Finding God with biocomplexity

April 25, 2008

After centuries of trying to uncover the fundamental laws of the universe, science is still no closer to answering some of humanity’s biggest questions about the meaning of life, the existence of God and the evolution of the human mind and societies. Is that because science is not sufficiently advanced to tackle such problems? Or is it because the traditional approach to science is incapable of answering humanity’s deepest wonders?

It is the latter, according to University of Calgary physicist, biologist and philosopher Stuart Kauffman, who argues in his forthcoming book that nature’s infinite creativity should become the basis for a new worldview and a global spiritual awakening.

“We are at the point where we are realizing that there are some things we are never going to fully understand because there are no natural laws that can fully explain the evolution of a species, the biosphere or the human economy,” says Kauffman, a pioneer of complexity theory and founder of the U of C’s Institute for Biocomplexity and Informatics. “This means that reason alone is an insufficient guide for living our lives. I believe we can reinvent what we hold sacred as a view of God that is not a supernatural Creator, but the ceaseless and unforeseeable creativity of the universe that surrounds us.”

Kauffman’s newest book Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion (Basic Books, New York) will be released in Canada on May 19. “Radical,” “brilliant,” and “comprehensive,” are words being used by colleagues and reviewers to describe the book, which Kauffman hopes will provide a middle-ground between the destructive tendencies of religious fundamentalism and the anti-spiritual attitudes presented recently in popular books such as Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion “ and journalist Christopher Hitchens’ God Is Not Great.

“Words like ‘God’ and ‘sacred’ are scary to many of us who live in modern, secular society because they have been used to start wars and kill millions of people, and we just don’t need any more of that,” Kauffman says. “What we do need is for humanity to become reunited under a common global ethic based on the idea that we are all part of nature, and we will never be the master of it because it is not entirely knowable.”

Reinventing the Sacred argues that Reductionism – the philosophy based on the work of Galileo, Descartes, Newton and their followers that everything can ultimately be understood by reducing it to laws of chemistry and physics – has been the basis of our scientific worldview for nearly 400 years and is the foundation of modern secular society. Using arguments grounded in complexity theory, he argues that it is time to break this “Galilean spell,” since the reductionist approach is inadequate to explain the infinite possibilities of evolution and human history. Instead, Kauffman argues that the highest levels of organization are the result of the unpredictable process of emergence.

“It’s not that we lack sufficient knowledge or wisdom to predict the future evolution of the biosphere or human culture. It’s that these things are inherently unpredictable because we can never prestate what all the possibilities might be,” he says. “Can a couple walking in love along the banks of the Siene really be reduced to the interactions of fundamental particles? No, they cannot.”

The book then argues that the process of emergence can provide the platform for reinventing what humankind considers most sacred. It also discusses why arguments for intelligent design fail in the scientific realm and how complexity theory can build a bridge between the traditionally opposed views of science and religion.

“God is the most powerful symbol we have and it has always been up to us to choose what we deem to be sacred,” Kauffman said. “To me, the idea that we are the product of 3.8 billion years of unpredictable evolution is more awe-inspiring than the idea than the idea that everything was created in six days by an all-knowing Creator.”

An essay outlining Kauffman’s Reinventing the Sacred thesis is contained in a new series of 13 essays by distinguished thinkers on the topic “Does science make belief in God obsolete?” currently published on the John Templeton Foundation website at: http://templeton.o … .org/belief/. The preface and first chapter of the book are currently published as an essay titled “Breaking the Galilean Spell” on Edge.org at: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman08/kauffman08_index.html" target="_blank">http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman08/kauffman08_index.html">http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kauffman08/kauffman08_index.html

An essay by Kauffman titled “Reinventing the Sacred” is also scheduled to be published in the May 10 issue of New Scientist magazine.

Source: University of Calgary

3.1 /5 (36 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

thales
Apr 25, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
But where will we meet for church? The lab?
moebiex
Apr 25, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
It seems to me that most of the Laws imagined so far are based on a 3-4 dimensional cartesian universe. That they do not satisfactorily explain events that might involve another 7 or so dimensions (String theory)is not really surprising is it. Giving it a name - God or "what is sacred", is only a convenient of labelling what we do not (yet?) understand but that then too often leads to "the Revealed Answer" and imposed denial of further exploration along that line of enquiry. That street runs both ways- supporters of science are in some ways as dogmatic as those of religion but perhaps both are best seen as tools, albeit for different purposes. Just because a tool does not work for one job does not make it useless.
E_L_Earnhardt
Apr 26, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"TRUTH" IS VALUABLE! A closed mind blocks even a question! We now have good data on "Dark Matter". Reputable scientists accept that the first stars were powered by it. Everywhere its effects are mathematicaly described.
superhuman
Apr 27, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Reductionism is THE BEST THING humans ever though of, the holistic approach is only capable of pondering the complexity of things.
Sure reductionism has its limits, but its the best approach we have, you are looking right now at one of its great achievements. Can anyone name a single improvement to our existence that holistic approach has ever come up with?

>Can a couple walking in love along the banks of the Siene really be reduced to the interactions of fundamental particles? No, they cannot.

Of course they can, many people are just too intellectually limited or too scared of the consequences to acknowledge it. They instead prefer the same wishful thinking that gave us heaven. God bless!
itistoday
Apr 28, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
superhuman, you're a smart guy, I normally agree with you, but not on this one. Reductionism has its place, and its accomplishments, as well as its limits.

The concept of disassembling something to find out what makes it tick is an interesting and useful approach that can result in incredible technologies. But there are things that it cannot accomplish, because it's fundamentally incapable of answering certain questions.

Think of a Persian rug, or plain text on a newspaper or computer screen. If you zoom really close to it you'll find all sorts of interesting particles and whatnot, but you will have no idea that it might represent something else. Zoom out and suddenly you discover a pattern, a pattern that has some sort of "significance", a symbolic meaning, that only exists ... when you approach it holistically. The particles of matter have little to do with the abstract thoughts that can emerge from them when arranged in a great, big pattern that constitutes the neural networks in your brain.

Think about it, we known *everything* about the brain at the microscopic level, we can model neural behavior *perfectly* using differential equations, yet we still have no idea how it works! For understanding these sorts of things, a holistic approach is best. And for understanding life too, I suspect. "Daddy, what's the meaning of life?" "Son, it's Maxwell's equations, gravity, the strong force, the weak force, the color force, and a bunch of other things that I don't quite understand."

:-)
superhuman
May 03, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Ha, thanks.
"Daddy, what's the meaning of life?"
"Son, I'd love to know the answer myself! But as far as I was able to determine theres no more meaning to life then to any matter in the universe, just try to make yourself comfortable but be prepared for a rough ride."
:-)
Rank 3.1 /5 (36 votes)
Tags

Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Australian women reject 'I love u' texts

Australian women may have embraced the digital era, but they prefer a face-to-face declaration of affection to an "I love u" text and find men addicted to their mobile phones a major turnoff.

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 3 hours ago | popularity 1 / 5 (1) | comments 1

A frank discussion of the power law and linking correlation to causation

(PhysOrg.com) -- Michael Stumpf a mathematics professor at Imperial College in London, and Mason Porter a lecturer at Oxford have teamed together to write and publish a perspective piece in Science regarding the in ...

Other Sciences / Mathematics

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 11 | with audio podcast report

US workers are 'giving away the store,' costing firms billions

Nearly 70 percent of the nation's service employees give away free goods and services – from hamburgers to cable TV – costing companies billions of dollars a year, according to a groundbreaking study.

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 3 / 5 (5) | comments 11

Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'

A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 3.3 / 5 (3) | comments 10

Storm warning: Financial tsunami heading this way

In today's global village, national coffers are more interconnected than ever before. And as the current economic crisis has proven, a downturn in one country can travel in a wave across the globe, like a financial tsunami. ...

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 3 / 5 (3) | comments 7


New molecule has potential to help treat genetic diseases and HIV

(PhysOrg.com) -- Chemists at The University of Texas at Austin have created a molecule that's so good at tangling itself inside the double helix of a DNA sequence that it can stay there for up to 16 days before ...

Social psychologist: Lust makes you smarter and evidence that seven deadly sins are good for you

(Medical Xpress) -- Good news for lovers on Valentine’s Day - the seven deadly sins, including Lust, are good for you. University of Melbourne social psychologist Dr Simon Laham uses modern research to make a compelling ...

The joy of cheques

An electronic cheque which eliminates the need for costly processing by banks but preserves the simplicity and ease of a traditional cheque book has been designed by a team of academics in the UK.

Research shows promise in converting camelina oil into jet fuel

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at Montana State University-Northern have developed a process to convert camelina oil to jet fuel and other high-value chemicals. MSU has applied for a U.S. patent and research is ongoing.

Researchers make breakthrough in stem cell research

(Medical Xpress) -- University of Queensland scientists have developed a world-first method for producing adult stem cells that will substantially impact patients who have a range of serious diseases.

Georgia Tech develops software for the rapid analysis of foodborne pathogens

2011 brought two of the deadliest bacterial outbreaks the world has seen during the last 25 years. The two epidemics accounted for more than 4,200 cases of infectious disease and 80 deaths. Software developed at Georgia Tech ...