Nanoparticle Research Points to Energy Savings

July 23, 2008
Nanoparticle Research Points to Energy Savings

Enlarge

Nanoparticle additives to lubricants commonly combined with refrigerants used in chillers may encourage secondary nucleation-bubbles on top of bubbles. The double-bubble effect enhances boiling heat transfer and, ultimately, could help to boost the energy efficiency of industrial-sized cooling systems. Image: NIST

(PhysOrg.com) -- Adding just the right dash of nanoparticles to standard mixes of lubricants and refrigerants could yield the equivalent of an energy-saving chill pill for factories, hospitals, ships, and others with large cooling systems, suggest the latest results from National Institute of Standards and Technology research that is pursuing promising formulations.

NIST experiments with varying concentrations of nanoparticle additives indicate a major opportunity to improve the energy efficiency of large industrial, commercial, and institutional cooling systems known as chillers. These systems account for about 13 percent of the power consumed by the nation’s buildings, and about 9 percent of the overall demand for electric power, according to the Department of Energy.

NIST researcher Mark Kedzierski has found that dispersing “sufficient” amounts of copper oxide particles (30 nanometers in diameter) in a common polyester lubricant and combining it with an equally pedestrian refrigerant (R134a) improves heat transfer by between 50 percent and 275 percent. “We were astounded,” he says.

Results of this work have been presented at recent conferences and will be reported in an upcoming issue of the ASME Journal of Heat Transfer.

Just how nanomaterial additives to lubricants improve the dynamics of heat transfer in refrigerant/lubricant mixtures is not thoroughly understood. The NIST research effort aims to fill gaps in knowledge that impede efforts to determine and, ultimately, predict optimal combinations of the three types of substances.

“As with all good things, the process is far from foolproof,” Kedzierski explains. “In fact, an insufficient amount or the wrong type of particles might lead to degradation in performance.”

On the basis of work so far, the researcher speculates several factors likely account for nanoparticle-enabled improvements in heat-transfer performance. For one, nanoparticles of materials with high thermal conductivity improve heat transfer rates for the system. Preliminary results of the NIST research also indicate that, in sufficient concentrations, nanomaterials enhance heat transfer by encouraging more vigorous boiling of the mixture. The tiny particles stimulate, in effect, double bubbles—secondary bubbles that form atop bubbles initiated at the boiling site. Bubbles carry heat away from the surface, and the fact that they’re being formed more efficiently because of the nanoparticles means the heat gets transferred more readily.

Other interactions, Kedzierski says, also are likely to contribute to the dramatic performance improvements reported at NIST and elsewhere.

Success in optimizing recipes of refrigerants, lubricants and nanoparticle additives would pay immediate and long-term dividends. If they did not harm other aspects of equipment performance, high-performance mixtures could be swapped into existing chillers, resulting in immediate energy savings. And, because of improved energy efficiency, next-generation equipment would be smaller, requiring fewer raw materials in their manufacture.

Provided by NIST

4.9 /5 (23 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
Jul 23, 2008

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
this is a really exciting time for science, every facet of our industrial and domestic technologies can be boosted by nanotech
superhuman
Jul 23, 2008

Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Yes, but our health can be ruined if we are not careful enough.
fuchikoma
Jul 23, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I agree that we should watch these closely for health effects. This doesn't sound risky to me, but if they were added for example to motor oil, I would want to ensure that no harmful nanoparticles are expelled in an active form from vehicle exhaust.

We should be very careful with anything that can render the blood-brain barrier irrelevant.
YankInOz
Jul 23, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
nanotechnology is not new... we have been exposed to it for millions of years. We are just discovering ways to create "nano-environments" in the lab. I might suggest that if you want to test the health effects of exposure to nanotechnology - just hold your breath! You'll get the picture.

FUD will not make nanotechnology better or worse. concentrated "anything" - cigarette smoke, alcohol, heroin, etc... can cause serious problems. What are we doing about this? Oh, wait - money is too precious to consider the health risks of these "nano-particles" entering our bodies!

GMAFB...
superhuman
Jul 25, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
nanotechnology is not new... we have been exposed to it for millions of years.


You are wrong, we were exposed only to a tiny fraction of what we can make.

Certain kinds of carbon nanotubes were for example shown (reported on this site) to easily enter inside human cells including into the nucleus where our genetic material is stored. As long stiff molecules they are guaranteed to interfere with cell's molecular machinery. Due to their exotic structure not present in natural environment we have not evolved any defenses against them - no way to decompose or expel them from the cell and the body. This is a very serious situation and nanotubes should be banned from mass market until further research can better evaluate their impact on us and our environment.

I'm a big fan of nanotechnology, I believe it holds tremendous promise for humanity and I am doing some research in the area myself but I also see the risks very clearly and I'd really like others to show some caution too.
Not only human lives and our environment are at stake but there is also a potential for a huge setback in public acceptance and funding of this emerging field if the first wave of commercial products proves toxic and incites public hysteria.
NeilFarbstein
Jan 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Vulvox Inc. has been undertaking experiments on heat exchange materials.
HTTP://VULVOX.TRIPOD.COM
NeilFarbstein
Jan 10, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
nanotechnology is not new... we have been exposed to it for millions of years.


You are wrong, we were exposed only to a tiny fraction of what we can make.

Certain kinds of carbon nanotubes were for example shown (reported on this site) to easily enter inside human cells including into the nucleus where our genetic material is stored. As long stiff molecules they are guaranteed to interfere with cell's molecular machinery. Due to their exotic structure not present in natural environment we have not evolved any defenses against them - no way to decompose or expel them from the cell and the body. This is a very serious situation and nanotubes should be banned from mass market until further research can better evaluate their impact on us and our environment.

I'm a big fan of nanotechnology, I believe it holds tremendous promise for humanity and I am doing some research in the area myself but I also see the risks very clearly and I'd really like others to show some caution too.
Not only human lives and our environment are at stake but there is also a potential for a huge setback in public acceptance and funding of this emerging field if the first wave of commercial products proves toxic and incites public hysteria.

Don't believe we should ban nanotubes altogether. The longer nanotubes cause the same problems as long asbestos fibers. they get into the lungs and casue mesothelioma. Should we ban TVs with nanotubes in their screens? A lot of the things nanotubes do can be done with graphene nanoplatelts which are much less studied but they have shown no bad side effects to date. They do not have the huge aspect ratio (very long and thin) that nanotubes have. They might cut cells in half but their bigger surface area makes it likely the bloodstream will dislodge them from cells contacting the circulation. They would kill cells in the lungs if they were partly wedged into them, and that would cause localized necrosis. Granuloma might be damaged accordingly. If there is damage it wont be cancer but something else.


Rank 4.9 /5 (23 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • polymer nanocomposites
    createdFeb 10, 2012
  • Corrosion Tests on Magnesium
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • polyethylene copper nanocomposite
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • Output of xrd analysis
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Transport phenomena problem based on problems 18.B11 and 19B.6 from Bird, stewart, lw
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • Help with material selection - Car Piston
    createdFeb 05, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Materials & Chemical Engineering

More news stories

'Smart' microcapsules in a single step

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new, single-step method of fabricating microcapsules, which have potential commercial applications in industries including medicine, agriculture and diagnostics, has been developed by researchers ...

Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

created 4 minutes ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

NDSU nano research could impact flexible electronic devices

A discovery by a research team at NDSU and the National Institute of Standards and Technology shows the flexibility and durability of carbon nanotube films and coatings are intimately linked to their electronic properties. ...

Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

created 1 hour ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Lab study raises questions over nano-particle impact

Tests involving chickens have raised questions about the impact on health from engineered nano-particles, the ultra-fine grains commonly used in drugs and processed foods, scientists said on Sunday.

Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

created 18 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (9) | comments 4

New kind of solar cell could capture significantly more energy than current cells

New solar cells could increase the maximum efficiency of solar panels by over 25%, according to scientists from the University of Cambridge.

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created Feb 08, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (14) | comments 14 | with audio podcast

'Dark plasmons' transmit energy

Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (10) | comments 1 | with audio podcast


Researchers make better heat sensor based on butterfly wings

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have long known that butterfly wings produce their iridescent colors by bouncing light around and between tiny ridges in structures made of chitin. More recently they’ve discovered ...

Manipulating genes with hidden TALENs

(PhysOrg.com) -- A better understanding of gene function in model plant and animal systems could be used to develop useful traits in livestock and crop plants, and might someday lead to developments in stem ...

Alien matter in the solar system: A galactic mismatch

This just in: The Solar System is different from the space just outside it.

Transforming galaxies

(PhysOrg.com) -- Many of the Universe's galaxies are like our own, displaying beautiful spiral arms wrapping around a bright nucleus. Examples in this stunning image, taken with the Wide Field Camera 3 on ...

Don't ignore kids' snores

(Medical Xpress) -- Your ears aren’t playing tricks on you – that is the sound of snoring you hear from the bedroom of your preschooler. Snoring is common in children, but in some cases it can be a symptom of a ...

China's pollution puts a dent in its economy

Although China has made substantial progress in cleaning up its air pollution,a new MIT study shows that the economic impact from ozone and particulates in its air has increased dramatically. ...