Asteroid heads for Earth, Russian astronomer claims

I read about a directed energy weapon that proposes to push asteroids into different orbits.

"To help with mining asteroids and to protect the space craft we will use our patented particle beam weapon called Medusa."

http://nlspropuls...ult.aspx

It doesn't matter whether you use a g-tug, use a DEW, spray paint the astroid on one side, or throw a net around it, tie it to a rocket, and try and drag it (heh). Just don't blow the dang thing up.

Talk about going from bad to worse. Then instead of having one or 2 big pieces hitting Earth, you have a million littler pieces, all of which can still do serious damage. The total kinetic energy of the strike is still the same either way.

Total kinetic energy may be the same, but the idea of blowing it up is so that the smaller pieces can disintegrate in the upper atmosphere.

What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?

Probability. We jaywalk to save a few seconds crossing the street at an unfamiliar intersection. We're phobic about violent crimes which would happen to us less often than winning the state lottery.

Human civilization has been around for thousands of years. So the reason for suddenly looking for objects from space is....? Good news stories? Funding for obscure engineers and scientists looking for a meal ticket?

What would you rather have poured on you? 1000lbs of pennies from 20 feet or a 1000lbs copper slug?
--//--

I don't know how big they think the Apophos Asteroid is, but disintegration IS better than a slug. The asteroid in the Armageddon movie was like 500 kilometer diameter, which was very unrealistic even for a nuke to split that size object.

However, a "normal" object of a kilometer or two diameter could be blown apart by a well placed nuke, redirecting most of the material just enough to cause it to miss, and spreading out any residual impacts over a larger area and time.

It is better for many car or building size objects to enter the atmosphere a few at a time over several hours or days, than it is for an object the size of a small mountain to hit all at once. Smaller objects have a greater surface area per unit mass, which makes them burn up in atmostphere easier than a large one.

So the benefit of disintegration is manifold:

1) spread damage out over space and time.

2) burn up more of the object in the atmosphere, reducing the total mass, and therefore force, which reachers earth's surface.

3) Some of the material may miss the earth entirely.


I'll take the pennies because they are more likely to be slowed by air resistance and spread out, and also much of the energy will miss me, whereas a copper slug will hit all at once and smash me to oblivion.

Why not just divert the asteroid just enough so that it hits the moon instead of the earth. No Asteroid that might return one day, no "shot gun" fragments, and no massive resource requirements, as the deflection would be minor, especially if done early. This would also present a great scientific opportunity to study the explosion and resulting lunar crater formation?