The Ultimate Test of Atom and Neutron Neutrality

April 17, 2008 By Laura Mgrdichian The Ultimate Test of Atom and Neutron Neutrality

The neutrality test experimental setup, showing the atoms´ trajectories.

Researchers from Stanford University have proposed a new way to test the neutrality of an atom and even a neutron, a method they say will be far more sensitive than current methods, able to probe the charge of an atom or neutron down to an unbelievably small fraction of the electron charge, e.

This experiment will help answer important questions about charge quantization. Why does the charge appear in units of the electron charge? Why do some particles have no charge? Do the electrons and protons in an atom really cancel out to zero charge?

These questions are not answered by the Standard Model, the established theory describing elementary particles, their properties, and how they relate to each other. The Stanford group states in their paper describing the experiment, published in the March 27, 2008, online edition of Physical Review Letters, that an alternative “Grand Unified” theory (“grand” because it links together the electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear forces into one neat package) can automatically explain charge quantization and atom neutrality.

Even so, they quickly point out that a magnetic monopole, a theoretical particle with only one magnetic pole (instead of two like a bar magnet), has been predicted to be able to carry an amount of non-quantized electric charge, under violations of the time reversal symmetry in the theory.

“This suggests that we have to rethink our notion of charge quantization and the conditions under which it holds,” said Stanford physicist Asimina Arvanitaki, the paper's corresponding author, to PhysOrg.com. Arvanitaki is also affiliated with the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

Arvanitaki and her colleagues expect that their experiment can greatly improve the sensitivity by which the charge on an atom can be measured: from 10-20e to 10-28e—in other words, a hundred million times better.

“This is similar to measuring the distance between the earth and the sun to an accuracy better than the size of a nucleus,” said Arvanitaki.

The experimental setup is a type of atom interferometer, an instrument designed to detect tiny differences between atoms by exploiting the wave nature of an atom—the phenomenon that a particle, like a light wave, has its own wavelength, described by a mathematical function called a wavefunction, as predicted by quantum mechanics.

The Stanford setup consists of a large vertical cylinder 10 meters tall with two smaller cylinders inside, also oriented vertically but with a gap between them. At the bottom of the device, rubidium atoms are launched vertically into the lower small cylinder with an initial velocity of 10 meters per second (m/s).

As the atoms stream upwards, a series of meticulously timed laser pulses act on the atoms like mirrors and beam-splitters, breaking up each atom's wavefunction into a superposition of two space-time trajectories with a difference in momentum. This results in a fast-moving wavefunction component and a slower component, which later recombine and interfere.

When “large momentum transfer” beamsplitting is realized, it can lead to a difference in momentum that corresponds to a velocity difference of 1 m/s. This means one component will go significantly higher than the other: The parabola-shaped trajectory of the fast component will extend into the upper of the two small cylinders, while the trajectory of the slow component will not leave the lower cylinder.

Taking advantage of this, the researchers can then introduce two regions of electric potential in the device: a positive voltage applied to the upper cylinder and a negative voltage applied to the lower. If the rubidium atom carries a small charge, the wavefunction components will react to the voltage in their respective cylinders, and a phase shift will be introduced between them, meaning one component will oscillate more times than the other.

This difference can be measurable. When the experiment is repeated a million times and for a million atoms at a time, the statistics are improved and even charges per nucleon of 10-28e can be detected.

The researchers discuss increasing the number of atoms to between 10 and 100 million or using entangled states of atoms, another technique that takes advantage of the quantum mechanical properties of atoms. These changes, they say, can lead to an even higher sensitivity of 10-30e.

Citation: Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120407 (2008)

Copyright 2008 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (45 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • blackdog - Apr 17, 2008
    • Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
    "...and a phase shift will be introduced between them, meaning one component will oscillate more times than the other."

    A phase shift does not affect the frequency but - as the word says - it only shifts the wave in time.
  • out7x - Apr 18, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    This is designed for electrons momentum differences. What about neutrons?
  • earls - Apr 24, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    What's the difference between a hydrogen atom and a neutron?

April 17, 2008 all stories

Comments: 3

4.6 /5 (45 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Researchers take the lead out of piezoelectrics
    created Nov 13, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • First Test of New X-ray Laser Strips Neon Bare
    created Sep 18, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Hot and Cold Moves of Cyanide and Water
    created Sep 08, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Hot and cold moves of cyanide and water
    created Sep 03, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Columbia Researchers Lead Race to Find Dark Matter
    created Jul 27, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Microwave vs metallic objects
    created 1hour ago
  • Newtons law questions (rocket)
    created 3 hours ago
  • Contrails/Vapor on plane wings? confused..
    created 3 hours ago
  • Elementary question involving turkey thaw process!
    created 8 hours ago
  • Spin Polarization
    created 9 hours ago
  • Entropy
    created 9 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

Scientists react as they stand in front of a screen at CERN

First atoms reported smashed in Large Hadron Collider (Update)

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (30) | comments 21

Two circulating beams on Monday produced the first particle collisions in the world's biggest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), three days after its restart, scientists announced.


Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang (AP)

Restored machine to explore mysteries of Big Bang

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 21, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (18) | comments 26

(AP) -- Scientists are preparing the world's largest atom smasher to explore the depths of matter after successfully restarting the $10 billion machine following more than a year of repairs.


nuclear power plant

Doubts raised on nuclear industry viability

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 19, 2009 | popularity 3.1 / 5 (21) | comments 19

(PhysOrg.com) -- The investment in nuclear power has been growing around the world over the last few years, being viewed as a means for countries to control their energy security, avoid the price fluctuations ...


In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

In the Brain, Seven Is A Magic Number

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (33) | comments 9

Having a tough time recalling a phone number someone spoke a few minutes ago or forgetting items from a mental grocery list is not a sign of mental decline; in fact, it's natural.


Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 18, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (20) | comments 9

A recent experiment at the DOE's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has found that a proton's nearest neighbors in the nucleus of the atom may modify the proton's internal structure.