Study may solve age-old mystery of missing chemicals from Earth's mantle

December 5, 2007

Observations about the early formation of Earth may answer an age-old question about why the planet’s mantle is missing some of the matter that should be present, according to UBC geophysicist John Hernlund.

Earth is made from chondrite, very primitive rocks of meteorites that date from the earliest time of the solar system before the Earth was formed. However, scientists have been puzzled why the composition of Earth’s mantle and core differed from that of chondrite.

Hernlund’s findings suggest that an ancient magma ocean swirled beneath the Earth’s surface and would account for the discrepancy.

“As the thick melted rock cooled and crystallized, the solids that resulted had a different composition than the melt,” explains Hernlund, a post-doctoral fellow at UBC Earth and Ocean Sciences.

“The melt held onto some of the elements. This would be where the missing elements of chondrite are stored.”

He says this layer of molten rock would have been around 1,000 km thick and 2,900 km beneath the surface.”

Published in today’s edition of the journal Nature, Hernlund’s study explores the melting and crystallization processes that have controlled the composition of the Earth's interior over geological time. Co-authors are Stéphane Labrosse, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon and Nicolas Coltice, Université de Lyon.

The centre of Earth is a fiery core of melted heavy metals, mostly iron. This represents 30 per cent while the remaining 70 per cent is the outer mantle of solid rock.

Traditional views hold that a shallow ocean of melted rock (magma) existed 1,000 km below the Earth’s surface, but it was short lived and gone by 10 million years after the formation of Earth.

In contrast, Hernlund’s evolutionary model predicts that during Earth’s hotter past shortly after its formation 4.5 billion years ago, at least one-third of the mantle closest to the core was also melted.

Source: University of British Columbia

• brant - Dec 05, 2007
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
  "why the planets mantle is missing some of the matter that should be present,"
  
  Is an assumption that your model accurately represents reality.
  
  Obviously it doesnt.
  Time to look at your model instead of forcing some other results to fit your models lacking.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• out7x - Dec 06, 2007
  • Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
  Petrology is a major field of study in geology.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Trippy - Jan 24, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
  Yeah... Imagine the audacity of suggesting that the melted area might have been bigger then previously expected, the sheer nerve of someone suggesting that mixing might have occured in a liquid, and that differential crystalization might actually have occured.
  
  (For anyone who's in doubt - Wiki's page on it http://en.wikiped..._melting )
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5