Prolific Spammer's Conviction Upheld

February 29, 2008 By LARRY O'DELL, Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- A divided Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the nation's first felony conviction for illegal spamming on Friday, ruling that Virginia's anti-spamming law does not violate free-speech rights.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


Court won't revive Va. anti-spam law

created Mar 30, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Bill would counter Supreme Court age bias ruling

created Oct 06, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

US appeals court nixes Internet gambling challenge

created Sep 01, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Ariz. court rules records law covers 'metadata'

created Oct 29, 2009 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Appeals court orders new trial in Brocade case

created Aug 18, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (19 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • superhuman - Feb 29, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Great! I hate spam as it wastes my time everyday and time is the most precious of all the things that we have.
  • fleem - Mar 01, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Since obviously multiple states were involved, I hope the prosecution picked the state with the greatest punishment. Also, it seems the false source email addresses that appear in a spam is certainly mail fraud across state boundaries, so I'm surprised this wasn't a federal case.
  • VideograhyLab - Mar 02, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    It's just the beginning. The US Supreme Court will have to weigh in ??????????

    Than offshore spammers will have to be addressed.
    We foresee a long litigation ahead.
  • novakyu - Mar 02, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Unfortunately, this is a Pyrrhic victory. In the long term, this will not stop spams in our mailbox (spammers will just move their operation to whichever state/country has laxest laws; solution to spam must be anything but legal---perhaps technological, or perhaps procedural, but not legal), and we just saw our free speech rights erode right in front of our eyes.

    There's the concept of "canary in a coal mine". This is one more group that cannot exercise their free speech rights---and who says that the next cannot be the political minority, or, for example, those who say things that, in the opinion of the popular mob, the children shouldn't hear?

    I hate to agree (as I don't like spam as much as anybody) with the dissenting judges and the defense lawyer, but I do. This is a great blow to the American civil rights.
  • JDB - Mar 03, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I disagree. E-mail uses the computer memory (private resources) of the receiver, not the sender! It would be as if someone came into your home, printed out an advertisment or political/religious pamphlet from your printer on your paper with your ink (all of which [computer memory, paper, ink]) are YOUR resources! People are free to promote their own personal agendas under the First Amendment, but they should not be allowed to commandeer another person's resources to do so, that is theft!
  • billstewart - Mar 03, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    As far as I can tell from the press reports, the majority of the judges were wrong - this spam is clearly interstate commerce, and therefore not subject to Virginia state jurisdiction any more than postal junk mail advertising similarly bogus products. The spammer may not have argued his case well, and Virginia law has some bad precedents (because other people have spammed AOL users in the past), and his arguments on free speech and vagueness were bogus enough that his lawyer should have known better than to try them - but the jurisdictional issues were solid. If the prosecution could show that the spammer was using cracked computers located in Virginia to send some of the spam to other locations in Virginia (i.e. AOL's servers), that would be a different case, but it appears that he sent the spam directly from North Carolina.

    AOL could still use the Federal "CAN SPAM" law to stop him - it's weak, and easy for spammers to work around, but it doesn't look like this spammer bothered to comply with it, since it was easier to just try to not get caught (loser.)

    Spam is annoying, and it does cost money if you're an email service provider, but the real cost to the recipients isn't the near-zero cost of having some of the ones and zeros in their computers represent junk mail - it's the wasted time of the recipients and the interference with real email.

February 29, 2008 all stories

Comments: 6

4.6 /5 (19 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Aspiring Engineering major looking for general answers
    created Nov 19, 2009
  • Calculating max load of square tube (steel)
    created Nov 19, 2009
  • Passive Chemical Heating
    created Nov 19, 2009
  • Shortening Boat Trailer
    created Nov 18, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - General Engineering

Other News

Suit over search-engine keywords tries new angle

Technology / Internet

created 15 hours ago | popularity 2.5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

(AP) -- A lawsuit in Wisconsin is bringing a fresh challenge to the practice of paying for keywords on Google and other search engines to boost one company's link over a rival's.


Trust Linux!

Trust Linux!

Technology / Software

created 22 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of researchers has implemented support for 'trusted computing' in a commercially available version of the open source operating system Linux, breaking new ground in the global drive ...


Screen of a computer featuring a search of the word "edition" on the home page of Google's website

Google books hearing set for February 18

Technology / Internet

created 17 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

A US judge set February 18 for a hearing on the revised legal settlement between Google and US authors and publishers that would allow the Internet giant to scan and sell millions of books online.


Newspapers are displayed at a newsstand

US newspaper ad revenue down nearly 28 percent

Technology / Business

created 16 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

US newspaper advertising revenue fell by nearly 28 percent in the third quarter, continuing a slide which has led to layoffs, bankruptcies and the closure of several dailies.


Cisco has released a Web security app for iPhone

Cisco releases Web security app for iPhone

Technology / Software

created 18 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Cisco on Friday announced the release of a free iPhone application for anyone who wants to stay on top of the latest trojans, worms, or other threats marauding on the Internet.