Why play a losing game? Study uncovers why low-income people buy lottery tickets

July 24, 2008

Although state lotteries, on average, return just 53 cents for every dollar spent on a ticket, people continue to pour money into them — especially low-income people, who spend a larger percentage of their incomes on lottery tickets than do the wealthier segments of society. A new Carnegie Mellon University study sheds light on the reasons why low-income lottery players eagerly invest in a product that provides poor returns.

In the study, published in the July issue of the Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, participants who were made to feel subjectively poor bought nearly twice as many lottery tickets as a comparison group that was made to feel subjectively more affluent. The Carnegie Mellon findings point to poverty's central role in people's decisions to buy lottery tickets.

"Some poor people see playing the lottery as their best opportunity for improving their financial situations, albeit wrongly so," said the study's lead author Emily Haisley, a doctoral student in the Department of Organizational Behavior and Theory at Carnegie Mellon's Tepper School of Business. "The hope of getting out of poverty encourages people to continue to buy tickets, even though their chances of stumbling upon a life-changing windfall are nearly impossibly slim and buying lottery tickets in fact exacerbates the very poverty that purchasers are hoping to escape."

The researchers influenced participants' perceptions of their relative wealth — or lack thereof — by having them complete a survey on their opinions of the city of Pittsburgh that included an item on annual income. The group made to feel poor was asked to provide its income on a scale that began at "less than $100,000" and went upward from there in $100,000 increments, ensuring that most respondents would be in the lowest income category. The group made to feel subjectively wealthier was asked to report income on a scale that began with "less than $10,000" and increased in $10,000 increments, leading most respondents to be in a middle or upper tier.

Participants, who were recruited at Pittsburgh's Greyhound Bus terminal, were paid $5 for completing the survey and given the opportunity to buy as many as five scratch-off lottery tickets. The experimental group purchased an average of 1.27 lottery tickets, compared with 0.67 tickets bought by the members of the control group.

A second experiment reported in the paper found that indirectly reminding participants that, while different income groups face unequal outcomes in education, jobs and housing, everyone has equal chances of winning the lottery induced an increase in the number of lottery tickets purchased. The group given this reminder purchased 1.31 tickets, compared with 0.54 for the group not given such a reminder.

In the study, the researchers note that lotteries set off a vicious cycle that not only exploits low-income individuals' desires to escape poverty but also directly prevents them from improving upon their financial situations. They recommend that state lottery administrators explore strategies that balance the economic burdens faced by low-income households with the need to maintain important funding streams for state governments.

"State lotteries are popular revenue sources that are unlikely to go away anytime soon," said George Loewenstein, a study co-author and Herbert A. Simon professor of economics and psychology at Carnegie Mellon. "However, it is possible to implement measures that can actually benefit low-income lottery players and lead to fairer outcomes." Loewenstein noted that one such potential method for addressing income inequality, which has shown promise in other countries, is tying lottery tickets to savings accounts.

Source: Carnegie Mellon University

4.1 /5 (26 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

JerryPark
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
It is difficult to argue with the desire to hit the lottery. Certainly, further impoverishing one's self is never a good thing. But for the cost of three cigarettes, which will hardly be missed, a person can buy a chance to gain millions of dollars.

Coupled with a reduction in nonessential spending, the cost of a chance to be rich can be a net zero proposition.
barakn
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
The lottery - a voluntary tax on the stupid.
googleplex
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
Here in california the winning odds per single pick are 1 in 41,416,353. It actually pays you to buy all tickets in one lottery to increase your odds. Otherwise your odds never improve.
So my advice is to save up your ticket money for 1 year. Then buy a bunch of picks in a single lottery. Let say you buy 1 ticket per game. Thats 104 tickets per year. So your odds are 104 in 41,416,353 or 1 in 398,234. Make sure that your picks are different!
Alternatively join a syndicate, however syndicates are not enforceable if a legal dispute arises.

aussiecarter
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
What about the time cost? Buying a lottery ticket costs time to visit the store, wait in que, pay for the transaction, dream about winning, read the numbers, feel upset about losing.
bmcghie
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Or, you can buy a coffee with the same money and get INSTANT gratification, albeit with less potential for long term satisfaction. :)
zevkirsh
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
stupidest research ever. i could have written this article in 4 words. poor people want cash!.
Arikin
Jul 24, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
How people are taught to deal with money would influence all groups. Below are two simplified examples:

1. Commit to spending budgets. exa: rent, utilities, % for savings, % entertainment, etc.
2. Use every last cent. As bills are due, spur of the moment purchases, etc.
DoctorKnowledge
Jul 25, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Definitely agree with aussiecarter about the time investment. A similar situation is "clipping discount coupons". There's a study that people doing this generally were earning far less than minimum wage.

However, solving the gambling problem is different, because the people doing it are not being rational. It's obsessive behavior. There's a theory that there's a gambling gene. I would find that hard to believe, except I know people who really are enjoying themselves, taking absurd risks. The adrenaline is flowing. What's sad about it is they don't recognize they are dragging other people into their risk-taking. (Like their families.) It doesn't matter to them, because they are "feeling no pain".

So equally, we can't just condemn them. They have a problem. They need help and deserve sympathy.
gosfordjohn
Jul 25, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
I think it's a case of less income probably stems from less education, hence less understanding of what lotteries really are. Equally, the less hope of bettering your own situation.
Whereas well educated people tend to earn more, understand the nature of lotteries better, and have more ability to improve their lot independently.
Basically, imho, the more desperate you are, the more likely you'll grasp at straws.
Mercury_01
Jul 25, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This reminds me of every time I go to burger king. My wife asks why they always screw up our order. I say because they work at burger king! What does that tell you? Basic anthropic principle.
jburchel
Jul 29, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
How stupid an article. Duh...
Rank 4.1 /5 (26 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

A frank discussion of the power law and linking correlation to causation

(PhysOrg.com) -- Michael Stumpf a mathematics professor at Imperial College in London, and Mason Porter a lecturer at Oxford have teamed together to write and publish a perspective piece in Science regarding the in ...

Other Sciences / Mathematics

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 11 | with audio podcast report

Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'

A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 3.3 / 5 (3) | comments 10

US workers are 'giving away the store,' costing firms billions

Nearly 70 percent of the nation's service employees give away free goods and services – from hamburgers to cable TV – costing companies billions of dollars a year, according to a groundbreaking study.

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 3 / 5 (5) | comments 10

New insights into how to correct false knowledge

The abundance of false information available on the Internet, in movies and on TV has created a big challenge for educators.

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created Feb 07, 2012 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (7) | comments 9 | with audio podcast

Neanderthal demise due to many influences, including cultural changes: study

As an ice age crept upon them thousands of years ago, Neanderthals and modern human ancestors expanded their territory ranges across Asia and Europe to adapt to the changing environment.

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created Feb 07, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (5) | comments 8 | with audio podcast


Overeating may double risk of memory loss

New research suggests that consuming between 2,100 and 6,000 calories per day may double the risk of memory loss, or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), among people age 70 and older. The study was released today and will be ...

Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...

Scientists discover molecular secrets of 2,000-year-old Chinese herbal remedy

For roughly two thousand years, Chinese herbalists have treated Malaria using a root extract, commonly known as Chang Shan, from a type of hydrangea that grows in Tibet and Nepal. More recent studies suggest that halofuginone, ...

New method to examine batteries -- MRI from the inside

There is an ever-increasing need for advanced batteries for portable electronics, such as phones, cameras, and music players, but also to power electric vehicles and to facilitate the distribution and storage of energy derived ...

Lab study raises questions over nano-particle impact

Tests involving chickens have raised questions about the impact on health from engineered nano-particles, the ultra-fine grains commonly used in drugs and processed foods, scientists said on Sunday.

Injured boomers beware: Know when to see doctor

(AP) -- It happened to nurse Jane Byron years after an in-line skating fall, business owner Haralee Weintraub while doing "men's" push-ups, and avid cyclist Gene Wilberg while lifting a heavy box.