Racing Ahead at the Speed of Light

February 6, 2008 Racing Ahead at the Speed of Light

RHICs 2.4 mile ring has six intersection points where its two rings of accelerating magnets cross, allowing the particle beams to collide. The collisions produce the fleeting signals that, when captured by one of RHICs experimental detectors, provide physicists with information about the most fundamental workings of nature.

Imagine trying to catch up to something moving close to the speed of light - the fastest anything can move - and sending ahead information in time to make mid-path flight corrections. Impossible? Not quite. Physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), a particle accelerator at the U.S. Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory, have achieved this tricky task - and the results may save the Lab money and time in their quest to understand the inner workings of the early universe.

The physicists have developed a way to measure subtle fluctuations in RHIC's particle beams as they speed around their 2.4-mile-circumference high-tech racetrack - and send that information ahead to specialized devices that smooth the fluctuations when the beam arrives.

"These corrections help to keep the beams focused and colliding, recreating thousands of times a second the conditions that existed just after the Big Bang," said Steven Vigdor, Brookhaven Lab's Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear and Particle Physics, who manages the RHIC program.

Already, RHIC scientists have learned that mere microseconds after the Big Bang, the universe was more interesting than imagined - a nearly "perfect" liquid with virtually no viscosity and strong interactions among its constituents. With the ability to race ahead of RHIC's beams and keep them focused, the scientists will be able to create many more "mini-Bangs" for study. The increase in data will help them investigate and measure the detailed properties of this "perfect" liquid, and test certain predictions stimulated by an unanticipated link between RHIC findings and "string theory," an appealing approach to incorporate gravity into a unified theory that describes all of Nature's forces.

The beam-correcting technique, called stochastic cooling, has been implemented at accelerators where the beams are made of a continuous stream of particles - but never before at a facility where the particles travel in discrete bunches, as is necessary for the beam-on-beam collisions that take place at RHIC. "Its successful demonstration at RHIC provides an alternative path to the goal of increased collision rates, which would be much more costly and take longer to achieve via other proposed means," Vigdor said.

How it works

RHIC circulates two beams of ions - electrically charged particles - moving in opposite directions in two separate rings at 99.995 percent the speed of light. Within each beam, the ions travel in discrete groups, or "bunches," each containing more than a billion ions.

In the highest-energy experiments, the ions are the nuclei of gold atoms, composed of protons and neutrons that slam together where the two beams cross to produce a tiny speck of extremely hot, dense matter that mimics the conditions of the early universe.

But like all charged particle beams, RHIC's ions tend to spread out (heat up) as they circulate. As the ions spread, the number of protons and neutrons colliding - and the amount of useful data - declines.

So RHIC physicists are taking advantage of RHIC's circular shape and the ability to send signals as fast as the near-light-speed beam to cool the ions down - that is, keep them tightly bunched.

The technique includes the term stochastic (derived from statistics, meaning random) because it relies on measuring the random fluctuations in the beam shape and size. The measurements are made at one point on the accelerator by devices that generate signals proportional to how far the particles are straying from their ideal positions. These devices then send the signals via fiberoptic or microwave links to a position ahead of the speeding beam, where electric fields are generated to "kick" the charged particles back toward their ideal positions. The result: more tightly squeezed, cooler ion bunches.

The signals stay ahead of the beam by taking one of two shortcuts - either traveling from one point to another across the circular accelerator, or by backtracking along the circle to meet the speeding beam about halfway around on its next pass.

So far the RHIC physicists have tested stochastic cooling in the longitudinal direction - along the direction of the beam - in one of RHIC's two rings. Longitudinal cooling compensates for the ion bunches' tendency to lengthen as they circulate. This improvement has already increased RHIC's heavy-ion collision rate by 20 percent. Next, the physicists will test the same cooling system in RHIC's other ring.

With $7 million in additional funding, the physicists will design and build a similar system for correcting the tendency of RHIC's ion bunches also to become "fatter" as they circulate. Computer simulations, which have accurately predicted the achievements of the longitudinal cooling system, predict that combining this new transverse cooling system with longitudinal cooling in both rings and some additional equipment could increase collision rates overall by 500 percent.

"This achievement would compare quite favorably with the goals of our original plan for upgrading collision rates based on a system known as electron cooling, which we estimate would have cost $95 million," said Vigdor. Plus, stochastic cooling can be implemented much more quickly than adding an electron-cooling accelerator because no new construction is required.

"Barring unforeseen budget or technical problems, we hope to implement the full stochastic cooling system by 2011," Vigdor said.

Source: Brookhaven National Laboratory


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.2 /5 (47 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • quantum_flux - Feb 06, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "Imagine trying to catch up to something moving close to the speed of light - the fastest anything can move - and sending ahead information in time to make mid-path flight corrections."

    Making mid-path flight corrections when traveling near the speed of light would take a lot of energy unless you had some way to measure your position. Of course, the resulting trajectory would be unpredictable so you'd have to measure your position until you had the momentum you wanted. ;-)

    Nah, just toying with ideas.... aiming for a small slit with a near light speeding rocket ship is prepostorous! Better aim correctly the first time around.
  • gopher65 - Feb 06, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    The author of this article has no idea what they are talking about. They don't "send the corrections ahead in time". There is no time travel involved, which seems to be what the author of this article is insinuating.

    Simply put, they are using a circular accelerator. They make a measurement of the errors in the beam, calculate what changes need to be made on average to the beam, and then send the necessary corrections down a cable IN THE DIRECTION OPPOSITE TO THAT OF THE BEAM, to correction instruments that are now in front of the beam, since the beam is travelling in a circle.

    Honestly, did the person who wrote this even read the press release, or did they just make a bunch of random stuff up, and then copy and paste a few quotes in? Cause that's what it reads like.
  • Ashibayai - Feb 06, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    It's ahead of time if you consider the predicted time that the beam will be in a particular place.

    No time travel, just prediction and interception.
  • manifespo - Feb 07, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Follow my train of thought,
    is c is the fastest anything can move?
    or is it the fastest we can perceive?

    It seems to me, just a humble non-physicist,
    that the universe is simultaneously generating itself on all scales at every place in space.

    It seems to me that the universe moves at the speed of omni!

    Tap into the OmniTaneous OmniPoint Energy
  • earls - Feb 09, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "It seems to me, just a humble non-physicist,
    that the universe is simultaneously generating itself on all scales"

    Thank you. It seems to me that as long as the Universe continues to defy and break our "laws" of physics that we're definitely missing something.

    e = mc^2

    The speed of light. Squared.

    The speed of light. Squared.

    The speed of light. Squared?

    Yes, maybe I am just that dumb. But it seems to me that if "we" "they" "you" had all the answers, I would have a hoverboard. But I don't, so I can only assume there is a vast plateau of knowledge waiting to be reached.

    The speed of light "barrier" is just a limitation ... of Einstein's theory. Much like the speed of light has a maximum momentum, so did Einstein's perspective. He certainly couldn't see everything.

    Bottom line is, 2/9/08, 8:19 EST, earls is telling you and the rest of the world the speed of light barrier was built to be broken. And it will be.

    1/5

February 6, 2008 all stories

Comments: 5

4.2 /5 (47 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Fire Meets Ice: Superhot And Supercold Remarkably Similar In The 'Fermion' World (w/ Video)
    created Aug 04, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Physicists Receive Patent for Improved Cancer Therapy Device
    created Nov 24, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • ORNL 'deep retrofits' can cut home energy bills in half
    created 8 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Beer Here
    created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Seeking a Smarter Grid: Integrating Wind Energy by Linking Buildings to the Grid
    created Nov 24, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Microwave vs metallic objects
    created 1hour ago
  • Newtons law questions (rocket)
    created 3 hours ago
  • Contrails/Vapor on plane wings? confused..
    created 3 hours ago
  • Elementary question involving turkey thaw process!
    created 7 hours ago
  • Spin Polarization
    created 9 hours ago
  • Entropy
    created 9 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

Scientists react as they stand in front of a screen at CERN

First atoms reported smashed in Large Hadron Collider (Update)

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (30) | comments 21

Two circulating beams on Monday produced the first particle collisions in the world's biggest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), three days after its restart, scientists announced.


Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang (AP)

Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 21, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (18) | comments 26

(AP) -- Scientists are preparing the world's largest atom smasher to explore the depths of matter after successfully restarting the $10 billion machine following more than a year of repairs.


nuclear power plant

Doubts raised on nuclear industry viability

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 19, 2009 | popularity 3.1 / 5 (21) | comments 19

(PhysOrg.com) -- The investment in nuclear power has been growing around the world over the last few years, being viewed as a means for countries to control their energy security, avoid the price fluctuations ...


In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (33) | comments 9

Having a tough time recalling a phone number someone spoke a few minutes ago or forgetting items from a mental grocery list is not a sign of mental decline; in fact, it's natural.


Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 18, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (20) | comments 9

A recent experiment at the DOE's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has found that a proton's nearest neighbors in the nucleus of the atom may modify the proton's internal structure.