Team hopes to use new technology to search for ETs

June 4, 2008
Team hopes to use new technology to search for ETs

A Johns Hopkins astronomer is a member of a team briefing fellow scientists about plans to use new technology to take advantage of recent, promising ideas on where to search for possible extraterrestrial intelligence in our galaxy.

Richard Conn Henry, a professor in the Henry A. Rowland Department of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins' Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, is joining forces with Seth Shostak of the SETI Institute and Steven Kilston of the Henry Foundation Inc., a Silver Spring, Md., think tank, to search a swath of the sky known as the ecliptic plane. They propose to use new Allen Telescope Array, operated as a partnership between the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., and the Radio Astronomy Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley.

Comprising hundreds of specially produced small dishes that marry modern, miniaturized electronics and innovative technologies with computer processing, the ATA provides researchers with the capability to search for possible signals from technologically advanced civilizations elsewhere in our galaxy – if, in fact, such civilizations exist and are transmitting in this direction.

Employing this new equipment in a unique, targeted search for possible civilizations enhances the chances of finding one, in the same way that a search for a needle in a haystack is made easier if one knows at least approximately where the needle was dropped, said Henry, who is speaking about the proposal at the American Astronomical Society annual meeting in St. Louis.

According to the researchers, the critical place to look is in the ecliptic, a great circle around the sky that represents the plane of Earth's orbit. The sun, as viewed from Earth, appears annually to pass along this circle. Any civilization that lies within a fraction of a degree of the ecliptic could annually detect Earth passing in front of the sun. This ecliptic band comprises only about 3 percent of the sky.

"If those civilizations are out there – and we don't know that they are – those that inhabit star systems that lie close to the plane of the Earth's orbit around the sun will be the most motivated to send communications signals toward Earth," Henry said, "because those civilizations will surely have detected our annual transit across the face of the sun, telling them that Earth lies in a habitable zone, where liquid water is stable. Through spectroscopic analysis of our atmosphere, they will know that Earth likely bears life.

"Knowing where to look tremendously reduces the amount of radio telescope time we will need to conduct the search," he said.

Most of the 100 billion stars in our Milky Way galaxy are located in the galactic plane, forming another great circle around the sky. The two great circles intersect near Taurus and Sagittarius, two constellations opposite each other in the Earth's sky – areas where the search will initially concentrate.

"The crucial implication is that this targeted search in a favored part of the sky -- the ecliptic stripe, if you will – may provide us with significantly better prospects for detecting extraterrestrials than has any previous search effort," Kilston said.

Ray Villard of the Space Telescope Science Institute, who will join the team in its observations, said that in November 2001, STScI publicized Hubble Space Telescope observations of a transiting planet and "it occurred to me that alien civilizations along the ecliptic would likely be doing similar observations to Earth."

"Once they had determined Earth to be habitable, they might initiate sending signals," Villard said.

Shostak of SETI notes that the Allen Telescope Array is ideal for the team's plans to search the entire ecliptic over time, and not just the intersections of the ecliptic and galactic planes.

The team's presentation at the AAS meeting also explores possible scenarios for the appearance of civilizations in our galaxy.

"These models are nothing but pure speculation. But hey … it is educational to explore possibilities," Henry said. "We have no idea how many – if any – other civilizations there are in our galaxy. One critical factor is how long a civilization – for example, our own – remains in existence. If, as we dearly hope, the answer is many millions of years, then even if civilizations are fairly rare, those in our ecliptic plane will have learned of our existence. They will know that life exists on Earth and they will have the patience to beam easily detectable radio (or optical) signals in our direction, if necessary, for millions of years in the hope, now realized, that a technological civilization will appear on Earth."


Source: Johns Hopkins University

4.6 /5 (42 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

1bigschwantz
Jun 04, 2008

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (3)
If nothing else,, they'll do some pretty good astronomy.
zevkirsh
Jun 04, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
how fascinating that we impute our ownnewly formed astronomical capabilities of detecting extrasolar plantets to other foreign civilizations. perhaps they have a far greater power of observation than merely looking for shadow spots on far away starts.....or perhaps they are cavemen....still, the reasoning makes sense, we should impute to them at least as much as we know in order to maximize our chances of finding them.
Mercury_01
Jun 04, 2008

Rank: 3.6 / 5 (5)
I think we need to propigate a lossles virtual scalar potential wave on a bioligical frequency. Any advanced civilization probably has all but abandoned primitive radio waves.
Star_Gazer
Jun 04, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
"... they might initiate sending signals," Villard said..

I think the biggest problem with SETI is the time. If the civilization detected habitable earth, they might have been sending signals for couple of hundreds of years if that, then, the "contact earth" project was canned due to the budget cuts and they stopped broadcasting, and dinosaurs didn't have radio telescope to receive those signals.
thales
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Hm. It says you use the Roman alphabet and apparently wish to communicate. Good enough for me.
thales
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Also, we've pretty much classified all cosmic background signals by this time. A computer program that looks for statistically unlikely noise would be able to pick an alien signal out of the background very quickly.
Alexa
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Here's no advantage in contact with E.T., on contrary.
Bitflux
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 4.4 / 5 (5)
The human race can't even accept the basic differences between our own people. If i was watching earth from afar i wouldnt send any signals, because the first impression would be.. if they see me, they would probably kill me, because im not like them.
CreepyD
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Tbh, I don't think it would matter whether we could communicate or even understand what we picked up.
Just the fact it was detected at all would be enough to have pretty big consequences I think.
Quantum_Conundrum
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Hm. It says you use the Roman alphabet and apparently wish to communicate. Good enough for me.
----
The alphabet is just a consequence of the fact I had nothing else to put up there, I could have just as easily made a bunch of random ascii symbols, but I assure you this message is a coded english sentence with no punctuation or spacing. Basicly you missed my point.

In the case of an alien signal, all you will get is binary, or some other number system used by a computer or transmitter. It will bear no resemblance whatsoever to any spoken or written earth language. If the aliens consider what I am talking about, they will only send a message that is related to mathematics or technology, because common words will not even have an equivalent. They will not have any of the animals we have, so their language will not translate to anything we are familliar with other than math or technology.

It isn't like translating english to spanish. In earth languages it basicly amounts to different words or phrases for the same meaning.

english -> spanish
cat = gato
dog = pero
hello = hola

english -> alien
cat = does not exist
dog = does not exist
hello = ???
equsnarnd
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Quantum Conundrum - I think you're missing the point of looking. We're not trying to have a conversation or order lunch. If we find something out there that is different than random noise or other known background radiation - if it has a hint of intelligence behind it - it allows us to focus on that part of the sky and gives us data to work with. How exciting would that be? Hopefully there won't be a lot of false positives.
Stanley
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Unless we develop technology to jump to other universes in multiverse, we maynot be able to find advanced intelligent. If ET in other universe has the technology, they may find us..or maybe already interacting with some of us?
Mercury_01
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Why would we have to jump to another universe stan? So we can start the search all over again? Do you even know what a mutiverse is, or are you just quoting star trek?
deatopmg
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
more smoke and mirrors and wasted money. Astronomy - good, searching for ET using EM radiation - silly.

What about getting the photos of the moon and mars that have obviously been airbrushed out de-classified and released. Then, if anything intelligently made becomes visible, we can try to contact them directly. Communication time will be seconds to minutes instead 10's of years.
neurogalactus
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Quote:
"They may have already created spintronic computers and transmitters, and would be using different forms of modulation or quantum entanglement to communicate, in which case you couldn't intercept a message anyway. "

Here's the real point of this conversation. There is NO - I repeat: NO WHATSOEVER - indication that other technical civilizations that may be out there use radio waves for communication. It's a completely unjustified assumption, and very self-centric at that. I never really understood why almost every scientist would share this conviction, lending no critical thought to it. OK, let's say that at the dawn of SETI people didn't have enough imagination to even conceive different communication technologies, but today there is no excuse for that. What if those guys from Alpha-Centauri or Epsilon Eridani or wherever they may dwell, use neutrinos for telecom? What if they use quantum entanglement? What if hyperspace tech? What if their comms operate in superluminal modes, of which our science is not aware yet?

Also, suddenly, SETI people suggest that those other civilizations will surely use mass spectroscopy and maybe sth similar to Terrestrial Planet Finder to get info about our world. Wow, how did they figure it out? Why didn't they suggest the same, say, 20 years ago? Because we didn't HAVE that technology, nor BELIEVED it could be feasible then? Could that be the reason? Hmm...

Now, somehow I KNOW that when we develop superluminal communications, we will all of a sudden start assuming that this tech is so damn widely used across all the Universe. What a dramatically innovative thought...

Instead of wasting tons of money for ridiculous EM-based SETI explorations, they'd do a much better choice by focusing on inventing some really useful ways of long-distance communication, to which 30 light years is not an issue.
But then again, we all know such technologies are impossible, don't we?

Stanley
Jun 05, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
If ET lives in different dimension, i.e., different universe in multiverse (multiple universe, plz see wiki for detail), we cannot find them as ant in two dimension cannot find us in 3D. On the other hand, 3D us can find 2D ant easily, wondering whether the ant can figure out how to escape 2D. You may shout "look up"..
thales
Jun 09, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
Quote:
"Instead of wasting tons of money for ridiculous EM-based SETI explorations, they'd do a much better choice by focusing on inventing some really useful ways of long-distance communication, to which 30 light years is not an issue.
But then again, we all know such technologies are impossible, don't we?


This is such a ridiculous point of view, but it seems to turn up periodically. Why don't we look for superluminal or other signals? Because, as pointed out by neurogalactus, we don't HAVE that technology. So we should develop it right? Well, as it turns out, we are unable to develop technology for which there is NO underlying theory. Feel free to invent a neutrino or entanglement communication device yourself, but the rest of us will focus on more practical projects. Also, if we wanted to communicate with a more primitive intelligence -- say, monkeys -- I'm thinking we wouldn't rely on radio transmissions. So why would another intelligence send only signals that require advanced tech? Unless maybe they're not that intelligent. And please don't say that it might not be that advanced to them; entanglement/ neutrinos/hyperluminal anything requires more than basic tech, and certainly is more advanced than modulating light. Right?

And why should we wait to attempt this project until we have such technologies? People want to discover things before they die, and the wait might be a very long time indeed.
PresstoDigitate
Jun 12, 2008

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
We may be being bombarded with ET communication signals right now and just too dim witted to notice. Patterns in the White Noise and television "snow" that we dismiss as 'just nothing' - a null signal. Scalar Waves, Quantum Entanglement, and probably a dozen things we've never thought of, probably DO make more sense than old fashioned RF.

The arrogance of scientists who say "If those civilizations are out there...and we don't know that they are..." is astonishing. Its not a balanced argument as to whethere or not they exist; WE ARE the 'Existence Proof' that biological intelligence DOES exist in the cosmos. There is absolutely no reason to believe that we are alone, and never has been. This is like the old 'scientific' argument over whether or not water could be found elsewhere in the solar system, or whether or not other stars even had planets. Only fools ever doubted either, regardless of their credentials. Now that we have found more water even on tiny Jovian moons than exists on Earth, and planets around most every star we've looked at, perhaps it will give the skeptics pause when they attempt to deny the next incredibly obvious inevitability.
Rank 4.6 /5 (42 votes)
Tags

Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Titan's lack of impact craters
    created7 hours ago
  • Real pictures of black hole eating a star?
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Hypothetical way to travel faster than light, but not technically exceed lightspeed
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • How do scientists monitor the Sun's activity?
    createdFeb 05, 2012
  • Search patterns in observational studies
    createdFeb 05, 2012
  • Derivation of Pogson's law
    createdFeb 03, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

NASA's TRMM satellite sees Cyclone Jasmine in 3-D

Data from NASA's TRMM satellite was used to create a 3-Dimensional look at Cyclone Jasmine, currently moving through the South Pacific Ocean.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Deconstructing a mystery: What caused Snowmaggedon?

In the quiet after the storms, streets and cars had all but disappeared under piles of snow. The U.S. Postal Service suspended service for the first time in 30 years. Snow plows struggled to push the evidence ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 3 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Researchers create 3-D laser maps that show how earthquake changes landscape

Geologists have a new tool to study how earthquakes change the landscape down to a few inches, and it's giving them insight into how earthquake faults behave. In the Feb. 10 issue of the journal Science, a team ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 5 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Ocean microbe communities changing, but long-term environmental impact is unclear

As oceans warm due to climate change, water layers will mix less and affect the microbes and plankton that pump carbon out of the atmosphere – but researchers say it's still unclear whether these processes ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 5 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

NASA sees Tropical Storm 12S - a possible threat to Madagascar

The twelfth tropical depression formed in the Southern Indian Ocean today and quickly became a tropical storm, dubbed Tropical Storm 12S. NASA's Aqua satellite passed over the storm and captured infrared data that revealed ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 3 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Cannabis use doubles chances of vehicle crash

Drivers who consume cannabis within three hours of driving are nearly twice as likely to cause a vehicle collision as those who are not under the influence of drugs or alcohol claims a paper published today in the British ...

Study says children of women exposed to chemotherapy in pregnancy develop as well as other children

A study published Online First by The Lancet Oncology, and linked to The Lancet Series on cancer in pregnancy, shows that children of women exposed to chemotherapy while pregnant develop as well as children in the genera ...

Focus on self-improvement, rather than winning, benefits young athletes

Underserved youth athletes report more life skill and character development when their coaches place greater emphasis on creating caring climates instead of focusing on competition, according to research from ...

Current trend is to preserve pregnancy in patients diagnosed with cervical or ovarian cancer

The first paper in The Lancet Series on cancer in pregnancy explores the issues around gynaecological cancers, with cervical and ovarian being the most common. The current trend is to preserve pregnancy wherever possible. The fi ...

Surgery and chemotherapy are possible for pregnant women with breast cancer

Breast cancer in pregnant women is as common as in non-pregnant women of the same age, with no evidence to suggest pregnancy increases the risk of such cancer. In the majority of cases, pregnant women can have their breast ...

Complications of blood cancers make termination advisable at early stages of pregnancy

Lymphoma is the fourth most common cancer in pregnancy, affecting one in 6000 pregnancies. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute leukaemia, and other blood cancers, while also rare, can also occur in pregnancy. The need for urgent ...