Death of massive star creates brightest burst ever seen

March 20, 2008 Record gamma ray burst explosion

The extremely luminous afterglow of GRB 080319B was imaged by Swift's X-ray Telescope (left) and Optical/Ultraviolet Telescope (right). This was by far the brightest gamma-ray burst afterglow ever seen. Credit: NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler, et al.

Gamma-Ray Bursts are the most powerful explosive events in the Universe. They occur in far-off galaxies and so are usually faint. But on the morning of March 19th 2008 the Swift satellite found a burst which was so bright it could have been seen without binoculars or a telescope even though it was seven thousand times further away than the Andromeda galaxy.

The burst was discovered by the Swift satellite on a fantastic day for GRB hunters. Swift typically finds only two a week; but for the first time Swift found five bursts within 24 hours. The second burst of the day is the new record holder. The enormous energy released in the explosion – brighter than the light from all of the stars in five million Milky Way Galaxies – was caused by the death of a massive star which collapsed to form a black hole.

Dr. Julian Osborne of the University of Leicester, lead investigator for the Swift UK Science Data Centre, said “It’s great to find so many GRBs in one day, and the discovery of the brightest burst ever seen will allow us to explore this incredible explosion in exquisite detail.”

The location of the burst was rapidly pinpointed using the UK-built X-ray and Optical cameras on Swift. Dr. Paul O’Brien, also of the University of Leicester and a member of the Swift Science Team said, “The explosion happened at a distance of over twenty billion light years from Earth. To detect a naked eye object from such a distance really is extraordinary.”

Astronomers around the world are now observing the decaying glow from this burst as it fades away. These include UK teams from the Universities of Leicester, Warwick and Hertfordshire using the Gemini-North Telescope in Hawaii and the Liverpool John Moores University using the Liverpool Telescope on La Palma in the Canary Islands.

Professor Nial Tanvir, of the University of Leicester, said: “Our Gemini observations allowed us to measure the distance to the GRB, and to investigate the behaviour of gas close to the burst as it was blasted by the energy of the explosion”.

Source: University of Leicester


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (51 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • drel - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
    %u201CThe explosion happened at a distance of over twenty billion light years from Earth."

    "it was seven thousand times further away than the Andromeda galaxy." (2.5 million * 7,000 = 17.5 billion)

    So is it 20 Billion or 17.5 billion?

    I thought the current estimated age of the universe is 13.7 billion years so how could it be either?

    If this GRB is shown to be older than the current estimated age of the universe, is that not an important news story in itself?
  • franl - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    The expansion of the universe makes measuring (and expressing) distances confusing. I found a good explaination at this Web page: http://www.atlaso...ift.html

    The gist of the explaination is this: Two galaxies are near to each other when the universe is only 1 billion years old. The first galaxy emits a pulse of light. The second galaxy does not receive the pulse until the universe is 14 billion years old. By this time, the galaxies are separated by about 26 billion light years; the pulse of light has been traveling for 13 billion years; and the view the people receive in the second galaxy is an image of the first galaxy when it was only 1 billion years old and when it was only about 2 billion light years away.
  • downdiagonal - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
    @drel: Even if the universe was not expanding, you would expect the radius to be 13.7 billion light years and the diameter to be double that: 27.4 billion light years. The universe is expanding, so the starting point of a photon reaching us today after travelling for 13.7 billion years is now 78 billion light years away. The diameter of the universe is 156 billion light years
  • drel - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    ok, i get what your saying, but when (how long ago) did the massive star collapse?
    (please don't say on the morning of March 19th 2008 - lol)
  • enginarc - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
    ok, i get what your saying, but when (how long ago) did the massive star collapse?
    (please don't say on the morning of March 19th 2008 - lol)

    good question
  • fleem - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
    Erm, no, the %u201CThe explosion happened at a distance of over twenty billion light years from Earth" is simply inconsistent with our current understanding of cosmology. Somebody has made a mistake.
  • gopher65 - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
    No fleem. It is as stated in the posts above. The problem comes because there are multiple ways of specifying distance due to the expansion of the universe. Mainly these three:

    1) Original distance between two points when the photon was emitted
    2) Current distance between two points as if the universe could be seen from a global frame of reference (that seems what they are using in the article)
    3) Current distance between two points as a percentage of the current light radius of the visible universe (13.7 billion light years).

    Number 3 is what is normally used, but either of the other two can be used if you are in the mood for funkiness.
  • dirk_bruere - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
    How about less handwaving in these reports and some *************NUMBERS*************
  • Wasara - Mar 20, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Check this NASA link:

    http://www.nasa.g...GRB.html

  • drel - Mar 21, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Thank you Wasara. From your provided link the answer is 7.5 Billion years ago.
  • Ragtime - Mar 21, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    It would be interesting to compare this event with MAGIC observation, during which the Lorentz symmetry violation has been observed reportedly.

    If the theories are correct, then the moment of gamma burst arrival should be quite significantly delayed towards the flash in the visible range.
  • trantor - Apr 12, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    I can just imagine what happened to any living creature in that galaxy, only a a few thousands of light years from this collapsing star.

    back in that time, I guess such massive stars were much more common than today... maybe the inhabitants of that galaxy are TODAY watching powerful gamma ray bursts from stars in the Milky Way galaxy... stars that exploded (or imploded) even before the Sun existed. Since the light of such explosions passed by the Sun 7.5 billion years ago, we will never know about them. But aliens living at vast distances will see the Milky Way past.

March 20, 2008 all stories

Comments: 12

4.6 /5 (51 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Astronomers explore 'last blank space' on map of the Universe
    created Oct 28, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Blast from the Past Gives Clues About Early Universe
    created Oct 28, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Keck Study Sheds New Light on "Dark" Gamma-ray Bursts
    created Jun 08, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • New Gamma-Ray Burst Smashes Cosmic Distance Record (w/Video)
    created Apr 28, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Obama's regulatory plan doesn't go far enough, says UCSC economist
    created Mar 26, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Black hole confusion
    created 23 hours ago
  • Moon tied to Earth
    created Nov 13, 2009
  • Water on the Moon!
    created Nov 13, 2009
  • Is it possible for a single super-massive black hole...
    created Nov 13, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

Other News

NASA on track for Monday space shuttle launch (AP)

NASA on track for Monday space shuttle launch

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 7 hours ago | popularity 3 / 5 (1) | comments 0

(AP) -- NASA has cleared space shuttle Atlantis for liftoff Monday on a trip to stock up the International Space Station with several years' worth of spare parts.


Wind power turbines in Dali, in China's southwestern Yunnan province

China tipped as global leader in green tech

Space & Earth / Environment

created 19 hours ago | popularity 3.3 / 5 (3) | comments 5

China can become the world's top exporter of "green technology" if it carries out crucial energy and ecological reforms, leading environmental campaigners said here Saturday.


French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER) team prepares to put in water the robot BOB

Underwater robot probes depths for Istanbul quake clues

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 19 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (4) | comments 0

A state-of-the-art underwater robot called BOB may hold the key to protecting millions of people around Turkey's biggest city against a massive earthquake scientists say is all but inevitable.


LCROSS Impact Data Indicates Water on Moon

LCROSS Impact Finds Water on the Moon

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created Nov 13, 2009 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (26) | comments 10

(PhysOrg.com) -- The argument that the moon is a dry, desolate place no longer holds water. Secrets the moon has been holding, for perhaps billions of years, are now being revealed to the delight of scientists ...


Controversial new climate change results

Controversial new climate change results

Space & Earth / Environment

created Nov 10, 2009 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (37) | comments 79

(PhysOrg.com) -- New data show that the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of CO2 has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of CO2 having risen from about 2 billion ...