Toolbox
- size +

German whizzkid got it wrong: NASA

It was an incredible tale of a German schoolboy spotting a miscalculation by the US space agency, proving the chances of an asteroid hitting the Earth were higher than initially believed.
But the amazing story of the whizzkid versus the space bureaucracy turned out to be wrong, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration said Wednesday.

The agency, sounding a bit like a weary math teacher, said its figures are correct when it comes to the asteroid Apophis, not the boy's.

"We stand by our numbers," NASA spokesman Dwayne Brown told AFP.

The agency that oversees space shuttle missions and unmanned space probes issued a statement after the German newspaper Potsdamer Neuerster Nachrichten reported on Tuesday that student Nico Marquardt had calculated there was a 1 in 450 chance that the Apophis asteroid will collide with Earth.

He argued in his project for a regional science competition that scientists at NASA had got it wrong when they estimated the chances of a collision at only 1 in 45,000.

But experts at the agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California had no doubts about their calculations, Brown said.

The Near-Earth Object Program Office "has not changed its current estimates for the very low probability (1 in 45,000) of an Earth impact by the asteroid Apophis in 2036," Brown said in a statement.

And the newspaper's account was also inaccurate when it described NASA telling the European Space Agency that the German student's calculations were correct, Brown said.

"Contrary to recent press reports, NASA offices involved in near-Earth object research were not contacted and have had no correspondence with a young German student, who claims the Apophis impact probability is far higher than the current estimate," the statement said.

The student's estimates were reportedly based on the asteroid hitting a satellite in 2029.

"However, the asteroid will not pass near the main belt of geosynchronous satellites in 2029, and the chance of a collision with a satellite is exceedingly remote," it said.

While the German newspaper article had spread across the Internet, NASA said the probability of Apophis colliding with Earth remained at 1 in 45,000.

© 2008 AFP
» Next Article in Space & Earth science - Space Exploration: Hope Takes Flight on Shuttle Discovery

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4 out of 5 after 48 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by Dologan 04/17/08 09:21
Not rated yet.
So what happened? Publicity stunt by unscrupulous boy? Or media blunder/misrepresentation?
Posted by Modernmystic 04/17/08 09:40
Rank: 3.67/5 after 3 votes
I think it was media misrepresentation. From what I understand the original story came out in a German paper which is their equivalent of The Enquirer.
Posted by tomphys 04/17/08 11:29
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
Yeah, how accurate are the calculations of a 13 year old going to be? I'm sure it was an example of interesting thinking (which is good) being grossly misrepresented by the media.
As Feynman puts it, the reason the Media get it wrong is because you have people who study language (media) reporting on stuff that they do not understand
Posted by mrlewish 04/17/08 12:29
Rank: 3/5 after 2 votes
Reminds me of some 15 year old boys "research" on global warming whose website has be latched onto by global warming deniers as "proof I say proof"
Posted by holoman 04/17/08 13:18
Not rated yet.
NASA scientist competing with 13 year old boy ?
Posted by OregonWind 04/17/08 14:14
Not rated yet.
He got his time of fame! :)

Posted by ShadowRam 04/17/08 15:37
Not rated yet.
I believe Apophis will hit us.
Posted by MrFred 04/17/08 20:27
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
Yeah, thats mass media for you. Not interested in truth, just a story. Hence the readiness to publish the story before doing a little homework. Its barely anything more than just another form of entertainment anymore.
Posted by stclaires 04/18/08 16:42
Not rated yet.
I wonder who is correct. NASA or the 13 year old. They could both be right depending on which calculations are used.
Posted by tomphys 04/23/08 18:43
Not rated yet.
well not really, the only calculation which will be correct is the one that correctly describes the situation. The 13yr olds calculations hardly seem valid anymore