UN Panel Gives Dire Warming Forecast

November 17, 2007 By ARTHUR MAX, Associated Press Writer UN Panel Gives Dire Warming Forecast (AP)

In this photo supplied by Greenpeace, Greenpeace activists on a rubber boat buzz the 'Front Driver', cargo ship, some 15 miles off the coast of Valencia on the closing day of the 27th Plenary of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in Valencia, Saturday Nov. 17, 2007. Greenpeace claims the ship is carrying 153,000 tonnes of coal destined for the Spanish port of Tarragona. Greenpeace banner reads "burning coal destroys the climate". (AP Photo/Greenpeace, Pedro Armestre)

(AP) -- The Earth is hurtling toward a warmer climate at a quickening pace, a Nobel-winning U.N. scientific panel said in a landmark report released Saturday, warning of inevitable human suffering and the threat of extinction for some species.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


2010 species pledge set to fail: conservationists

created Jul 02, 2009 | popularity 3 / 5 (2) | comments 0

10 percent of world's major species at threat: report

created Sep 29, 2009 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Climate change amplifying animal disease

created May 25, 2009 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (27) | comments 3

Extinction crisis looms in Oceania: study

created Jul 28, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

New report details historic mass extinction of amphibians

created Aug 11, 2008 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (19) | comments 1


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 3.5 /5 (62 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • p1ll - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 3.3 / 5 (8)
    climate change is normal, we can only influence it minutely. If the earth was headed towards an ice age, I assume our influence over the climate would be enough to reverse it, right? Does anyone really believe we could counter an iceage by our contribution to CO2? Life will adapt to the changing climate. There's nothing we can do to change it.
  • p1ll - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
    quote from the article, "Unless action is taken, human activity could lead to "abrupt and irreversible changes" that would make the planet unrecognizable." Oh please! What doomsday nonsense! These "scientists" will be proven the fools they are in 10-20 years. If they are correct, I think we'll adapt just fine. I'm really tired of all this "end of the world-its our fault" crap.
  • jcummins - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 2.6 / 5 (10)
    I agree with the previous 2 comments.

    It makes me wonder why the entire media including hollowood movies is hyping the CO2 theatrics. Could it be that those who fund all those greens have something to gain?

    Why would the benevolent govts be participants to this classic Sun Tzu adventure unless these masters of the world are behind this divide and conquer scheme?

    Hopefully, the majority of the people can still think for themselves and recognize a rube-goldberg scam.
  • the_answer_is_42 - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 3.1 / 5 (8)
    It's unfortunate that the alarmist stance taken by a vocal minority has desensitized us to possible dangers of air pollution. That humanity can have a significant impact on the ecosystem is not a new or argued concept. The Peppered Moth has been used as an example of Natural Selection due to a change in the industrial English countryside for a century.

    I think humanity will survive the climatic changes, even if they are as catastrophic as some believe, but it won't be without a price. Heat waves are uncomfortable and expensive in the best case scenario, deadly for a small percentage of the population in the worst. Some U.S. cities are already out of water. This isn't new, but we no longer have the ability to simply abandon a town and move on like the pioneers did.

    It would be helful, and refreshing, if Gore and the enviromentalists would stick to verifiable facts. In any case, it certainly wouldn't hurt the U.S. and world at large to start thinking about the future and controlling pollution.
  • p1ll - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 3.4 / 5 (8)
    I agree. What bothers me most is that what the alarmists are implying we should do is to hault our economic development which has given mankind the best most prosperous lives in history. Does anyone really want to go back to the 18th century? Also, what about developing nations in africa, for example? Are they to hault any economic progress because they arent using hydrogen based or solar based energy to grow their economies and better their societies?

    the human race is on a forward moving direction that can't be stopped. Petrolium will run out and we will move to alternatives naturally. Just think, we live in the best times of any in history and we are told that the world is screwed, we're at fault, and the end is near.

    I live in Europe right now, and it's a given fact here that we are destroying the earth's climate and we're headed for disaster. There is no opposing voice to the rhetoric. It's in vogue now to be anti capitalist, anti american, etc, yet perople love their cars, their ipods, their McDonalds and all the things that are supposedly destroying the planet. Ok, my rant is done, hehehe, by the way I am open to the idea we are at fault, but not to the idea we should stop humanity's forward progress which has given us the best of times. We are all very lucky to live in the 21st century.
  • Zarky - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 2.8 / 5 (6)
    yes, they all agree Global Climate Change is happening but have they the right cause and therefore a possible correct solution ?????

    If they have the wrong cause then a solution is impossible

    and it is the fate of LIFE that is the stake.

    A hot-house Earth would need a roof, and a hot-house Earth would be lush and green with plenty of rain, warm and humid with "tropical weather".

    A drying, "The Death of Clouds" type planet can only be attributed to a disruption in the Hydrological Equilibrium on the Earth, determined by the water-atmosphere interface.

    The rising Carbon Dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is a sign of the changes in the water-atmosphere interface.

    The hydrological equilibrium constant of the water-atmosphere interface is readjusting to the altered sea/fresh water-atmospheric/heat water vapour diffusion rate, which has been lowered by the oil-sea water-atmosphere membrane ,,,, referred to as The Armageddon Factor.

    Human Beings are bringing LIFE to its knees, and still comments such as

    >> I am open to the idea we are at fault, but not to the idea we should stop humanity's forward progress which has given us the best of times >>>

    show that the extreme seriousness of the situation is not widely realised.

    The Cult of The Dinosaur

  • NotParker - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
    According to some, the earth is actually cooling.

    http://www.cru.ue.../g17.htm

    No year has been warmer than 1998.

    The claims of this panel are the desperate cries of a bunch of con artists who hope to steal a bunch of money before any figures out the con.
  • earls - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
    How about that 2007 killer hurricane season?
  • Hunabku - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 2.4 / 5 (8)
    Thankless... That would be how i sum up the mentality of those that see Global Warming as "no problem." Funny thing is, i would think people on physorg would have more respect for climatologists. Nearly all climatologists, over the past few years, have significantly increased the pace of global warming.

    Yes the majority of climatologists and related scientists agree, and yes they would be vocal on the area of their expertise. But that doesn't stop many of us, who might claim respect for scientists, to discredit or dramatically understate the magnitude of their predictions.

    Why? Because we're human. We don't want think about big consequences or responsibilities. We don't want to consider big change and will justify whatever we need to feel comfortably numb.

    Also we are political by nature - and lets face it - there has been an awful lot of spin and pundits speaking contrary to the scientists - and that should be no surprise since there ARE many vested interests in downplaying global warming.

    The reality that seems so hard for many of us to accept is the same reality that is difficult for young children to accept - ie that we are mortal and that our actions have consequences. GROW UP - our lives on this planet are held in a tenuous balance. It is time we show our gratitude for the fragile and complex interactions that bless us with life.

    Our we that thankless to allow the widespread decimation of so many species on this planet. - destroying the very web of life that allows for us to live. The earth (though the universal laws) is up to something - its called life and the generative process - if we don't get with it, she will continue without us. Sad thing is we are taking so many of our relatives (plants, animals and ecosystems) with us in our self-absorbed short-sightedness.
  • NotParker - Nov 17, 2007
    • Rank: 3.3 / 5 (11)
    The amount of solar energy reaching the earth is at an 8,000 year high in terms of duration and intensity.

    Blaming a small amount of warming on CO2 is a con game.

    Its the Sun.

    Large parts of the UK are receiving 20% more sunlight than they did in 1929.

    Its the Sun.

  • Zarky - Nov 18, 2007
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (7)
    >>> According to some, the earth is actually cooling. >>>

    Indeed it will cool, and an Ice Age like none before will envelope the Earth.

    The Ice Clouds are already forming
  • fleem - Nov 18, 2007
    • Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
    People don't seem to understand that no matter how many years a really smart person goes to school, that person will not be able to create an even remotely accurate computer simulation when it lacks several orders of magnitude in the precision of its inputs.

    A ratings-hungry media, publish-hungry and grant-hungry "scientists", and an organization of 3rd-world power and money-hungry dictators called "the U.N" don't seem to realize this, either. I wonder why.

    90% of the GM alarmist articles I see are riddled with fluff and junk science. For example, there is not one drop of evidence, and much to the contrary, that the Earth's climate has metastable states, yet most GM alarmist say it does. For another example, we do have accurate measurements of sea level rise, especially for the last 150 years, and the rise is not accelerating AT ALL.

    Not only is there evidence of probable solar increase, I'm also starting to look at changes in magma flow--check out the acceleration in the rising surface of yellowstone.
  • mikiwud - Nov 18, 2007
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    Forget climate change,bring back global warming!
    We've got heavy snow in the English midlands,
    heavy enough to kill the Sky signal.
    I cannot remember snow in november for a long time.
  • roguetrekker - Nov 18, 2007
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (5)
    Posted by Hunabku:
    "Also we are political by nature - and lets face it - there has been an awful lot of spin and pundits speaking contrary to the scientists - and that should be no surprise since there ARE many vested interests in downplaying global warming."

    There ARE also many vested interests in playing-up global warming. "Vote for me or it will be YOUR fault the world is heating up and all life will die." Gee, I wonder who would benefit from that idea...
  • CWFlink - Nov 26, 2007
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    It is telling that the aim of much of the hype is to penalize burning of coal and oil while increasing the spread of nuclear power. This is precisely the objective of the politically power-hungry of the 3rd world who want to justify obtaining nuclear technology while punishing the countries with the most coal and oil reserves.

    If the goal was to reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, then primary goal of Kyoto would be to reduce travel (especially air travel) and increase the use of the Internet as an alternative to tourism and commerce.

November 17, 2007 all stories

Comments: 15

3.5 /5 (62 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Opacity of the Earth's atmosphere
    created Dec 13, 2009
  • Effect of ranching on the environment
    created Dec 12, 2009
  • Earth's response to CO2 underestimated
    created Dec 10, 2009
  • Question about Thermohaline Circulation
    created Dec 10, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Earth

Other News

Hypoxia increases as climate warms

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 1minute ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

A new study of Pacific Ocean sediments off the coast of Chile has found that offshore waters experienced systematic oxygen depletion during the rapid warming of the Antarctic following the last "glacial maximum" period 20,000 ...


Home heating efficiencies offer 'hat trick' of savings: study

Space & Earth / Environment

created 4 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Improving the energy efficiency of Maryland homes heated by natural gas would generate a "hat trick" of economic and environmental benefits over the next 10 years, including more than 80,000 new jobs, savings of hundreds ...


New planet discoveries suggest low-mass planets are common around nearby stars

New planet discoveries suggest low-mass planets are common around nearby stars (w/ Video)

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 22 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (15) | comments 12

(PhysOrg.com) -- An international team of planet hunters has discovered as many as six low-mass planets around two nearby Sun-like stars, including two "super-Earths" with masses 5 and 7.5 times the mass of ...


Scientist uncovers relics of ancient cosmos

Scientist uncovers relics of ancient cosmos

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 17 hours ago | popularity 4.4 / 5 (13) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- A University of Manchester scientist, working as part of an international team, has uncovered an unexpectedly rich trove of relicts from the ancient cosmos.


Ethanol-powered vehicles generate more ozone than gas-powered ones

Space & Earth / Environment

created 23 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (7) | comments 4

Ethanol, often promoted as a clean-burning, renewable fuel that could help wean the nation from oil, would likely worsen health problems caused by ozone, compared with gasoline, especially in winter, according to a new study ...