Toolbox
  • User rankingRating: 4.4
  • Add to favoritesBookmark
  • Save as PDFSave as PDF
  • PrintPrint
  • EmailEmail
  • Blog ItBlog It
  • Stumble ItStumble It!
Digg It Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Save to Windows live Share on facebook Save to MySpace Slashdot it science news feed Add to google
- size +

Greenland ice core analysis shows drastic climate change near end of last ice age

Caption: The North Greenland Ice Core Project camp. Credit: NGRIP
Caption: The North Greenland Ice Core Project camp. Credit: NGRIP

Temperatures spiked 22 degrees F in just 50 years, researchers say
Information gleaned from a Greenland ice core by an international science team shows that two huge Northern Hemisphere temperature spikes prior to the close of the last ice age some 11,500 years ago were tied to fundamental shifts in atmospheric circulation.
The ice core showed the Northern Hemisphere briefly emerged from the last ice age some 14,700 years ago with a 22-degree-Fahrenheit spike in just 50 years, then plunged back into icy conditions before abruptly warming again about 11,700 years ago. Startlingly, the Greenland ice core evidence showed that a massive "reorganization" of atmospheric circulation in the Northern Hemisphere coincided with each temperature spurt, with each reorganization taking just one or two years, said the study authors.

The new findings are expected to help scientists improve existing computer models for predicting future climate change as increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere drive up Earth's temperatures globally.

The team used changes in dust levels and stable water isotopes in the annual ice layers of the two-mile-long Greenland ice core, which was hauled from the massive ice sheet between 1998 to 2004, to chart past temperature and precipitation swings. Their paper was published in the June 19 issue of Science Express, the online version of Science.

The ice cores -- analyzed with powerful microscopes -- were drilled as part of the North Greenland Ice Core Project led by project leader Dorthe Dahl-Jensen of the Centre for Ice and Climate at the Neils Bohr Institute of the University of Copenhagen. The study included 17 co-investigators from Europe, one from Japan and two from the United States -- Jim White and Trevor Popp from the University of Colorado at Boulder.

"We have analyzed the transition from the last glacial period until our present warm interglacial period, and the climate shifts are happening suddenly, as if someone had pushed a button," said Dahl-Jenson.

According to the researchers, the first abrupt warming period beginning at 14,700 years ago lasted until about 12,900 years ago, when deep-freeze conditions returned for about 1,200 years before the onset of the second sharp warming event. The two events indicate a speed in the natural climate change process never before seen in ice cores, said White, director of CU-Boulder's Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research.

"We are beginning to tease apart the sequence of abrupt climate change," said White, whose work was funded by the National Science Foundation's Office of Polar Programs. "Since such rapid climate change would challenge even the most modern societies to successfully adapt, knowing how these massive events start and evolve is one of the most pressing climate questions we need to answer."

Both dramatic warming events were preceded by decreasing Greenland dust deposition, indicating higher tropical temperatures and significantly more rain falling on the deserts of Asia at the time, said White. The team believes the ancient tropical warming caused large, rapid atmospheric changes at the equator, the intensification of the Pacific monsoon, sea-ice loss in the north Atlantic Ocean and more atmospheric heat and moisture over Greenland and much of the rest of the Northern Hemisphere.

"Here we propose a series of events beginning in the lower latitudes and leading to changes in the ocean and atmosphere that reveal for the first time the anatomy of abrupt climate change," the authors wrote. White likened the abrupt shift in the Northern Hemisphere circulation pattern to shifts in the North American jet stream as it steers storms around the continent.

"We know such events are in Earth's future, but we don't know when," said White. "One question is whether we can see the symptoms before big problems occur. Until we answer these questions, we are speeding blindly down a narrow road, hoping there are no curves ahead."

Each yearly record of ice can reveal past temperatures and precipitation levels, the content of ancient atmospheres and even evidence for the timing and magnitude of distant storms, fires and volcanic eruptions, said White. The cores from the site -- located roughly in the middle of Greenland at an elevation of about 9,850 feet -- are four-inch-diameter cylinders brought to the surface in 11.5-foot lengths, said White.

Source: University of Colorado at Boulder
» Next Article in Space & Earth science - Earth Sciences: Space radar to improve miners' safety

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4.4 out of 5 after 48 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by gmurphy 06/19/08 18:23
Rank: 3.8/5 after 10 votes
Our climate models are broadly correct, the ice sheets are melting, the jet streams are restructuring, precipitation is increasing. This isn't propaganda, this is fact, if you disagree with this, please post your evidence to the contrary here, and I mean evidence, not troll spew.
Posted by Glis 06/19/08 18:46
Rank: 3.7/5 after 3 votes
I don't know of anyone that doesn't agree with this. The argument is on the cause and if it's going to be bad or good for the next few centuries.
Posted by DGBEACH 06/19/08 19:30
Rank: 3.5/5 after 8 votes
The main difference between then and now is us.

I can see why some people might be screaming fowl these days when presented by geological histories like this, but our contribution cannot be ignored.
Posted by mysticfree 06/19/08 20:00
Rank: 3.6/5 after 10 votes
"Our contribution" can't be blown out of proportion either.
Posted by k_m 06/19/08 20:32
Rank: 4/5 after 13 votes
What were they driving in Greenland that caused the warming back then?
Posted by bobwinners 06/20/08 01:09
Rank: 3.4/5 after 7 votes
I think the pertinent fact in this report is that sudden and dramatic temperature change can occur. Hopefully, further study will 'tease' out the riddle of why.
We cannot compare today with 14,000 years ago, since we don't know what caused the rapid changes back then.
We do know that change is happening now. It is pretty evident that we are responsible to some extent. Given that, it seem to me in our best interests to reduce our influence to a minimum.
Personally, I like it cold!
Hopefully, change will occur at a rate which humanity can keep up with.
Posted by RAL 06/20/08 05:46
Rank: 3.4/5 after 9 votes
If anything, this demonstrates that far more dramatic swings in temperature can and do occur in the complete absence of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. And that in spite of such extreme swings of climate the animals appear to have survived quite well as well as humans. Which should underscore the bombastic overstatement of panic about present conditions.
Posted by DGBEACH 06/20/08 08:11
Rank: 3.7/5 after 6 votes
RAL...you obviously don't live somewhere that is either about to be covered by water, or that is about to run out of it. 14000 years ago homosapiens didn't number over 7 billion, nor were they driving cars.
Soon MILLIONS of people will be displaced by the changes on this planet,ergo the normal panic reactions.

Posted by KB6 06/20/08 09:40
Rank: 3.4/5 after 5 votes
The less you demand of a planet the more leeway you have for survival when the planet changes. 14000 years ago we demanded very little. Now we demand vastly more.
Posted by D666 06/20/08 10:43
Rank: 2.7/5 after 7 votes

Soon MILLIONS of people will be displaced by the changes on this planet,ergo the normal panic reactions.


Yes, but it's millions of OTHER people. This is the point that people like you keep missing. As long as it's SOMEONE ELSE who's going to suffer, it's ok.

That's also the rationale behind the denialist apologia that "GW can have upsides too". Yes, most of the population of (third world country) may drown or starve, but I COULD END UP WITH WATERFRONT PROPERTY!! WHOO-HOOO!

Posted by jet 06/20/08 12:09
Rank: 3.5/5 after 6 votes
so, when data shows that the earth, has rapid swings in temp, form ice core data it proves what ?

1 That the earth as climate changes

2 That we learned more and now understand that climate changes have and therefore will occur from time to time

3 That even though it has happened before and will happen again, that a trace gas that only marginally affectes the cliamate in comparison to other factors will cause catastrophic change and kill millions, if not destroy the world in total.


Which one seem the least like science and most like agenda driven politics...

Posted by wfl 06/20/08 14:15
Rank: 5/5 after 4 votes
There is little correlation between events at the end of the last ice are 14,000 years ago and the present. Certainly no evidence of cause/ effect between then and now.

I suggest that the researchers go back to their ice cores and study the conditions that immendaitely preceeded the last ice age. This could lead to important discoveries that are necessary to understand what is necessary for adaptation.
Posted by snwboardn 06/20/08 14:55
Rank: 2.8/5 after 4 votes
Well I for one am finally glad that real science is starting to disprove these myths about how we are the reason behind global warming. Now my question is, what is the (main) reason behind this warming? My first guess would be the sun. Does any body know how long we have kept "accurate" records of the sun and its energy output? What about ocean currents? Is there any way to tell what the ocean was doing during the last warm up and ice age?
Posted by Ninderthana 06/20/08 21:20
Rank: 2.8/5 after 4 votes
Over the last 3 million years, the Earth's climate system has flipped between two modes,ice ages (~ 6 C cooler than today), lasting about 40,000 - 100,000, and shorter interglacials, lasting ~ 5 - 15,000 years.

We are currently ~ 10 - 14,000 years into a (short) interglacial. Only one of the last four or five interglacials has lasted longer than the current one.

Using this temperature record as a predictive tool, my money would be on the Earth's mean temperature cooling by ~ 6 C over a very short period of time, sometime in the next 3000 years. A cooling of this magnitude would lead to a significant expansion of the world's desert regions and most likley desimate the Earth's human population.

And the irony of all this is that human's can do bugger all to change this outcome.
Posted by hibiscus 06/23/08 09:02
Rank: 5/5 after 2 votes
80% of the earth's surface is water.. right? When we finally reach the end of this current ice age it will be 100% again, which I strongly feel is our creators intention anyway:

"and I destroyed the idiots that lived on the land, but I will never do it again, promise... really.. hand on my heart, I swear it on my son's cross... I promise... :-)"

Idiots 7:276