Prolific Spammer's Conviction Upheld

February 29, 2008 By LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- A divided Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the nation's first felony conviction for illegal spamming on Friday, ruling that Virginia's anti-spamming law does not violate free-speech rights.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


Bluebeat to battle EMI over Beatles songs

created 14 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Sea lions killed, but Columbia salmon toll rises

created 16 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

Google's desire to scan old books has critics casting it as Goliath

created Nov 06, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (5) | comments 5

BetOnSports.com founder gets 4-plus years

created Nov 02, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

New group helps US monitor swine flu shot safety

created Nov 02, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (19 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • superhuman - Feb 29, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Great! I hate spam as it wastes my time everyday and time is the most precious of all the things that we have.
  • fleem - Mar 01, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Since obviously multiple states were involved, I hope the prosecution picked the state with the greatest punishment. Also, it seems the false source email addresses that appear in a spam is certainly mail fraud across state boundaries, so I'm surprised this wasn't a federal case.
  • VideograhyLab - Mar 02, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    It's just the beginning. The US Supreme Court will have to weigh in ??????????

    Than offshore spammers will have to be addressed.
    We foresee a long litigation ahead.
  • novakyu - Mar 02, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Unfortunately, this is a Pyrrhic victory. In the long term, this will not stop spams in our mailbox (spammers will just move their operation to whichever state/country has laxest laws; solution to spam must be anything but legal---perhaps technological, or perhaps procedural, but not legal), and we just saw our free speech rights erode right in front of our eyes.

    There's the concept of "canary in a coal mine". This is one more group that cannot exercise their free speech rights---and who says that the next cannot be the political minority, or, for example, those who say things that, in the opinion of the popular mob, the children shouldn't hear?

    I hate to agree (as I don't like spam as much as anybody) with the dissenting judges and the defense lawyer, but I do. This is a great blow to the American civil rights.
  • JDB - Mar 03, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I disagree. E-mail uses the computer memory (private resources) of the receiver, not the sender! It would be as if someone came into your home, printed out an advertisment or political/religious pamphlet from your printer on your paper with your ink (all of which [computer memory, paper, ink]) are YOUR resources! People are free to promote their own personal agendas under the First Amendment, but they should not be allowed to commandeer another person's resources to do so, that is theft!
  • billstewart - Mar 03, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    As far as I can tell from the press reports, the majority of the judges were wrong - this spam is clearly interstate commerce, and therefore not subject to Virginia state jurisdiction any more than postal junk mail advertising similarly bogus products. The spammer may not have argued his case well, and Virginia law has some bad precedents (because other people have spammed AOL users in the past), and his arguments on free speech and vagueness were bogus enough that his lawyer should have known better than to try them - but the jurisdictional issues were solid. If the prosecution could show that the spammer was using cracked computers located in Virginia to send some of the spam to other locations in Virginia (i.e. AOL's servers), that would be a different case, but it appears that he sent the spam directly from North Carolina.

    AOL could still use the Federal "CAN SPAM" law to stop him - it's weak, and easy for spammers to work around, but it doesn't look like this spammer bothered to comply with it, since it was easier to just try to not get caught (loser.)

    Spam is annoying, and it does cost money if you're an email service provider, but the real cost to the recipients isn't the near-zero cost of having some of the ones and zeros in their computers represent junk mail - it's the wasted time of the recipients and the interference with real email.

February 29, 2008 all stories

Comments: 6

4.6 /5 (19 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Relative pressure & specific volume
    created 7 hours ago
  • Making 4'x8' sign inkjet printer - need nozzles - help?
    created Nov 06, 2009
  • Calculating Velocity
    created Nov 06, 2009
  • shear stress distribution in triangular steel profile
    created Nov 06, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - General Engineering

Other News

Microsoft websites were the most visited in September

Microsoft websites top spots in September: comScore

Technology / Internet

created 15 hours ago | popularity 2.3 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Industry tracker comScore on Friday released a study showing that Internet users in September spent more time at Microsoft websites that at any other online properties.


Brazil blackouts result of cyber hacking: report

Technology / Internet

created 15 hours ago | popularity 2.5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Massive power outages in Brazil in 2005 and 2007 that impacted millions were caused by cyber hackers attacking control systems, the US television network CBS said Sunday.


The Beatles perform in 1964 at the Olympia in Paris

Bluebeat to battle EMI over Beatles songs

Technology / Internet

created 14 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

US online music service Bluebeat said it plans to fight British recording label EMI over rights to stream and sell versions of Beatles songs.


airpod

Car That Runs on Compressed Air Questioned by Critics (w/ Video)

Technology / Energy

created Nov 03, 2009 | popularity 3.8 / 5 (18) | comments 26

(PhysOrg.com) -- As electric cars begin breaking into the short-distance vehicle market, one French company thinks that it has an alternative to the electric vehicle: a car that runs on compressed air. Motor ...


Sahara

Will Europe Be Powered by the Sahara

Technology / Energy

created Nov 04, 2009 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (19) | comments 24

(PhysOrg.com) -- Europe has long been interested in developing alternative energy sources. And, one of the more interesting places that some Europeans are looking for solar power is the Sahara. With the vast ...