Surprising fact: Half of gun deaths are suicides

July 1st, 2008 By MIKE STOBBE , AP Medical Writer Surprising fact: Half of gun deaths are suicides (AP)

Semi-automatic handguns and revolvers are seen on top of a glass display case at John Jovino Co. on Thursday, June 26, 2008 in New York. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled earlier in the day that Americans have a constitutional right to keep guns in their homes for self-defense - the justices' first major pronouncement on gun control in U.S. history. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

(AP) -- The Supreme Court's landmark ruling on gun ownership last week focused on citizens' ability to defend themselves from intruders in their homes. But research shows that surprisingly often, gun owners use the weapons on themselves.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


Gun shows do not increase homicides or suicides

created Oct 01, 2008 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 1

Firearms industry should bear financial liability for homicides involving handguns

created Mar 18, 2008 | popularity 2.5 / 5 (19) | comments 9

Guns in homes strongly associated with higher rates of suicide

created Apr 10, 2007 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 0

NYPD looking at futuristic weapons technology

created Jun 06, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 5

First study of gun shows California laws reduce illegal gun purchases

created Jun 12, 2007 | popularity 2.1 / 5 (20) | comments 0


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Digg this Stumble it share on Facebook share on Reddit add to delicious save to Yahoo! bookmarks
4.3/5 after 9 votes

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • madrocketscientist - Jul 01, 2008
    • Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
    "Public-health researchers have concluded that in homes where guns are present, the likelihood that someone in the home will die from suicide or homicide is much greater."

    Which public health studies are you referencing? You mention that the Kleck study has critics who think the numbers are an over-estimation, but fail to mention the criticisms of the other studies by Health Agencies. Of course, this is an AP piece, so their bias shows.

    As with most issues of violence, money and efforts would be better spent in tackling the underlying issues of suicide and domestic battery than just hoping that taking the gun away will reduce the problem.
  • ricarguy - Jul 02, 2008
    • Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
    Let's see, with Kleck's so called "over-estimated" study, that's a 30:1 ratio. I'm surprised the numbers are that good, yet they publish a story about a 3% down side? Correction, that's about a 1.5% down side for suicide probability. So what's the point of the story?

    Also I am curious about Justice Breyer's quote in his dissenting opinion. Shouldn't he be concerned with constitutional law and the intent of the people who wrote and enacted the amendment? It seems as though he is just fishing for reasons to oppose and his logical approach is out of place for such a matter.
  • 1bigschwantz - Jul 02, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    These 'studies' dont mention that in countries like Japan where ownership of firearms by citizens is illegal. There is a higher suicide rate than the west. If someone wants to kill themselves, theyll find a way.
  • moebiex - Jul 02, 2008
    • Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
    So 2% of firearm killings were legal and intentional while the remaining 98% were accidental, illegal or intentional suicide. It seems to me that basing a constitutional decision like this on a fraction of the 2% part, assuming that the self-defence rationale applies to this category, is itself a contradiction of the Constitution in that 98% of the deaths associated with these tools so unceremoniously ignores that inconvenient First Right mentioned in the Constitution- the Right to Life, followed of course by Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    It seems that this decision holds that the Right to bear arms is apparently a superior Right, despite being only part of the Second Amendment. The other part of that Amendment, ie. something about a well regulated militia, is not addressed even though it probably remains key to finding an effective compromise.

    Maybe someone can work the numbers to estimate how many hundreds of thousands of people are being condemned to needless premature death and how many millions to being terrorized and traumatized because of this decision over the next few decades. Independent (frontier) justice may be good for a number of things, but I do not think security in a civilized setting is one of them. Of course, in the 1770's civilized settings in North America were few and far between and that was not likely too much of a consideration.
  • makotech222 - Jul 04, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    well one more reason we need no tolerance gun control. damn idiots up in washington allowing more guns on the streets where most of the time they end up with unresponsible people. Even if these statistics arent right, people need to understand that this is no longer an age of war like back in the 1700s, but an age of laws. Citizens dont need guns.
  • Amy_Steri - Jul 05, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    "Citizens don't need guns"

    Lets see what you think when its late at night and you hear glass break and the stairs are creaking up towards your bed room. Will you be happy waiting 15 minutes for the cops to show up?

    Some of us WILL NOT leave ourselves unprepared for that or other similar situations. Just because some people can not handle the responsibility of gun ownership does not mean that the rest of us should be deprived of the right to defend our homes.
  • makotech222 - Jul 05, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
    no because i know how to defend myself without being lethal. also there are knives to use if u had to. it would also be more likely that he wouldnt have a gun either because they would be banned. however im not naive, i know that a black market for guns will be created most likely. it will be much harder for criminals to get them though. think of how drugs were made illegal and usage dropped ALOT.
  • x646d63 - Jul 06, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    no because i know how to defend myself without being lethal.


    How do you defend yourself from someone with a gun? Wonder bracelets not allowed.

    also there are knives to use if u had to.


    I'm not a defense expert, but if knives were effective against guns, I'm guessing that guns wouldn't be so popular.

    it would also be more likely that he wouldnt have a gun either because they would be banned.


    Someone not interested in respecting the law (breaking in), would, um, be not interested in respecting the law (gun ownership.)

    I might note that making guns illegal will not, in fact, make them all disappear magically.

    however im not naive [sic]


    I sincerely doubt that.

    i know that a black market for guns will be created most likely.


    Enlarged, maybe. Ever read about prohibition? Might want to check on how effective that was.

    it will be much harder for criminals to get them though.


    No, if the market is enlarged (or "created" as you wrongly suggested) then it would actually be easier.

    think of how drugs were made illegal and usage dropped ALOT. [sic]


    Have a citation for that? Which drugs?
  • Amy_Steri - Jul 06, 2008
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    Knives? Real life is not like the movies. If you get in a knife fight, both of you are VERY likely to be severely injured, no matter how good you (think) you are.
  • Glis - Jul 07, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)

    It seems that this decision holds that the Right to bear arms is apparently a superior Right, despite being only part of the Second Amendment.


    The second amendment ensures that all other amendments are acted on accordingly. The right to bear arms isn't for protection againt your neighbor, it's protection against tyranny. You cannot overtake an armed populous with force.

    We are supposed to give up our rights so that we can be protected from ourselves? If that is the case then we are savages, and only the meanest and greediest savages lead.
  • moebiex - Jul 07, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)

    Lets see what you think when its late at night and you hear glass break and the stairs are creaking up towards your bed room.

    Paranoia will destroy ya- I betcha even a yappy little dog or two would spook most (99% ) of those guys. If that doesn't work for you- how about 40 lb Border Collie or a 60 lb Lab. Oh yeah - I forgot- dogs aren't suitable for city living, but I guess guns are. Guns let you play God, dogs generally don't.

    Another quote- Some of us WILL NOT leave ourselves unprepared for that or other similar situations. Just because some people can not handle the responsibility of gun ownership does not mean that the rest of us should be deprived of the right to defend our homes.

    I guess that includes your kids, and your kid's pals, and your kid's pal's cousins. Every time I hear of someone going postal I think "dang its a good thing guns are not restricted- otherwise no one would have any way to defend themselves". Too bad though about the massive increases in suicides and shooting accidents where people, often kids, kill themselves or their freinds. Of course- how many real people actually casually carry guns on their daily routines- in bear or cougar country- absolutely - but in town - no one I know or probably even want to know. And how many decent folk are not going to be totally nervous or hesitate as long as possible or longer when pulling the trigger. Give your head a shake- - there's a lot more to life than waiting for someone to shoot you so you can shoot first. Lose the guns- at least when you are in town.

July 1st, 2008 all stories
Medicine & Health / Other

Comments: 11
Rank: 4.3/5 after 9 votes

  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • Share it:
  • share on Facebook
  • share on MySpace
  • share on Slashdot
  • rss-newsfeed
  • share on Google
  • share on Reddit
  • add to delicious
  • save to Yahoo! bookmarks
  • share on Windows Live
  • Add to Mixx!
Rating: 4.3/5 after 9 votes

  • Related Stories

  • Pressure to be a supergirl is causing teen mental health crisis
    created Feb 10, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Key to virulence protein entry into host cells discovered
    created Aug 04, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Researchers analyze domestic violence deaths
    created Nov 07, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Economists find critique of gun buyback flawed
    created Apr 23, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Guns in homes strongly associated with higher rates of suicide
    created Apr 10, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Tags

gun

  • Physicists Demonstrate Quantum Memory with Matter Qubits
    Physicists Demonstrate Quantum Memory with Matter Qubits
    Physics / General Physics
    created Jul 03, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (17) | comments 1
  • 'Holey' Nanosheets for Wastewater Dye Removal
    Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials
    created Jul 01, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 1
  • Jellyfish Robot Swims Like its Biological Counterpart
    Jellyfish Robot Swims Like its Biological Counterpart
    Electronics / Robotics
    created Jun 26, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (8) | comments 1
  • Could Maxwell's Demon Exist in Nanoscale Systems?
    Could Maxwell's Demon Exist in Nanoscale Systems?
    Physics / General Physics
    created Jun 24, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (18) | comments 29
  • Living Safely with Robots, Beyond Asimov's Laws
    Living Safely with Robots, Beyond Asimov's Laws
    Electronics / Robotics
    created Jun 22, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (52) | comments 40
  • Other News

    Variations in 5 genes raise risk for most common brain tumors

    Medicine & Health / Genetics

    created 6 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

    Common genetic variations spread across five genes raise a person's risk of developing the most frequent type of brain tumor, an international research team reports online in Nature Genetics.


    Researchers highlight new direction for drug discovery

    Medicine & Health / Research

    created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

    In a discovery that rebuffs conventional scientific thinking, researchers at Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) have discovered a novel way to block the activity of the fusion protein responsible for Ewing's sarcoma, ...


    MicroRNAs hold promise for treating diseases in blood vessels

    Medicine & Health / Research

    created 6 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

    A newly discovered mechanism controls whether muscle cells in blood vessels hasten the development of both atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease, according to an article published online today in the journal Nature.


    Wind power may have its own environmental problems

    Medicine & Health / Health

    created 5 hours ago | popularity 3.8 / 5 (5) | comments 2

    Wind power generation is expected to be a clean and environmentally friendly natural energy source, but a new kind of environmental problem has surfaced as infrasonic waves caused by windmills are suspected of causing health ...


    Malaysian authorities seize 'Viagra coffee' : report

    Medicine & Health / Health

    created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

    Malaysia's health authorities have seized over 20,000 dollars worth of coffee mixed with sildenafil, the main ingredient in erectile dysfunction drug Viagra, a report said Sunday.