Ocean temperatures and sea level increases 50 percent higher than previously estimated
June 18, 2008
New research suggests that ocean temperature and associated sea level increases between 1961 and 2003 were 50 percent larger than estimated in the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.
The results are reported in the June 19 edition of the journal Nature. An international team of researchers, including Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory climate scientist Peter Gleckler, compared climate models with improved observations that show sea levels rose by 1.5 millimeters per year in the period from 1961-2003. That equates to an approximately 2½-inch increase in ocean levels in a 42-year span.
The ocean warming and thermal expansion rates are more than 50 percent larger than previous estimates for the upper 300 meters of oceans.
The research corrected for small but systematic biases recently discovered in the global ocean observing system, and uses statistical techniques that “infill” information in data-sparse regions. The results increase scientists’ confidence in ocean observations and further demonstrate that climate models simulate ocean temperature variability more realistically than previously thought.
“This is important for the climate modeling community because it demonstrates that the climate models used for assessing sea-level rise and ocean warming tie in closely with the observed results,” Gleckler said.
Climate model data were analyzed from 13 different modeling groups. All model data were obtained from the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset archived at the LLNL’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI).

Estimates of ocean heat content and sea surface temperature. Upper: Comparison of our upper-ocean heat content with previous estimates (red1 and blue12) for the upper 700 m. The straight lines are linear fits to the estimates. The global mean stratospheric optical depth(arbitrary scale) at the bottom indicates the timing of major volcanic eruptions. The brown curve is a three-year running average of these values, included for comparison with the smoothed observations. Lower: Comparison of thick black line, as in a with the thick red line; thin red lines indicate estimates of one standard deviation error) results with sea surface temperature (blue; right-hand scale). All time series were smoothed with a three-year running average and are relative to 1961.
Although observations and models confirm that recent warming is greatest in the upper ocean, there are widespread observations of warming deeper than 700 meters.
Results were compared with recent estimates of other contributions to sea-level rise including glaciers, ice caps, Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, and thermal expansion changes in the deep ocean. When these independent lines of evidence are examined collectively, the story is more consistent than found in earlier studies.
The oceans store more than 90 percent of the heat in the Earth’s climate system and act as a temporary buffer against the effects of climate change. The ocean warming and thermal expansion rates are 50 percent larger than previous estimates for the upper 700 meters of oceans, and greater than that for the upper 300 meters.
“This is just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak,” Gleckler said. “Our ability to quantify structural uncertainties in observationally based estimates is critically important. This study represents important progress.”
The team involved researchers from the Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research (CSIRO), the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre and LLNL.
Source: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
-
Ocean warming causes elephant seals to dive deeper
41 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
-
Heat and cold damage corals in their own ways, study shows
Feb 02, 2012 |
not rated yet |
0
-
New study shows correlation between summer Arctic sea ice cover and winter weather in Central Europe
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
0
-
Tropical cyclones to cause greater damage
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (4) |
1
-
Global experts question claims about jellyfish populations
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (2) |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
16 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
19 hours ago
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
7
|
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
3
|
Clam fields found at deep, low-temperature Mariana vents
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have marveled at the unusual life forms thriving at high temperature hydrothermal vents of the deep ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
5 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Two new moons for Jupiter
Advances in technology have lead to the discovery of new planets outside of our Solar System, and now even new moons in our own backyard.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
2
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
India probes Google over 'forex transactions'
Indian authorities are probing whether online giant Google broke domestic foreign-exchange transactions rules while shifting funds abroad, the Press Trust of India reported on Friday.
Germany freezes signing of disputed Internet pact
Germany on Friday halted the signing of a controversial international accord billed as a way to beat online piracy that has sparked angry protests, saying it needed more time to consider it.
Health experts, scientists to discuss bird flu studies
The World Health Organization said Friday it will meet next week to determine whether scientists can publish research on a bird flu virus that may be easily passed among humans.
Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'
A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...
Obama forges compromise birth control plan
US President Barack Obama Friday announced a compromise to defuse a row over access to birth control which prompted election-year Republican critics to claim he was waging a war on religion.
Jun 18, 2008
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (13)
1) Obviously the models are wrong, since they got it wrong by 50%. Therefore predictions of GW are worthless. Since the predictions are worthless, there isn't any GW. Therefore this report is wrong.
2) There isn't any GW, since the polar bear population has doubled since we almost killed them off.
3) This is all a conspiracy by the liberal fascist dictatorial libertarian communist treehugging homosexual baby-eating tree-huggers, probably the same people who faked the moon landing.
4) It's TYRANNY, I tell you TYRANNY!!!
Let the games begin.
Jun 18, 2008
Rank: 3 / 5 (12)
Jun 18, 2008
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (7)
Jun 18, 2008
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (9)
http://sealevel.c...obal.jpg
Ignore the black line mean to hide the fact the blue line is going down.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (5)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Let me put you straight. No one denies that the world (until recently) has been warming. If the world is warming then, of course, the upper oceans will temporarily store that heat.
What is not scientifically proven is whether or not the warming has been the (primary) result of the green-house effect caused by anthropogenic CO2.
In fact, the recent leveling off or cooling of the top 700 m of the world's oceans is NOT predicted by GW models.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (8)
It has also not been *proven* that cigarettes cause cancer, that evolution actually happens, that Relativity is a reality, or any other number of silly comparisons I could come up with. The denialist stance is basically binary: either something is completely 100% proven, or it is a flip of a coin. The denialists feel that all they have to do is get the slightest bit of doubt in there, and suddenly it's anyone's game.
The reality is, GW isn't 100% proven, but it is (perhaps) 95% likely. I'm just tossing that number out as an example, so don't get bent out of shape about the specifics. The point is that it *isn't* 50%, and it *isn't* anywhere near 50%. Like the creationist, you think that if you keep chipping away at the edges of things, you can "win by default".
But all the decisive arguments from denialists (as opposed to the name calling, which is no doubt fun but really irrelevant) always turn out to be BS.
Now, when I'm sitting on the sidelines watching two groups argue about something, I listen as much to what is *not* said, and *how* things are said, as I do to the arguments themselves. If one side relies mostly on personal attacks, they're probably wrong. If one side relies on arguments that are out and out manufactured, they're probably wrong. If one side plays fast and loose with stats in a way that couldn't possibly have been done accidentally, they're probably wrong. Or at least, it's reasonable to conclude that their stance is *not* based on the facts, but on some other hidden motivation. This describes the denialist stance perfectly, to a T. It also describes the creationist stance, the tobacco company stance, and any number of other situations that I just can't be bothered to list.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
so using your logic if we ended cigarettes there would be no cancer (note you did not say lung cancer or emphysema so can I make your over reaching statement to mean all cancer?
The logical progression would be that it we all became Luddites and went back to the earth like noble savages there would be no change in the temp of the earth ever.. does the term interglacial period mean anything to you ?
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
This following is in no way meant to say anything about global warming, but to point out how easily we are manipulated.
Bush was originally against GW in order to get the environmentalists all fired up to get data for it, and they did. Then, he turncoats and is suddenly for it? The man who still insists Iraq had WMDs and there are little brown men trying to kill us... Someone as bullheaded as him does not change stance like that. The only reasonable explanation is that he was for it from the get-go and used the environmentalists to make his argument for him, knowing they would disagree with his standpoint. If he came out originally and said 'The planet is warming. We need carbon taxes!' we would all be screaming conspiracy now.
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Your analogies are flawed, as evolution and the cigarette/cancer links are derived from observable and meaningful data. The current global warming projections, on the contrary, are based on computer models of an incredibly complex system using date from a sample so infinitesimally small as to be utterly meaningless (less than 200 years of climate data). Even the most empirically sound statement made by global warming adherents, that global temperatures have trended upward since 1850 has been challenged by a recent study of temperature monitoring sites.
Even IF global warming is happening as quickly AND for the reasons cited, the trillions of dollars we will spend in knee-jerk reactions (such as corn ethanol subsidies) could be employed to save millions of lives by addressing current, measureable problems with available solutions, such as disease and diet deficiencies.