Toolbox
  • User rankingRating: 4.6
  • Add to favoritesBookmark
  • Save as PDFSave as PDF
  • PrintPrint
  • EmailEmail
  • Blog ItBlog It
  • Stumble ItStumble It!
Digg It Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Save to Windows live Share on facebook Save to MySpace Slashdot it science news feed Add to google
- size +

Not a Quirk But a Quark ... a Quark Star!

Illustration of a supernova explosion. Three exceptionally luminous supernovae explosions have been observed in recent years. One was first observed using a robotic telescope at Caltechs Palomar Observatory. Data collected with Palomars Samuel Oschin ...
Illustration of a supernova explosion. Three exceptionally luminous supernovae explosions have been observed in recent years. One was first observed using a robotic telescope at Caltech's Palomar Observatory. Data collected with Palomar's Samuel Oschin Telescope was transmitted from the remote mountain site in southern California to astronomers via the NSF-funded High-Performance Wireless Research and Education Network (HPWREN). The Nearby Supernova Factory research group at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory reported the co-discovery of the supernova, known as SN2005gj. Researchers in Canada have analyzed this, along with two other supernovae, and believe that they each may be the signature of the explosive conversion of a neutron star into a quark star. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss
Astronomers recently announced that they have found a novel explanation for a rare type of super-luminous stellar explosion that may have produced a new type of object known as a quark star.
Three exceptionally luminous supernovae explosions have been observed in recent years. One of them was first observed using a robotic telescope at the California Institute of Technology's (Caltech) Palomar Observatory.

Data collected with Palomar's Samuel Oschin Telescope was transmitted from the remote mountain site in southern California to astronomers via the High-Performance Wireless Research and Education Network (HPWREN), funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The Nearby Supernova Factory research group at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory reported the co-discovery of the supernova, known as SN2005gj.

Researchers in Canada have analyzed this, along with two other supernovae, and believe that they each may be the signature of the explosive conversion of a neutron star into a quark star.

These three supernovae, each 100 times brighter than a typical supernova, have been difficult to explain. The Canadian reserach team thinks the explosions herald the creation of a previously unobserved and new class of objects designated as quark stars.

A quark star is a hypothetical type of star composed of ultra dense quark matter. Quarks are the fundamental components of protons and neutrons, which make up the nucleus of atoms. The most dense objects known to exist today are neutron stars--stars composed entirely of tightly packed neutrons. A typical neutron star is some 16 miles across, yet has a mass one and a half times the mass of our Sun.

Neutron stars are formed when a massive star undergoes a supernova explosion at the end of its life. The question is, is a neutron star indeed the most dense object that exists? It is thought that if the neutrons are too tightly packed--if what scientists consider a neutron star is too dense--the resulting instability may lead to a further collapse, resulting in a second explosion and the creation of a quark star. The energy that powers that second explosiion comes from neutrons breaking down into their component parts: quarks.

Further observations should help to confirm or defeat the hypothesis of quark stars, but in either case, the use of a high-speed network like HPWREN helps astronomers across the world explore the frontiers of science.

Source: The National Science Foundation
» Next Article in Space & Earth science - Astronomy: Cluster listens to the sounds of Earth

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4.6 out of 5 after 41 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by thales 06/27/08 19:21
Not rated yet.
I guess it could be a quark star, but it sounds strange.
Posted by GoodElf 06/27/08 20:32
Rank: 1.3/5 after 7 votes
Sounds implausible. Free quarks do not exist. The statement "These three supernovae, each 100 times brighter than a typical supernova, have been difficult to explain"... sounds they have proposed something even harder still to explain.

Other than a "yummy new type of bomb", I can't see the motivation for this purely speculative physics. They are breaking much more than the laws of physics here, they may also be breaking the laws of morality as well. It will get funding for no other reason than it's hard to say "no" to even more powerful "explosives" than fusion devices. They are "pressing all the right buttons"... Unfortunately.

IMHO they should look for answers in other more plausible arenas.
Posted by belwood 06/27/08 22:18
Rank: 3/5 after 2 votes
The original article isn't about Quark Stars per se - that model has been around for several years. The article is more about the model of a Quark-Nove instead.
Posted by axemaster 06/28/08 01:44
Rank: 4.2/5 after 5 votes
"Free quarks do not exist."

True, but that's not what they're talking about. And I can see no reference to bombs here either. Keep your hat on please.

-Axemaster
Posted by Ragtime 06/28/08 10:10
Rank: 1/5 after 2 votes
Why not to consider neutrino stars, for example? The quark star demonstrates, the transition to black hole model is rather gradual inside of our universe. By my opinion, most of black holes are formed rather by sort of very dense stars, instead of true singularities.

Here are some theories, the increased frequency of quark and strange matter stars would signalize the upcoming phase transition of vacuum into a new generation of Universe.
Posted by thales 06/30/08 12:45
Not rated yet.
I don't think anyone got my punny little joke - another name for a quark star is a strange star. :)
Posted by Basil 07/01/08 06:04
Not rated yet.
"free quarks do not exist"

well.. quarks would still be confined within the star.