Toolbox
  • User rankingRating: 4.7
  • Add to favoritesBookmark
  • Save as PDFSave as PDF
  • PrintPrint
  • EmailEmail
  • Blog ItBlog It
  • Stumble ItStumble It!
Digg It Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Save to Windows live Share on facebook Save to MySpace Slashdot it science news feed Add to google
- size +

N.M. cavers chart unique 'snowy' river of crystals

By SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN , Associated Press Writer, Space & Earth science / Earth Sciences
Caver John McLean talks about the many questions scientists have about the Snowy River formation while on an expedition in Fort Stanton Cave N.M. on July 3 2008. New Mexicos two U.S. senators have proposed legislation to designate the cave and Snowy  ...
Caver John McLean talks about the many questions scientists have about the Snowy River formation while on an expedition in Fort Stanton Cave, N.M., on July 3, 2008. New Mexico's two U.S. senators have proposed legislation to designate the cave and Snowy River as a national conservation area. (AP Photo/Susan Montoya Bryan)

(AP) -- Hundreds of feet beneath Earth's surface, a few seasoned cave explorers venture where no human has set foot. Their headlamps illuminate mud-covered walls, gypsum crystals and mineral deposits. The real attraction, though, is under their shoes.




Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .




» Next Article in Space & Earth science - Earth Sciences: Controlling nitrogen pollution will not stop toxic algae blooms, says research

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4.7 out of 5 after 22 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by DoctorKnowledge 07/24/08 11:46
Rank: 1/5 after 7 votes
"Unknown to science". Gimme a break. "Scientists" as such don't own knowledge, they aren't the only people who make discoveries. The microbes were just "unknown". (And hey, "unknown to the most select groups of published, acknowledged, famous, up-and-coming,world-class scientists, at that.) I.e., "unknown".
Posted by thales 07/24/08 13:02
Rank: 4.43/5 after 7 votes
Here's your break, Doctor: they can't claim it's unknown to you without assuming what you know. Maybe you did already know about these microbes. Thus, "unknown to science" is LESS arrogant than "unknown to anyone".
Posted by jeffsaunders 07/25/08 02:23
Rank: 5/5 after 2 votes
perhaps unclassified would have been more grammatically correct.

As there have been plenty of discoveries "unknown to science" of animal species that were commonly hunted and eaten by indigenous peoples.

To claim that none of these peoples was a scientist is pretty damn arrogant.
Posted by DoctorKnowledge 07/30/08 19:57
Not rated yet.
Note that thales just misrepresented -- in the best scientific tradition -- misquoting me. I didn't write "unknown to anyone", I specifically said the phrase "unknown to science" was not appropriate, because it implies that only scientists can know things.

jeffsaunders got the point, and added his perspective.

On the other hand, thales' unlogical comment, which makes no point, except to abstractly criticize, appealed to Trippy, mikiwud, Corvidae, MrFred, RAL, Mercury_01, and yyz. Obviously deep thinkers, all.