A Better Shot at Immunization

July 16, 2008

A new immunization strategy could reduce the vaccine doses needed to protect a population from disease (and reduce the antivirus updates required to protect a network of computers) by as much as 50%.

The immunization scheme was developed by a collaboration of physicists from Boston University, Bar-Ilan University in Israel, and Stockholm University. It's similar to previous strategies that focus on immunizing the most highly connected people (or computers) first.

The more connections you have to neighbors, coworkers, customers, and relations, the more vital it is to make sure you don't catch the disease and pass it on to your many contacts. Once the most highly connected people are protected, it's time to move to the next most highly connected people, and so on down the list. The benefit of the technique is that only a fraction of the population has to be vaccinated in order to quash an epidemic.

The innovation in the new immunization strategy focuses on using the connections among a network of people to assign them to a number of small, but equally sized groups. Then people in each group are immunized based on their connections within the group. The equipartioning is key - other immunization methods tend to be less efficient because they overemphasize immunizations of small clusters of individuals relative to larger clusters. That can't happen if population is divided up so that all the clusters are the same size.

The physicists confirmed the effectiveness of their scheme by simulating infections on various populations, including an Internet-based computer network and a network of Swedish workers and their families compiled by the Swedish government. The need for immunization was reduced by 5% to 50% in each of the networks, significantly lowering the potential expense and time that it would take to protect populations and networks from contagious infections.

Citation: Yiping Chen, Gerald Paul, Shlomo Havlin, Fredrik Liljeros, and H.Eugene Stanley
Physical Review A (forthcoming, a PRL Editors' Suggested paper)

Source: APS

• Mercury_01 - Jul 17, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  I got a better immunization strategy: Stop injecting all that f***ing poison into our kids and find a better dilivery system than that formaldahyde coctail. I personally know of 2 kids whos lives have been ruined by immunizations. one is autistic and one is almost totally brain dead. both were healthy and happy untill age 2 when they recieved multiple shots of TOXIC SUBSTANCES.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• lowbatteries - Jul 20, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  You personally know of 2 kids whose lives have been ruined by vaccines? How many kids do you know who's lives have been saved? How many kids do you know who don't have polio? Smallpox? Measles? Mumps?
  
  The is the same mentality which makes people afraid of terrorists but they don't buckle up their seatbelt while driving - the extroardinary outways the every day occurence, against all logic.
  
  
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Mercury_01 - Jul 21, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  The government poisoning children IS an everyday occurance. Every person in history that has recieved these immunizations has been effected negatively. You included. I said nothing of curing diseases, nor of the vaccenes themselves. Im talking about the delivery system. go back and read it again.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5