Who shalt not kill? Brain power leads to level-headedness when faced with moral dilemmas

June 9, 2008

Should a sergeant sacrifice a wounded private on the battlefield in order to save the rest of his troops? Is euthanasia acceptable if it prevents needless suffering? Many of us will have to face some sort of extreme moral choice such as these at least once in our life.

And we are also surrounded by less dramatic moral choices everyday: Do I buy the hybrid? Do I vote for a particular presidential candidate? Unfortunately, very little is known beyond philosophical speculation about how people understand morality and make decisions on moral issues.

Past research suggests that moral dilemmas can evoke strong emotions in people and tend to override thoughtful deliberation and reasoning. However, more recent neuroimaging research has discovered that sometimes people are capable of voluntarily suppressing these emotional reactions, allowing for decisions based on reasoning and careful deliberation of the consequences of one's actions.

A new study appearing in the June issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, appears to support this neuroimaging evidence. Adam Moore of Princeton University and his colleagues Brian Clark and Michael Kane of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro tested this notion by measuring individuals' working memory capacity -- essentially their ability to mentally juggle multiple pieces of information. The idea was that people who could best juggle information would be able to control their emotion and engage in "deliberative processing."

The researchers then asked participants to make decisions in emotionally provocative situations. One example:

"A runaway trolley hurtles toward five unaware workmen; the only way to save them is to push a heavy man (standing nearby on a footbridge) onto the track where he will die in stopping the trolley."

In these emotion laden scenarios, people with high working memory capacity were not only more consistent in their judgments but their answers indicated that they were considering the consequences of their choices in a way that the other participants were not.

"This suggests that emotional reactions to moral issues can drive our judgments and motivate action but can also blind us to the consequences of our decisions in some cases," write the authors. Ultimately, people with higher working memory can be relied upon to make more consistent decisions and are able to more deeply consider consequences in these highly charged instances.

Source: Association for Psychological Science


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.1 /5 (15 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • Mercury_01 - Jun 09, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    What if the large guy doesnt fall in front of the trolley, or even worse, doesnt get killed. Theyd have me for murder! Why not just go with the classic "HEY, WATCH OUT!"
  • Sowdi - Jun 09, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    If you have to actually push the guy off of the bridge why not jump yourself? What gives you the right to live in place of the large man?
  • mrlewish - Jun 09, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    That was not an option in the question. Apparently someone here is low functioning. Of course you fat guy gets it. Notice the problem said "the only way".
  • x646d63 - Jun 09, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    There is only one scenario where pushing the fat guy onto the tracks would be acceptable: if he was responsible for the runaway trolley, and his actions were deliberate.

    Murdering someone to save five people from being accidentally killed is unacceptable.

    Murder is a choice, watching five people get killed is unlucky. Choosing to kill is much worse than being unlucky.
  • darrach - Jun 09, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    This is Frances Kamm's 'Principle of Permissible Harm'
    In this case Kamm would say the act was wrong because we commited a wrong act (ie, murdered the heavy man) so it is wrong whatever the ultimate outcome.
    On the other hand, it would have been ok, had we diverted the trolley (and still killed the heavy man) because in this case our original action was intended to do good and therefore correct.

    Reference with Kant and Deontological ethics.
  • slash - Jun 10, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    In his science fiction novel, 'Ring World', Larry Niven presents a very similar problem: do nothing and permit the incredibly huge 'Ringworld' to be destroyed by an imminent catastrophe, or activate a 'mechanism' that would push it out of harm's way, but immediately kill hundreds of millions of people (well, kind of) in the process.

    It's a bit more involved than that, but apart from several orders of magnitude it is so similar to the above example I thought I should mention it.
  • Sowdi - Jun 14, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    That was not an option in the question. Apparently someone here is low functioning. Of course you fat guy gets it. Notice the problem said "the only way".


    Well okay but I still couldn't kill a person to save others. It goes against my morals, even considering that not helping the five men when given the ability to do so could in itself make me their killers in a way. I rather would be blamed for not saving them than kill a man directly.

June 9, 2008 all stories

Comments: 7

4.1 /5 (15 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Professor: Fear, Shame Keep Homeowners From Defaulting
    created Nov 05, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Medical ethics experts identify, address key issues in H1N1 pandemic
    created Sep 23, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Why Saints Sin and Sinners Get Saintly
    created Jun 26, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Disclosure of organ transplant risks: A question of when, not if
    created Jun 26, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Parents just don't understand
    created Nov 05, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Swine flu vaccination
    created 1hour ago
  • Improving the brain through chemistry
    created Nov 07, 2009
  • Sleep / REM Sleep and homeostasis
    created Nov 07, 2009
  • The Biceps Reflex
    created Nov 05, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

Other News

The upside of feeling down

The upside of feeling down

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 9 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (4) | comments 4

A chill wind chases you into the door of your local newsagent. Rain is drumming down outside. As you pay for your newspaper, you briefly notice a number of strange items on the checkout counter - a matchbox ...


Words, gestures are translated by same brain regions, says new research

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 14 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0

Your ability to make sense of Groucho's words and Harpo's pantomimes in an old Marx Brothers movie takes place in the same regions of your brain, says new research funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication ...


Implantable Glucose Sensor Could Spell Relief for Millions of Diabetics (w/ Video)

Implantable Glucose Sensor Could Spell Relief for Millions of Diabetics (w/ Video)

Medicine & Health / Research

created 10 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- UConn researchers have developed a tiny wireless device that can be inserted under a patient?s skin to monitor blood glucose levels over a period of several months.


Diet switching can activate brain's stress system, lead to 'withdrawal' symptoms

Medicine & Health / Research

created 11 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

In research that sheds light on the perils of yo-yo dieting and repeated bouts of sugar-bingeing, researchers from The Scripps Research Institute have shown in animal models that cycling between periods of eating sweet and ...


Deepening the search  for clues to rheumatoid arthritis

Deepening the search for clues to rheumatoid arthritis

Medicine & Health / Genetics

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 7

(PhysOrg.com) -- The gnawing pain of rheumatoid arthritis is a signal that the body’s immune system has hit the wrong target: its own cartilage and bone.