Graphene gazing gives glimpse of foundations of universe

April 3, 2008 Fine Structure Constant Measured from Opacity of Graphene Membranes

Magnified image of research samples with small holes covered by graphene. One can see light passing through them by the naked eye. Credit: University of Manchester

Researchers at The University of Manchester have used graphene to measure an important and mysterious fundamental constant - and glimpse the foundations of the universe.

The researchers from The School of Physics and Astronomy, led by Professor Andre Geim, have found that the world’s thinnest material absorbs a well-defined fraction of visible light, which allows the direct determination of the fine structure constant.

Working with Portuguese theorists from The University of Minho in Portugal, Geim and colleagues report their findings online in the latest edition of Science Express. The paper will be published in the journal Science in the coming weeks.

The universe and life on this planet are intimately controlled by several exact numbers; so-called fundamental or universal constants such as the speed of light and the electric charge of an electron.

Among them, the fine structure constant is arguably most mysterious. It defines the interaction between very fast moving electrical charges and light – or electromagnetic waves – and its exact value is close to 1/137.

Prof Geim, who in 2004 discovered graphene with Dr Kostya Novoselov, a one-atom-thick gauze of carbon atoms resembling chicken wire, says: “Change this fine tuned number by only a few percent and the life would not be here because nuclear reactions in which carbon is generated from lighter elements in burning stars would be forbidden. No carbon means no life.”

Geim now working together with PhD students Rahul Nair and Peter Blake have for the first time produced large suspended membranes of graphene so that one can easily see light passing through this thinnest of all materials.

The researchers have found the carbon monolayer is not crystal-clear but notably opaque, absorbing a rather large 2.3 percent of visible light. The experiments supported by theory show this number divided by Pi gives you the exact value of the fine structures constant.

The fundamental reason for this is that electrons in graphene behave as if they have completely lost their mass, as shown in the previous work of the Manchester group and repeated by many researchers worldwide.

The accuracy of the optical determination of the constant so far is relatively low, by metrological standards.

But researchers say the simplicity of the Manchester experiment is “truly amazing” as measurements of fundamental constants normally require sophisticated facilities and special conditions.

With large membranes in hand, Prof Geim says it requires barely anything more sophisticated then a camera to measure visual transparency of graphene.

“We were absolutely flabbergasted when realized that such a fundamental effect could be measured in such a simple way. One can have a glimpse of the very foundations of our universe just looking through graphene,” said Prof Geim.

“Graphene continues to surprise beyond the wildest imagination of the early days when we found this material.

“It works like a magic wand – whatever property or phenomenon you address with graphene, it brings you back a sheer magic.

“I was rather pessimistic about graphene-based technologies coming out of research labs any time soon. I have to admit I was wrong. They are coming sooner rather than later.”

Source: University of Manchester


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (83 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • NeilFarbstein - Apr 03, 2008
    • Rank: 1.3 / 5 (4)
    I would not be surprised if graphene supports superconductive effects since electrons in that material are "massless"
  • MikeMarianiMD,FAAP - Apr 03, 2008
    • Rank: 1.8 / 5 (6)
    When Prof Geim exclaims, %u201CChange this fine tuned number by only a few percent and the life would not be here because nuclear reactions in which carbon is generated from lighter elements in burning stars would be forbidden. No carbon means no life%u201D, surely he does not hope to explain to us that life as we know it requires carbon. Anyone even remotely interested in reading the content of this web site is aware that carbon is fundamental to life on Earth.

    Is this professor an expert in extraterrestrial life forms as well as physics?
    None the entities of which I am aware living in extra-cosmic realities is carbon based.
    Silicon?
    Honestly, I don%u2019t know. They really don%u2019t like to communicate with the arrogant members of H. sapiens.
    I think I know why.

  • THolley28 - Apr 03, 2008
    • Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
    I wonder if this is the reason why conductivity is so stupidly high in graphene. What if the weight of the electron does effect its movement therefore affecting electricity? And if that is the case, what if the differences the electrons exibit at less weight can tell us more about particle physics or quantum physics using the mathematical differences in electrical reaction? Some days I wish I actually had a degree to be able to play with the math on this.
  • out7x - Apr 04, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
    This article is truly nonsense.
  • taisha99 - Apr 04, 2008
    • Rank: 3.3 / 5 (3)
    Hi
    Right - who says all life must be carbon based. Only our VERY local experience and knowledge indicates that. Also idf the constant were different then perhaps something like silicon might behave exactly like carbon.
    Nevertheless. Interesting work.
    Ged
  • E_L_Earnhardt - Apr 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Inteligence will unravel inteligent design - bit by bit. Ignorance is blind by choice!
  • asiwel - Apr 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Odd about graphene being "not crystal-clear but notably opaque." I just read an article stating the graphene was the next outstanding new choice for LCD construction because it had much greater light transmission properties than current materials?
  • asiwel - Apr 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    That article from the Max Plank Insitute about graphene translucency (at least at infrared, better than iridium) is entitled "Carbon electrodes could slash cost of solar panels" 12:43 19 December 2007 from NewScientist.com news service. The "next thing" they were going to try improving was LCD panels.

April 3, 2008 all stories

Comments: 8

4.6 /5 (83 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories




  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • inertia
    created 1hour ago
  • Enthalpy and it's use in Gibb's Free Energy
    created 3 hours ago
  • Newton Question #2 (centripetal motion)
    created 6 hours ago
  • Microwave vs metallic objects
    created 6 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

Bacteria

Plasma produces KO cocktail for MRSA

Physics / General Physics

created 51 minutes ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) and other drug-resistant bacteria could face annihilation as low-temperature plasma prototype devices have been developed to offer safe, quick, easy and un ...


Scientists react as they stand in front of a screen at CERN

First atoms reported smashed in Large Hadron Collider (Update)

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (30) | comments 21

Two circulating beams on Monday produced the first particle collisions in the world's biggest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), three days after its restart, scientists announced.


Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang (AP)

Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 21, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (18) | comments 26

(AP) -- Scientists are preparing the world's largest atom smasher to explore the depths of matter after successfully restarting the $10 billion machine following more than a year of repairs.


nuclear power plant

Doubts raised on nuclear industry viability

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 19, 2009 | popularity 3.1 / 5 (21) | comments 19

(PhysOrg.com) -- The investment in nuclear power has been growing around the world over the last few years, being viewed as a means for countries to control their energy security, avoid the price fluctuations ...


In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (33) | comments 9

Having a tough time recalling a phone number someone spoke a few minutes ago or forgetting items from a mental grocery list is not a sign of mental decline; in fact, it's natural.