The end to a mystery?
January 31, 2008
Astronomers at the University of St Andrews believe they can “simplify the dark side of the universe” by shedding new light on two of its mysterious constituents.
Dr HongSheng Zhao, of the University’s School of Physics and Astronomy, has shown that the puzzling dark matter and its counterpart dark energy may be more closely linked than was previously thought.
Only 4% of the universe is made of known material - the other 96% is traditionally labelled into two sectors, dark matter and dark energy.
A British astrophysicist and Advanced Fellow of the UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council, Dr Zhao points out, “Both dark matter and dark energy could be two faces of the same coin.
“As astronomers gain understanding of the subtle effects of dark energy in galaxies in the future, we will solve the mystery of astronomical dark matter at the same time. “
Astronomers believe that both the universe and galaxies are held together by the gravitational attraction of a huge amount of unseen material, first noted by the Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky in 1933, and now commonly referred to as dark matter.
Dr Zhao reports that, "Dark energy has already revealed its presence by masking as dark matter 60 years ago if we accept that dark matter and dark energy are linked phenomena that share a common origin.”
In Dr Zhao’s model, dark energy and dark matter are simply different manifestations of the same thing, which he has considered as a ‘dark fluid’. On the scale of galaxies, this dark fluid behaves like matter and on the scale of the Universe overall as dark energy, driving the expansion of the Universe. Importantly, his model, unlike some similar work, is detailed enough to produce the same 3:1 ratio of dark energy to dark matter as is predicted by cosmologists.
Efforts are currently underway to hunt for very massive dark-matter particles with a variety of experiments. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva is a particle accelerator that amongst other objectives, could potentially detect dark matter particles.
According to Dr Zhao, these efforts could turn out to be fruitless. He said, "In this simpler picture of universe, the dark matter would be at a surprisingly low energy scale, too low to be probed by upcoming Large Hadron Collider.
“The search for dark-matter particles so far has concentrated on highly-energetic particles. If dark matter however is a twin phenomenon of dark energy, it will not show up at instruments like the LHC, but has been seen over and over again in galaxies by astronomers."
However, the Universe might be absent of dark-matter particles at all. The findings of Dr Zhao are also compatible with an interpretation of the dark component as a modification of the law of gravity rather than particles or energy.
Dr Zhao concluded. “No matter what dark matter and dark energy are, these two phenomena are likely not independent of each other.”
Dr Zhao and his collaborators' findings have recently been published by Astrophysical Journal Letters in December 2007, and Physics Review D. 2007.
Theories of the physics of gravity were first developed by Isaac Newton in 1687 and refined by Albert Einstein's theory of General Relativity in 1905 which stated that the speed of gravity is equal to the speed of light.
However, Einstein was never fully decided on whether his equation should add an omnipresent constant source, now called dark energy in general.
Astronomers following Fred Zwicky have also speculated additional sources to Einstein's equation in the form of non-light emitting material, called dark matter in general.
Apart from very light neutrinos neither dark sources have been confirmed experimentally.
Source: Science and Technology Facilities Council
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Thinking of it that way... doesn't it seem plausible that dark matter is the fabric of space?
We need to go back to the basics and re-examine key experiments with much newer / better equipment than was available 100-200 years ago when some of the first tenets were laid down (before the advent of nuclear and plasma physics, before electricity was widely understood).
Just my opinion, of course.
deatopmg: Totally incorrect. No measurement has been made for the "speed of gravity", and indirect evidence agrees with GR that it propagate at the speed of light. Experimental evidence is not ignored, but constantly improved upon and retested. See http://math.ucr.e...nts.html for details.
All I can say is WOW, you figured it out, it's the boogeyman that did it!!!!!!!!