Food crops damaged by pollution crossing continents
January 30, 2012
(PhysOrg.com) -- Man-made air pollution from North America causes Europe to lose 1.2 million tonnes of wheat a year, a new study has found.
The research, led by the University of Leeds and co-authored by the University of York, shows for the first time the extent of the Northern Hemisphere's intercontinental crop losses caused by ozone - a chemical partly produced by fossil fuels.
The study also suggests that increasing levels of air pollution from one continent may partly offset efforts to cut carbon emissions in another.
The findings have important implications for international strategies to tackle global food shortages, as well as global climate and human health strategies.
In a paper published in Biogeosciences, researchers show how ozone pollution generated in each of the Northern Hemisphere's major industrialised regions (Europe, North America and South East Asia) damages six important agricultural crops (wheat, maize, soybean, cotton, potato and rice) not only locally, but also by travelling many thousands of kilometres downwind.
Of the yield losses to Europe caused by ozone, pollution originating from North America is responsible for a 1.2 million ton annual loss of wheat. This is the biggest intercontinental ozone-related impact on any food crop. The scale of the impact of North American pollution on European wheat has previously been unknown.
Dr Steve Arnold, a senior lecturer in atmospheric composition at the University of Leeds's School of Earth and Environment, who led the study, said: "Our findings demonstrate that air pollution plays a significant role in reducing global crop productivity, and show that the negative impacts of air pollution on crops may have to be addressed at an international level rather than through local air quality policies alone."
Researchers calculated projected levels of surface ozone concentration, a powerful air pollutant that is not only harmful to human health (particularly to the respiratory system) but also damages vegetation by damaging plant cells and inhibiting plant growth .
Enhanced surface ozone concentrations are produced through a chemical combination of hydrocarbon compounds and nitrogen oxides (nitrogen oxides are emitted into the atmosphere during high temperature combustion, for example by combustion of fossil fuels by motor vehicles and in coal fired power plants).
Michael Hollaway, a PhD student at the University of Leeds, used a computer model to predict reductions in global surface ozone if man-made emissions of nitrogen oxide from the three continents were shut off. Using crop location and yield calculations, he and the research team were able to predict impacts on staple food crops, each with their own unique sensitivity to ozone pollution.
Dr Lisa Emberson a senior lecturer from the University of York's Stockholm Environment Institute and Environment Department, said: "This study highlights the need for air pollution impacts on crops to be taken more seriously as a threat to food security; currently air quality is often overlooked as a determinant of future crop supply Given the sizeable yield losses of staple crops caused by surface ozone, coupled with the challenges facing our ability to be food secure in the coming decades further coordinated international efforts should be targeted at reducing emissions of ozone forming gases across the globe."
Other findings are:
-- In terms of global crop losses, Asian pollution dominates worldwide losses of wheat (50-60%) and rice (more than 90%).
-- North American pollution contributes the most to worldwide losses of maize (60-70%) and soybean (75-85%).
-- The impact of Europe's pollution on other continents is minor due to fewer low pressure systems and weather fronts, which are responsible for transporting pollution across continents.
Dr Arnold added: "With future emissions of ozone-forming chemicals from Europe and North America expected to reduce, and emissions from Asia to increase, the findings suggest that increasing pollution from Asia may partly offset crop production benefits gained in Europe and North America through local emission reduction strategies."
More information: The paper Intercontinental trans-boundary contributions to ozone-induced crop yield losses in the Northern Hemisphere by Michael Hollaway, Dr Steve Arnold, Prof Andy Challinor and Dr Lisa Emberson was published on 16 January 2012 and is available at: doi:10.5194/bg-9-271-2012
-
Study Links 'Smog' to Arctic Warming
Mar 14, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Foreign ozone emissions lower U.S. air quality
Dec 13, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
U.S. EPA finalizes ozone pollution rule
Nov 09, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Surface-level ozone pollution set to reduce tree growth 10 percent by 2100
Dec 09, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Springtime ozone increases over Western North America linked to emissions abroad
Jan 20, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Stars containing dark matter should look different from other stars
Feb 20, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (17) |
11
-
Physicists discover evidence of rare hypernucleus, a component of strange matter
Feb 17, 2012 |
4.7 / 5 (38) |
22
-
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
Feb 13, 2012 |
5 / 5 (8) |
1
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (36) |
32
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
Flowering Plant Revived After 30,000 Years in Permafrost
Feb 21, 2012
-
Toba volcano eruptions - 1.000 - 10,000 breeding pairsunb
Feb 20, 2012
-
How is a specific gene removed from DNA
Feb 20, 2012
-
Reproduction and Human evolution
Feb 19, 2012
-
Viruses: Living or Non-living organisms
Feb 19, 2012
-
Would you eat brainless animals?
Feb 16, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Surprising diversity at a synapse hints at complex diversity of neural circuitry
A new study reveals a dazzling degree of biological diversity in an unexpected place a single neural connection in the body wall of flies.
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
0
|
Men might not 'become extinct' after all: Theory of the 'rotting' Y chromosome dealt a fatal blow
If you were to discover that a fundamental component of human biology has survived virtually intact for the past 25 million years, you'd be quite confident in saying that it is here to stay.
9 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
1
|
Climate change affects bird migration timing in North America
Bird migration timing across North America has been affected by climate change, according to a study published Feb. 22 in the open access journal PLoS ONE.
5 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (2) |
2
Chronic stress in elephants can affect long-term behavior
Stress is known to lead to short-term escape behavior, and new research on elephants in South Africa shows that it can also cause long-term escape behavior, affecting the extent that elephants use their habitat. The work ...
5 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
New iridescent lizard species found in Cambodia
A new species of lizard with striking iridescent rainbow skin, a long tail and very short legs has been discovered in the rainforest in northeast Cambodia, conservationists announced Wednesday.
6 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Researchers build first physical 'metatronic' circuit
(PhysOrg.com) -- The technological world of the 21st century owes a tremendous amount to advances in electrical engineering, specifically, the ability to finely control the flow of electrical charges using ...
Faster than light neutrinos? More like faulty wiring
You can shelf your designs for a warp drive engine (for now) and put the DeLorean back in the garage; it turns out neutrinos may not have broken any cosmic speed limits after all.
Spitzer finds solid buckyballs in space
(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope have, for the first time, discovered buckyballs in a solid form in space. Prior to this discovery, the microscopic carbon spheres ...
Physicists surprised by disappearing and reappearing superconductivity in iron selenium chalcogenides
Superconductivity is a rare physical state in which matter is able to conduct electricity -- maintain a flow of electrons -- without any resistance. This phenomenon can only be found in certain materials at low temperatures, ...
Scientists create potent molecules aimed at treating muscular dystrophy
While RNA is an appealing drug target, small molecules that can actually affect its function have rarely been found. But now scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have for the first time designed ...
Less is more: Study of tiny droplets could have big impact on industrial applications
(PhysOrg.com) -- Under a microscope, a tiny droplet slides between two fine hairs like a roller coaster on a set of rails until poof it suddenly spreads along them, a droplet no more.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
We can't expect such from developing countries, but areas like Japan, EU and US have the technology, wealth and knowledge to set an example on how we keep this blue&green ball blue and green.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (10)
Note, not measured, calculated (i.e., guesstimated).
A computed model then guesstimates effects.
Totally made up. This is not science.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
Simulations for unknown quantities just allow ignorance to appear knowledgeable.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If the article was about a magnetohydrodynamic simulation the response would certainly be less hostile.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
They are using a computer program to make it appear that they have discovered something. But they are only promoting their own biases.
Again, if it is so important, why not actually measure? Why guess at the output, then guess at the effect of that unknown output?
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Because that's the second step. They're just done doing the simulation and now they will certainly go on and look at the historical data (e.g. by comparing fod production during recession years and years with high pollution output)
You really have to come off this 'bias' trip. Scientists get paid no matter what the results of their research. They have no incentive to bias anything (actually they have a large incentive NOT to bias their data - because all those who did get found out eventually and their careers come to a crashing halt)
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
It is not feeding guesses into a simulation which has not been validated.
Garbage in, garbage in and a garbage program can only yield garbage out.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
So basically what you are saying is that simulations are fine except when YOU think whatever algorithms they use are garbage. I guess we should stop making predictions about better car or airplane designs or just about every aspect of our existence all together right? Because there is no way that a simulation that predicts something can be right!
So I guess I should just not continue in my current field because I need to use computer models that are not 100% correct to predict interactions of various proteins. Thanks a lot!
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
No, didn't say any such thing. There are many very good simulations. They have been tested with real data and have shown agreement with reality.
The simulation used in this article has not been validated and is unlikely to be validated since it was fed made up data. If it were the best simulation in the world, it would fail from receiving invalid input.
Try reading the article. They calculated projected levels of surface ozone. That means they made up the values used in the simulation.
Then they created a computer program which predicted the damage to crops based on nothing but the made up input and the unvalidated processes in the program.
The simulation was only used to lend credence to an incredible assertion.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
That right there would tell me how much of a troll you are. Calculations aren't pulled from thin air with no regard to any promising or factual data. Data isn't just magically created and made up by the scientists on the spot.
You've never been paid to do a study. That much is obvious and a given by your bias here.
Where in your fallaciously filled argument am I suppose to be convinced that you know anything about scientific studies? Let alone anything about developing a hypothesis, theory, or law.
Like Jaeherys has implied, you really are completely clueless about high level science.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Why not read the article to determine the source of the data:
Note the two words 'calculated projected'. I pointed out that they made up their data. They actually said so.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
Ok, I understand better what you are saying. But projected levels implies that they have to have data to project from. That data came from sensors described in table 3 of the paper, so do you think that those values are wrong?
Finally, in the paper they calculated the contributions of NO_x levels from different regions around the planet. There have been other papers written that describe global NO_x levels (current and future) as well as the affect of NO_x levels on plant growth (by 2030 estimated to be 12-35 billion dollars).
Using this data they were able to determine the amount of loss each region has on the chosen plants, current and future. Subsequently the economic impact each region has.
So what's the problem here? Cause I really don't see one.
Jan 30, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
If you admit that there are, why do you think that they didn't use them in the intercontinental ozone transport simulations?
Jan 31, 2012
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Can't read the article can you? I said that the article notes that they 'calculated projected' levels of surface ozone concentration. I did not say that measurements have not ever been made. I pointed out that the authors of this study did not use measurement, they -- by their own words -- calculated and projected values to use in their computer simulation.
Jan 31, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
Which was caused by the USA in the first place.
Jan 31, 2012
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
The focus of the article is on the effect of one source of pollution on one crop. However, the devil is in the details:
"-- In terms of global crop losses, Asian pollution dominates worldwide losses of wheat (50-60%) and rice (more than 90%).
-- North American pollution contributes the most to worldwide losses of maize (60-70%) and soybean (75-85%).
-- The impact of Europe's pollution on other continents is minor due to fewer low pressure systems and weather fronts, which are responsible for transporting pollution across continents."
The figures suggest that local pollution affects local crops most strongly.
Note that Asian pollution is responsible for at least half of all global wheat losses, not the USA.
The author cherry-picked the data to create a politically inflammatory leading sentence for this article.
Jan 31, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
I regard the US as a well developed 1st world country that unlike many Asian countries does not need to put the development of welfare (developing welfare requires pollution, already having it enables different sollutions) for each citizen before environmentally important issues (a reason Bush chose to ignore the Kyoto protocol).
Also if you look at emissions per capita (remember Asia makes up half the world's population and US has only around 300 million people)the figures aren't particularly in favour of debunking a politically inflammatory statement about the USA.
Jan 31, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
I read the article, but unlike you I don't trust journalists to report with absolute accuracy the contents of the paper, word-by-word. Of course it has to be dumbed down and something is lost in the translation. Accusing someone of "not reading the article" in a news site is meaningless, you need to go to the source.
Open up the original paper and look at Table 3, that's where they got their data from. Is that "making up numbers out of thin air"?