Radiation flashes may help crack cosmic mystery

December 3, 2007

Faint, fleeting blue flashes of radiation emitted by particles that travel faster than the speed of light through the atmosphere may help scientists solve one of the oldest mysteries in astrophysics.

For nearly a century, scientists have wondered about the origin of cosmic rays—subatomic particles of matter that stream in from outer space. “Where exactly, we don’t know,” said Scott Wakely, Assistant Professor in Physics at the University of Chicago. “They’re raining down on the atmosphere of the Earth, tens of thousands of particles per second per square meter.”

Recent results from the Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory suggest that the highest-energy cosmic rays may come from the centers of active galaxies. But the vast majority of the cosmic rays seen at Earth originate from its own galaxy, from sources that are still unknown. Tracking down these sources is crucial to developing a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon, scientists say.

The University of Chicago’s Enrico Fermi suggested more than 50 years ago a process that, in its modern form, could allow the shock waves of exploding stars to propel most cosmic rays to their high energies. The idea remains popular, but unverified.

Wakely now has a $625,000 grant from the National Science Foundation to develop an instrument that might reveal important new data about the nature and origin of cosmic rays. Working in collaboration with Simon Swordy, the James Franck Professor in Physics at Chicago, they plan to make detailed measurements of Cerenkov radiation, which cosmic rays emit when they travel faster than the speed of light through the atmosphere.

While many people believe that nothing moves faster than light, “what’s actually the case is nothing can go faster than light can go in a vacuum,” Wakely explained. But light moves slower in air and water than it does in a vacuum.

“So it’s possible that you get a particle which goes through the atmosphere faster than light does. And when that happens, you get the equivalent of a sonic boom, but with electromagnetic radiation. And that light boom is called Cerenkov radiation.”

Wakely and Swordy are particularly interested in measuring the energy and mass of cosmic rays. But the density of molecules in the atmosphere stands in the way. When high-energy charged particles hit the top of the atmosphere, it’s like smashing into 30 feet of water. The individual particles break into a shower of smaller pieces, frustrating attempts to measure them directly.

Incoming cosmic-ray particles trigger two flashes of Cerenkov radiation. The first occurs when the original particle enters into the atmosphere, but the resulting shower of secondary particles also emits Cerenkov light. In a 2001 article published in Astroparticle Physics, the University of Utah’s David Kieda, along with Swordy and Wakely, proposed a ground-based “direct Cerenkov technique.” The idea was to record both flashes of Cerenkov light.

Many experiments are designed to record the second flash of Cerenkov light. These include a collaboration called VERITAS (Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System), to which Swordy and Wakely belong. But no one had ever looked for that first Cerenkov flash until Kieda, Swordy and Wakely pointed out that it should be there.

The first scientists to see direct Cerenkov light belong to a European group that operate the High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS), an array of telescopes in the African nation of Namibia. “They showed that even with non-optimum equipment, you could actually do something useful,” Wakely said. “With equipment designed to do this properly, we can do even better.”

The idea behind direct Cerenkov detection was to combine the precision of balloon-borne cosmic-ray instruments with the far greater detection area afforded by ground-based arrays like VERITAS and HESS. “This is something that’s never been possible before,” Wakely said.

Low-energy cosmic rays are pervasive. But as their energy increases, their frequency drops dramatically. Scientists try to work around this obstacle by building extensive detector arrays on the ground. Another strategy: fly their instruments on high-altitude, helium-filled balloons into the atmosphere, where fewer air molecules get in the way.

Both methods involve trade-offs. “Balloon-borne experiments are small, but exquisite in their detail,” Wakely said, while ground-based experiments are huge but offer poor resolution.

Most cosmic rays are protons or other types of charged particles. But some of them consist of the nuclei of iron atoms or other heavy elements. An iron nucleus traveling at nearly the speed of light produces approximately 700 times more light than a single proton.

“We came up with this idea because we had done both direct measurements of cosmic-ray nuclei before they interact in the atmosphere—on balloons and spacecraft—and also work with air shower detection at ground level,” Swordy said.

Source: University of Chicago


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.5 /5 (44 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • gmurphy - Dec 06, 2007
    • Rank: not rated yet
    does anyone else find the claim that the particles travel faster than the speed of light suspicious?, it seems to be mentioned without any attempt to validate it, a poor article.
  • Valentiinro - Dec 09, 2007
    • Rank: not rated yet
    It is not faster that the speed of light, "c". They mean the speed of light in air. Do you know anything about optics? Light moves slower in different mediums. In some it can get quite slow. If I am not mistaken, in particle accelerators they get protons and electrons moving pretty close to the speed of light (in a vacuum), and that is just with the power we can generate on earth. Wherever these cosmic ray nuclei are coming from there is probably more power than we could generate without blowing our planet up.
    This article is not saying anything new about physics. Cerenkov radiation has been known about for a long time. The article is all about astronomy.
  • nilbud - Dec 12, 2007
    • Rank: not rated yet
    gmurphy poor comment. Was googling Cherenkov radiation beyond you?

December 3, 2007 all stories

Comments: 3

4.5 /5 (44 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Hunting for Planets in the Dark
    created Nov 19, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • COBE Satellite Marks 20th Anniversary
    created Nov 17, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • NASA's Wise Gets Ready to Survey the Whole Sky (w/ Video)
    created Nov 17, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • In a Galaxy Far, Far Away...
    created Nov 06, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Shedding Light on the Cosmic Skeleton
    created Nov 03, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Need Book Recommendation
    created 1hour ago
  • Rocket Experiment Help
    created 4 hours ago
  • Coulomb's Law
    created 8 hours ago
  • Laser spots
    created 13 hours ago
  • Do you know elementary physics?
    created 14 hours ago
  • Bicycles and their mad skillz
    created 15 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

Aquatic creatures mix ocean water

Physics / General Physics

created 14 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Understanding mixing in the ocean is of fundamental importance to modeling climate change or predicting the effects of an El Niño on our weather. Modern ocean models primarily incorporate the effects of winds and tides. However, ...


Generating electricity from air flow

Physics / General Physics

created 17 hours ago | popularity 3.9 / 5 (8) | comments 2

A group of researchers at the City College of New York is developing a new way to generate power for planes and automobiles based on materials known as piezoelectrics, which convert the kinetic energy of motion into electricity. ...


Nuclear weapons: Predicting the unthinkable

Physics / General Physics

created 18 hours ago | popularity 2.3 / 5 (4) | comments 1

If a nuclear weapon were detonated in a metropolitan area, how large would the affected area be? Where should first responders first go? According to physicist Fernando Grinstein, we have some initial understanding to address ...


Butterfly proboscis to sip cells

Physics / General Physics

created 15 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

A butterfly's proboscis looks like a straw -- long, slender, and used for sipping -- but it works more like a paper towel, according to Konstantin Kornev of Clemson University. He hopes to borrow the tricks of this piece ...


Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang (AP)

Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 21, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (18) | comments 19

(AP) -- Scientists are preparing the world's largest atom smasher to explore the depths of matter after successfully restarting the $10 billion machine following more than a year of repairs.