Study examines amount of water needed to produce various types of energy

April 22, 2008

One 60-watt incandescent bulb may use up to 6,000 gallons of water a year.

It is easy to overlook that most of the energy we consume daily, such as electricity or natural gas, is produced with the help of a dwindling resource – fresh water. Virginia Tech professor Tamim Younos and undergraduate student Rachelle Hill are researching the water-efficiency of some of the most common energy sources and power generating methods.

Younos, associate director at the Virginia Water Resources Research Center based at Virginia Tech and research professor of water resources in the College of Natural Resources and undergraduate researcher Hill, of Round Hill, Va., majoring in environmental science and aquatic resource concentration, in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, have analyzed 11 types of energy sources, including coal, fuel ethanol, natural gas, and oil; and five power generating methods, including hydroelectric, fossil fuel thermoelectric, and nuclear methods.

Younos said they based their calculations on available governmental reports by using a standard measurement unit, which makes this study unique. “Our unit is gallons of water per British Thermal Unit (BTU),” explained Younos. “We selected BTU as a standard unit because it indicates pure energy as heat and is applicable to all energy production and power generation methods.”

According to the study, the most water-efficient energy sources are natural gas and synthetic fuels produced by coal gasification. The least water-efficient energy sources are fuel ethanol and biodiesel.

In terms of power generation, Younos and Hill have found that geothermal and hydroelectric energy types use the least amount of water, while nuclear plants use the most.

Hill took the study one step further and calculated how many gallons of water are required to burn one 60-watt incandescent light bulb for 12 hours a day, over the course of one year. She found that the bulb would consume between 3,000 and 6,000 gallons of water, depending on how water-efficient the power plant that supplies the electricity is.

Hill added that the results are estimates of the water consumption based on energy produced by fossil fuel thermoelectric plants, which produce most of the Unites State’s power – about 53 percent. “The numbers are even more staggering if you multiply the water consumed by the same light bulb by the approximately 111 million U.S. homes,” said Hill. “The water usage then gets as high as 655 billion gallons of water a year.”

By contrast, burning a compact fluorescent bulb for the same amount of time would save about 2,000 to 4,000 gallons of water per year.

Younos noted that the results of this analysis should be interpreted with a grain of salt. “There are several variables such as geography and climate, technology type and efficiency, and accuracy of measurements that come into play. However, by standardizing the measurement unit, we have been able to obtain a unique snapshot of the water used to produce different kinds of energy.”

This study is part of a multi-college partnership at Virginia Tech led by Younos that proposes a unique approach to managing water and energy resources, called the Decentralized Energy and Water Systems. Another research theme under the scrutiny by the Decentralized Energy and Water Systems scientists is to study rainwater harvesting as an alternative to using water from the public system for non-potable uses and the impact of rainwater harvesting on water and energy conservation and stormwater management.

The partnership’s team members at Virginia Tech include professors Younos, project leader and associate director at the center and research professor of water resources in the Department of Geography; Darrell Bosch, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics; Richard Hirsch, Consortium on Energy Restructuring; Vinod Lohani, Department of Engineering Education; Madeline Schreiber, Department of Geosciences; and Monica Licher doctoral student in environmental design and planning.

Source: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

• Neum - Apr 22, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
  I wonder what the authors of this study actually mean by "used" water. If they mean that "used" water is evaporated to the atmosphere or rendered unusable by some other means, that is one thing. But water used to cool a nuclear plant or any other thermoelectric generator is usually and mostly returned to the body of water from whence it came albiet slightly warmer than it was.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• WolfAtTheDoor - Apr 22, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
  The longer this alternative energy debate rages, the more I am convinced the ultimate answer lies in the direct conversion of matter into energy.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• trantor - Apr 23, 2008
  • Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
  which type of ethanol are they considering? Sugar cane is much more efficient to turn into ethanol than corn or beat!
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Modernmystic - Apr 23, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  Pffft....yeah I have to agree with Neum I'm having a REALLY hard time trying to figure out how nuclear got where it was on the list.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5