Genome study charts genetic landscape of lung cancer
November 4th, 2007An international team of scientists today announced the results of a systematic effort to map the genetic changes underlying lung cancer, the world’s leading cause of cancer deaths. Appearing in the November 4 advance online issue of the journal Nature, the research provides a comprehensive view of the abnormal genetic landscape in lung cancer cells, revealing more than 50 genomic regions that are frequently gained or lost in human lung tumors.
While one-third of these regions contain genes already known to play important roles in lung cancer, the majority harbor new genes yet to be discovered. Flowing from this work, the scientists uncovered a critical gene alteration — not previously linked to any form of cancer — that is implicated in a significant fraction of lung cancer cases, shedding light on the biological basis of the disease and a potential new target for therapy.
“This view of the lung cancer genome is unprecedented, both in its breadth and depth,” said senior author Matthew Meyerson, a senior associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and an associate professor at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School. “It lays an essential foundation, and has already pinpointed an important gene that controls the growth of lung cells. This information offers crucial inroads to the biology of lung cancer and will help shape new strategies for cancer diagnosis and therapy.”
“The genomic landscape of lung cancer gives us a systematic picture of this terrible disease, confirming things we know, but also pointing us to many missing pieces of the puzzle,” said Eric Lander, one of the study’s co-authors and the founding director of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. “More broadly, the study represents a general approach that can and should be used to analyze all types of cancer. Indeed, the study was designed as a pilot project for an even more comprehensive effort to unearth the genetic causes of cancer.”
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide — each year more than 1 million people die of the disease, including more than 150,000 in the United States. New approaches to treatment rely on a deeper understanding of what goes wrong in cells to spur cancer growth. Through decades of research, it has become clear that lung cancer — like most human cancers — stems mainly from DNA changes that accrue in cells throughout a person’s life. But the nature of these changes and their biological consequences remain largely unknown.
To assemble a genome-wide catalog of genetic differences in lung cancer cells, a large-scale project was recently launched in lung adenocarcinoma. The effort, known as the Tumor Sequencing Project (TSP), unites scientists and clinicians throughout the cancer research community.
The TSP researchers studied more than 500 tumor specimens from lung cancer patients. Access to this large collection of high-quality samples made it possible to determine the genetic changes shared among different patients — such recurring changes can highlight important genes involved in cancer growth. “This project was made possible through the foresight of a dedicated group of oncologists, pathologists, and surgeons, who carefully and diligently preserved tissues from lung cancer patients over many years,” said Meyerson.
To analyze DNA from each lung tumor, the scientists relied on recent genomic technologies to scan the human genome for hundreds of thousands of genetic markers, called single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs. This high-resolution view helped pinpoint which parts of the tumor genome were present in excess copies or missing altogether. The regions of genomic aberration were then identified with new analytical tools, including a computational method called GISTIC and methods for visualizing SNP data developed by co-first authors Gaddy Getz and Barbara Weir and co-authors Rameen Beroukhim and Jim Robinson.
From this work, the researchers uncovered a total of 57 genomic changes that occur frequently in lung cancer patients. Of these, only about 15 are linked to genes previously known to be involved in lung adenocarcinoma. The rest, though, remain to be discovered.
Strikingly, the most common abnormality identified in the Nature study involves a region on chromosome 14 that encompasses two known genes, neither of which had been previously associated with cancer. Through additional studies in cancer cells, co-first author Sue-Ann Woo and other researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute revealed that one of the genes, NKX2.1, influences cancer cell growth. The NKX2.1 gene normally acts as a sort of “master regulator” — controlling the activity of other key genes — in a special group of cells lining the lungs’ tiny air sacs, called alveoli. This discovery, that a gene functioning in a select group of cells rather than all cells can promote cancer growth, may have broad implications for the design of novel, molecularly targeted cancer drugs.
The second phase of the TSP, now underway, will examine the same lung tumor samples analyzed in the first phase, but at an even greater level of genetic detail. Using high-throughput DNA sequencing methods, the scientists will characterize small changes in the genetic code of several hundred human genes, which are already implicated in other cancers or more generally in cell growth.
Source: MIT
Jul 02, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
Incredible reply Mike, totally floored me. You've just read an article on one of the most important pieces of research in the history of mankind and THATS what you have to say...
I am a Pediatrician.
...important research? How about a way to get people to stop killing themselves?
Agreed with MarkG.
(a) its wrong - smoking does not play a role in all cases of lung cancer (for example, asbestos poisoning or radon gas); and even when it does play a role it is rarely (if ever) the sole cause - otherwise, explain familial predispositions to the disease.
(b) your comment is irrelevant - read the article again: "the researchers uncovered a total of 57 genomic changes that occur frequently in lung cancer patients". Note that they were looking at genomic changes, *not* necessarily genomic causes.
So you are saying the only important research is that which teaches people to stop smoking? Anything else is irrelevant or absurd? It doesn't matter that this research contributes greatly to our understanding of the cancer - its only important if it removes the cancer itself?
There are plenty of people out there already who have shown the link between cancer and smoking; and there are also plenty of people out there campaigning for others to stop smoking - does that devalue the scientific contribution of this research?
And what about the lung cancers which *aren't* caused by smoking, shouldn't we learn more about it so that we can help *them* too? Even if everyone stopped smoking we'd still have lung cancer - so isn't it important that we understand the process, as these researchers are trying to do?
sorry for so many comments in a row, but I forgot to add this last time...
This research is *not* saying that genes cause cancer, at least not entirely. It is entirely compatible with smoking as the number one cause. What they have found is the biological basis of the cancer (however the cancer is caused, it doesn't matter).
For example, if you'd bothered to have read it, you'd have seen that they found a gene which controls the growth of lung cells and how this is affected by cancerous growth. So, regardless of what caused the cancer (smoking or whatever) this information "offers crucial inroads to the biology of lung cancer and will help shape new strategies for cancer diagnosis and therapy"
So if you want to preach to the choir about how smoking is the number one cause of cancer, go ahead - most people here are probably already aware of that. In the meantime, these researchers are working out ways to treat the disease... wouldn't you call that important research?