Gallons per mile would help car shoppers make better decisions
June 19, 2008Posting a vehicle's fuel efficiency in "gallons per mile" rather than "miles per gallon" would help consumers make better decisions about car purchases and environmental impact, researchers from Duke University's Fuqua School of Business report in the June 20 issue of Science magazine.
Inspired by debates they had while carpooling in a hybrid car, management professors Richard Larrick and Jack Soll ran a series of experiments showing that the current standard, miles per gallon or mpg, leads consumers to believe that fuel consumption is reduced at an even rate as efficiency improves. People presented with a series of car choices in which fuel efficiency was defined in miles per gallon were not able to easily identify the choice that would result in the greatest gains in fuel efficiency.
For example, most people ranked an improvement from 34 to 50 mpg as saving more gas over 10,000 miles than an improvement from 18 to 28 mpg, even though the latter saves twice as much gas. (Going from 34 to 50 mpg saves 94 gallons; but from 18 to 28 mpg saves 198 gallons).
These mistaken impressions were corrected, however, when participants were presented with fuel efficiency expressed in gallons used per 100 miles rather than mpg. Viewed this way, 18 mpg becomes 5.5 gallons per 100 miles, and 28 mpg is 3.6 gallons per 100 miles -- an $8 difference today.
"The reality that few people appreciate is that improving fuel efficiency from 10 to 20 mpg is actually a more significant savings than improving from 25 to 50 mpg for the same distance of driving," Larrick said. (See table below.)
Soll noted that replacing a large vehicle that gets 10 mpg with one that gets 20 mpg reduces gas use per 100 miles from 10 gallons to five, a 5-gallon savings. Replacing a small vehicle that gets 25 mpg with one that gets 50 mpg reduces gas use per 100 miles from 4 gallons to 2, a saving of only 2 gallons.
"Miles per gallon is misleading and can play tricks on our intuitions," Soll said.
"For families and other owners of more than one type of vehicle, the greatest fuel savings often comes from improving the efficiency of the less efficient car," Soll added. "When fuel efficiency is expressed as gallons per 100 miles, it becomes clear which combination of cars will save a family the most gas.
"We believe that everyone should try to be as fuel efficient as possible. For some people, that may mean driving the most efficient car available, such as a small hybrid car, but for others it may mean finding the most efficient option possible within their chosen class of car," Soll said. "There are significant savings to be had by improving efficiency by even two or three miles per gallon on inefficient cars, but because we communicate in miles per gallon, that savings is not immediately evident to consumers."
The authors recommend that consumer publications and car manufacturers list efficiency in terms of gallons per 10,000 miles driven, which is already the standard in many other countries. "This measure makes it easy to see how much gas one might use in a given year of driving and how much gas, and money, can be saved by opting for a car with greater efficiency," Larrick said.
Source: Duke University
-
The case of the missing gas mileage
Jan 04, 2012 |
4.1 / 5 (22) |
63
-
Low emission cars under NREL's microscope
Aug 18, 2011 |
2 / 5 (1) |
5
-
Students design cars the get 1000 MPG+
Jun 27, 2011 |
4.8 / 5 (8) |
17
-
Guzzlers B Gone: New fuel economy labels for cars
May 30, 2011 |
5 / 5 (2) |
9
-
2,564 miles per gallon achieved at Shell Eco-marathon
Apr 19, 2011 |
4 / 5 (2) |
2
-
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (33) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (5) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Bohr-Einstein debate: why did Bohr not simply say...
Feb 06, 2012
-
Best/Worst U.S. Presidents
Jan 31, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - History & Humanities
More news stories
Myths and shame keep many from seeking bankruptcy protection
(PhysOrg.com) -- Two interesting facts that may counter modern ideas about bankruptcy: The overwhelming majority of U.S. filings belong to individuals rather than corporations or entities, and most of these ...
Other Sciences / Economics & Business
10 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
7
What we mean when we ask for the milk
New research into the different ways that English and Polish people use language in everyday family situations can help members of each community to understand each other better and avoid cultural misunderstandings.
Other Sciences / Social Sciences
8 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
3
A lost world? How zooarchaeology can inform biodiversity conservation
A new study of tropical forests will provide a 50,000-year perspective on how animal biodiversity has changed, explored through an archaeological investigation of animal bones.
Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
10 hours ago |
3 / 5 (2) |
0
Putting the magic into maths
Queen Mary, University of London has developed a new educational resource for teachers to help students use amazing magic tricks to learn about maths.
11 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Australian women reject 'I love u' texts
Australian women may have embraced the digital era, but they prefer a face-to-face declaration of affection to an "I love u" text and find men addicted to their mobile phones a major turnoff.
Other Sciences / Social Sciences
15 hours ago |
3 / 5 (2) |
2
First-of-its-kind stem cell study re-grows healthy heart muscle in heart attack patients
Results from a Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute clinical trial show that treating heart attack patients with an infusion of their own heart-derived cells helps damaged hearts re-grow healthy muscle.
Scientists discover reason for Mt. Hood's non-explosive nature
(PhysOrg.com) -- For a half-million years, Mount Hood has towered over the landscape, but unlike some of its cousins in Oregons Cascade Mountains and many other volcanoes around the Pacific Rim ...
Discovery paves way for salmonella vaccine
(Medical Xpress) -- An international research team led by a University of California, Davis, immunologist has taken an important step toward an effective vaccine against salmonella, a group of increasingly antibiotic-resistant ...
Time of year important in projections of climate change effects on ecosystems
(PhysOrg.com) -- Does it matter whether long periods of hot weather, such as last year's heat wave that gripped the U.S. Midwest, happen in June or July, August or September?
Smoking bans lead to less, not more, smoking at home: study
Smoking bans in public/workplaces don't drive smokers to light up more at home, suggests a study of four European countries with smoke free legislation, published online in Tobacco Control.
Ovarian cancer arises in fallopian tube of knockout mice
(Medical Xpress) -- The most deadly form of "ovarian" cancer arises in the fallopian tubes not the ovaries of knockout mice that lack two genes associated with the disease, said researchers led by Baylor College ...
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
Your average scooter or moped.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
No, they're talking about absolute cost like it's better than relative savings.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The current system is ideal for being poor. If it's 25mpg and I can afford 2 gallons of gas, I know how far I'll get without a calculator, which I don't have because I sold it for gas.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://www.aptera.com/
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
Also, it is true as mentioned - there's no way your gonna get 'mericans to figure out that less is more when they are so used to more being more.
Jun 19, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 20, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
Then it will be Amps-per-mile (kilometer)I should imagine...or better, miles-per-charge. 'Seems LESS confusing.
Jun 21, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 21, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
This whole study is ridiculous waste of my money.
anyway, we all (should) know that there is reduced return as we get closer to (asymptote) the limit. So the %change to 54 mpg is less but it is nearly 100% better than 28 mpg.
Jun 23, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
One question is what denominator is best. 1 mile? 100 miles? My personal preference would be gallons per 1000 miles. This roughly approximates gallons used per month, which puts it in the same terms as other bills and notably car payments. Then most car purchasers could more easily put a value on reduced fuel consumption.
For example, is it worth $120/month extra to get a 50 mpg Prius instead of a 34 mpg Corolla? Most people would need a calculator to figure this out. However if you're told the Prius uses 20 gallons per month and the Corolla uses 29, well, that's only a 9 gallon/month savings. Maybe you like the Prius for it's styling, but the lower fuel costs sure don't justify the higher price.
Using the right units makes everything so much clearer.
Jun 23, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
Americans have one case of "less is more" down pretty well. We understand that lower costs are better. Just refer to gallons per mile as "fuel costs" instead of "fuel efficiency". Then less is more.
Jun 23, 2008
Rank: not rated yet
> as 18 to 28 mpg but at 34 mpg the owner
> is already way ahead of the fool switching
> to the 28 mpg car.
This isn't about awarding medals to those who are "way ahead"; it's about recognizing the best opportunities for saving fuel. If you currently use only a tiny amount of fuel, by definition you cannot reduce your usage by more than a tiny amount of fuel. However someone who uses a lot of fuel has the potential to reduce their usage by a much greater amount than you can (even if after doing so they still use more than you). That's the opportunity.
Using gallons per mile instead of miles per gallon makes it more clear where the opportunities are for reducing fuel consumption.
> So the %change to 54 mpg is less but it is
> nearly 100% better than 28 mpg
Really? 54 mpg uses nearly 50% less fuel than 28 mpg. I'd call that "nearly 50% better", not "nearly 100% better".
Jun 23, 2008
Rank: not rated yet