbaugh and "guests" on Faux News isn't research.
You poor Tard you.
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (21)
Your perception of "Climate Gate" is a Conservative fantasy that is devoid of all manner of reality, as evidenced by the fact that all attempts to prove your assertions by all investigators failed to lend any support at all to your statement.
Can you explain that to us TARD boy?
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (23)
It does. And the changes that will be seen over the next 100 years will rival the extent of the changes seen over those million years.
The Biosphere is constrained in the rate at which it can adapt to that change.
The ongoing desertification of the U.S. MidWest illustates the difficulty that the U.S. will have adapting.
Do you expect to be able to grow grain on the exposed bedrock of the Canadian shield?
Tarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (24)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (15)
Adhom attacks really don't make you sound very bright, and certainly don't qualify as a good debate tactic.
Vendicar
Can you provide a link to the 'longer record' you are looking at? I can't find one at NSIDC. There is some evidence that Vikings were able to sail the North coast of Canada, but that may suggest that the 2007 record low (in our 32 year record) is not unusual on longer scales.
Just FYI, the recent low ice extents have been caused mainly by a semi-permanent low pressure system near Iceland. It has been pulling the ice down towards the Atlantic where it melts. You do understand that the ice cap actually moves around in response to prevailing winds and pressure systems, don't you? In the top picture, notice how the ice is pushed up against Greenland, leaving the far side ice free. It's not global warming.
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (20)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (13)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (11)
From NSIDC:
http://nsidc.org/...dex.html
It had very little to do with global average temperatures. It could even happen on a cold year.
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (13)
to GMurphy:
wikipedia? really? puuuhleazzze, give me an f'n break. wiki can't be used for anything climate related. Everybody knows that.
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (14)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (14)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (19)
You say that I AM THE ONE CHERRYPICKING? That's a good laugh. I just quoted the parts that Physorg left out of their cherrypicked article. I didn't think it made any sense to re-quote the parts that are already shown above. Good lord, why do you have to be so obtuse ALL the time?
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (18)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (15)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (13)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (12)
hmmmm..... with a predicted high of 64*F on Sunday according to NOAA. That's hardly a "return," is it?
Big whoop. It snowed 4 inches at my place 3 weeks ago. Then highs in the mid-60s for two weeks after that. This is normal for the Rocky Mountains.
We have a word for these types of events. Weather.
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (15)
Oct 05, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (13)
"Smoking isn't dangerous." - Rush Limbaugh
"Smoking doesn't cause cancer." - Rush Limbaugh
Oct 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
Oct 06, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (18)
Lying as usual. You must be a leftist.
The only "quote" from Limbaugh that shows up in google is the last one, but you of course have conveniently omitted a critical word - "Passive", i.e., "second-hand", without an ellipsis which would have been a dead giveaway that you're pulling this way out of context. The whole quote is "Passive smoking doesn't cause cancer".
The EPA was cited by a federal judge for disregarding their own stated methodology and statistical protocols in faking their wholly political conclusions re: second-hand smoke. But dishonest leftlings (but I repeat myself) never, ever let facts or evidence or truth get in the way on their journey to force the rest of us into the Workers' Utopia as prophesized by St Karl of Marx.
Googling the other two "quotes" from Limbaugh brings up nothing but more mis-"quotes" from comments made by...none other than Venereal DicTard himself. How convenient.
Making up "quotes" is a standard Alinskyite tool.
Oct 06, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (11)
"The only "quote" from Limbaugh that shows up in google is the last one..." - goksTard
"They keep forecasting a housing bubble that doesn't happen.
They keep forecasting that job losses are going to skyrocket, unemployment is going to rise.
They keep forecasting doom and gloom. The Democrats and the drive-by media continue to set you up for bad news." - Rush Limbaugh
"There is no housing bubble" - Rush Limbaugh
Oct 06, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
And of course, I see the usual personal attack from PinkElephant. Some people never change. Why do you think the arguments from alarmists are usually so weak? Personal attacks, anctedotal evidence, lies, misdirection, straw man arguments, misquotes, namecalling, etc. I really grow tired of pointing them all out. If you cleared all of those type comments from this thread, there wouldn't be much left.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (13)
Except that he's 100% right. I've noticed the same pattern of behavior in your posts: trying to appear fair and balanced, veiled digs meant to be taken as 'jokes' (usually through folksy anecdotes), asking rhetorical questions meant to sow the seeds of doubt, etc.
It's a very clever approach that comes across very reasonable to the casual reader, but the pattern becomes obvious to posters of longer standing.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
I think there are too many special interests, and people should read carefully, check sources, and call out inconsistencies when they see them. That's all I do. I do it when the activists on the Right say silly things too. You don't see that because there aren't any Rightist articles here. It's funny to me that you guys said what you just said, because I get the same accusations from the extreemists at Wattsupwiththat. They think I'm an agenda driven Leftist troll. So, which is it? Can I possibly be both a Leftist AND a Rightist?
I seriously don't think so.
The sad truth is that neither side likes to see their propaganda challenged.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
That's the same falacious reasoning you guys use, so you aren't any better.
Do you honestly think the story above is a balanced summary of the October issue of the NSIDC report? Do you think the parts they chose to include and the parts they chose to leave out were by chance? Ask yourself why you "feel" any emotion when I pointed out that they didn't publish a significant portion of the report. I didn't make up the part of the report I quoted. That came straight from NSIDC. How does that make me agenda driven? Why do you not want people to read that part? What is wrong with me pointing out a significant factor that apparently NONE of you knew about?
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Definitely 'Rightist'. You've let your guard down a number of times which betrayed your ideological bent.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Can we go from there and discuss reasonable solutions that will at least mitigate the risks for our brothers and sisters all over the world? Or do we really not give two shits about people outside our "tribe?"
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Two of your quotes from this thread:
"It's not global warming"
"I don't have a stance"
I'm not judging your views as leftist or rightist...but it is difficult to take any point you're trying to make seriously when, as previously mentioned, this pattern of behaviour continues to emerge.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
for the first part, haven't you heard of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act? I think we are already doing our share here in the US.
for the second part, once again, I think we already do more than our share. Here's a thought: lets kill two birds with one stone. How about if we set up laws that prevent outsourcing of American jobs to any country that doesn't meet Clean Air and Water Act standards? That would really be "doing something".
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Your proposal is really only significant for India and China, no? At least at this moment, before the other emerging markets, well, emerge more. So, you are proposing that we drastically change our fundamental economic partnerships, and therefore drastically change the global economy. How is this less risky than merely leading by example and sacrificing a very small amount of economic growth to get a handle on consumption and invest more in greener tech? Even if we aren't followed, have we not invested in our future by separating our energy from national security, and diversifying our energy sources?
I'm a total novice on this issue; just seeking info and brainstorming here....
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
That was repeatedly proposed during the Reagan and Bush administrations. The Cato Institute and the other pro-corporate Libertarian propaganda organizations opposed all such proposals, demanding that free market fundamentalism was the only way to save American Jobs.
Oct 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Do you have any evidence of this? If people are getting paid to crank out results, I´d like to kick down the doors of some of my colleagues and try to get a slice of that pie for myself. I can make numbers. I like money.
Where do you guys get this global conspiracy of liberals and scientists crap? If anything, these aluminum-foil hat wearing people do nothing but further convince me that we need to increase taxes and spend it on education because clearly folks are missing the ability to think critically. Once science has been discredited in popular opinion, I´m sure they´ll go after doctors, economists, and Kermit the Frog.
Oct 09, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
http://neven1.typ...011.html
This is the VOLUME, not just the extent.
You can't just blame the lows in 2007 and 2011 on isolated "weather" events, because guess what? The TREND is still downward the whole way.
Moreover, 2010 was 2000km cubed BELOW 2007, and 2011 was lower still.
Additionally, 2007, the "dipole year" was actually only just BARELY lower than 2008 and 2009, which were non-dipole years.
then 2010, a non-dipole year, was much lower than 2007...
So any claim that it was "only" because of the arctic dipole is just BS.
Compare dipole year to dipole year, and non-dipole to non-dipole:
2011 is around 2500km cubed below 2007.
2010 is around 2500km cubed below 2009.
Then you have to consider all the calving which took place in Greenland and replenished the "sea" ice, and you still have this much net loss of "sea" ice, because all of the new ice bergs melted too...
Oct 09, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
-2.9 Plus or minus 1 (1000km^3) per decade...
So that's between -1900 and -3900 per decade.
WTF...
There was only 4300km^3 of ice remaining at the minimum this year.
so if the trend continues, based on just a naive linear average according to this data, the meltdown will be 11 to 23 years away, with the middle of the range being 17 years.
That might even be faster than my own calculations, because I had 15 years as the SHORT end, and 2053 (42 years) as the long end. The linear trend on this volume graph suggests as little as 11 years for the SHORT end and just 23 years for the long end.
These changes will be devastating.
I kid you not.
England and Spain will start getting hit by major hurricanes (coming up over the bermuda high,) within a few years after the first complete meltdown, because the cooling system on the central and East Atlantic will disappear.
That might be the LEAST concern at this rate...
Oct 09, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Linear projection of the 10 year trend from 2001 to 2010 suggest the ice will melt in 5.44 years, so round up to the nearest whole year, giving 6 years, or summer 2017.
But because 2001 was a local peak, it slightly skews the slope of the curve to steeper than it maybe should be, so I backed up to 1999, which was a local minimum so as to compare local minimums to local minimums.
Linear projection (going from local minimum to local minimum) from there gives only 7.81 years, so round up to 8 years, gives 2019.
Using local maximum to local maximum, 2001 to 2008, and then projecting that forward produces, after rounding up, 10 years from 2008, or 6 years from 2011, giving 2018 and 2017 respectively.
The reason these numbers are so much shorter than the long term linear trend is that is weighted by 1979-1999.