N.M. cavers chart unique 'snowy' river of crystals

July 24, 2008 By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN , Associated Press Writer

Caver John McLean talks about the many questions scientists have about the Snowy River formation while on an expedition in Fort Stanton Cave, N.M., on July 3, 2008. New Mexico's two U.S. senators have proposed legislation to designate the cave and Snowy River as a national conservation area. (AP Photo/Susan Montoya Bryan)

(AP) -- Hundreds of feet beneath Earth's surface, a few seasoned cave explorers venture where no human has set foot. Their headlamps illuminate mud-covered walls, gypsum crystals and mineral deposits. The real attraction, though, is under their shoes.

Similar stories from PHYSorg:

Tiny pieces of 'deep time' brought to the surface

Mar 03, 2008 | 4.2 / 5 (19) | 0

New Danish research shows how oil gets stuck underground

May 11, 2009 | 5 / 5 (2) | 0

Ancient ape ruled out of man's ancestral line

Dec 07, 2006 | 3.7 / 5 (24) | 0

Technology opens promise, perils of ocean mining

Apr 01, 2009 | 3 / 5 (2) | 1

Unusual microbial ropes grow slowly in cave lake

Dec 20, 2008 | 5 / 5 (4) | 1

• DoctorKnowledge - Jul 24, 2008
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
  "Unknown to science". Gimme a break. "Scientists" as such don't own knowledge, they aren't the only people who make discoveries. The microbes were just "unknown". (And hey, "unknown to the most select groups of published, acknowledged, famous, up-and-coming,world-class scientists, at that.) I.e., "unknown".
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• thales - Jul 24, 2008
  • Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
  Here's your break, Doctor: they can't claim it's unknown to you without assuming what you know. Maybe you did already know about these microbes. Thus, "unknown to science" is LESS arrogant than "unknown to anyone".
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• jeffsaunders - Jul 25, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
  perhaps unclassified would have been more grammatically correct.
  
  As there have been plenty of discoveries "unknown to science" of animal species that were commonly hunted and eaten by indigenous peoples.
  
  To claim that none of these peoples was a scientist is pretty damn arrogant.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• DoctorKnowledge - Jul 30, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  Note that thales just misrepresented -- in the best scientific tradition -- misquoting me. I didn't write "unknown to anyone", I specifically said the phrase "unknown to science" was not appropriate, because it implies that only scientists can know things.
  
  jeffsaunders got the point, and added his perspective.
  
  On the other hand, thales' unlogical comment, which makes no point, except to abstractly criticize, appealed to Trippy, mikiwud, Corvidae, MrFred, RAL, Mercury_01, and yyz. Obviously deep thinkers, all.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5