Low-cost SpaceX rocket launch test fails

August 4, 2008

(AP) -- SpaceX engineers are investigating the cause of Saturday's failed flight of the Falcon 1, a low-cost, light-lift rocket developed by the Southern California-based company.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


NASA Nanosatellites Catch Ride On Rocket, Demonstrate Technology

created Aug 01, 2008 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (6) | comments 0

SpaceX Delays Maiden Flight of Falcon 1 Rocket

created Nov 27, 2005 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (8) | comments 0

SpaceX Plans Reusable Seven Person Capsule

created Mar 15, 2006 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (9) | comments 0

Japan sends first cargo spacecraft to ISS

created Sep 11, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 1

Rocket test will carry Purdue experiment

created Nov 30, 2009 | popularity 3 / 5 (1) | comments 0


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 3.2 /5 (14 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • earls - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
    not so low-cost now was it? :p
  • timmyeatchips - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Was the payload recovered or was the rocket destroyed?
  • mjporter - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
    It took NASA years of trials to get their launches working reliably. I don't see why this is a surprise to anyone.
  • holoman - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
    German rocket inventor Werner Von Braun shaking his head saying the technology has been around 70 years ! What's the problem.

    Maybe too much PayPal and not enough science.

    Now people will appreciate the job thousands of NASA personnel do to keep America's space program the best !


  • earls - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Shooting trial rockets is all fine and good, obviously, yes, the team/developers needs first hand experience and expertise, room to make mistakes. But when they lose not only the rocket, but the entire payload of three satellites and a dead actor it's hard to gloss over. It's kind of disturbing to me that the failure is so easy rationalized... But then again I guess it wasn't your cargo so - whatever. But what happens when it's SpaceShipTwo or the rocket has passengers onboard and fails...

    As holoman suggests, it would seem like we should be past the random "trial and error" phase of launching rockets, especially when people are depending on them... Maybe SpaceX can recoup costs, but after how many failed rockets are people going to be willing to sacrifice their hard work and effort just to see it go up in a fireball?
  • Sanescience - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    That sucks. You can have a rocket working 99.9% and that .1% will take you down. This is one of the hardest things mankind tries to do and it is worth the investment to develop an improved process to get into orbit so we can open up space for more than the oddball hunk of metal or sideshow human.
  • dirk_bruere - Aug 04, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Yes, it really is Rocket Science.
    Of course, if NASA were doing it they would get it right almost immediately. But instead of spending millions they'd spend billions and the resulting launcher would be vastly more expensive. They would probably take longer as well.
  • DoctorKnowledge - Aug 05, 2008
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    This article isn't news I wanted to hear. This company is underwritten by NASA, which means that they have NASA's blessing, and probably NASA's heavy involvement (I don't know the details, but it would be typical of major NASA commitments to contractors.) Three launch failures = complete program failure.

    One launch failure should be enough to cause a complete program investigation. That investigation should definitively solve, not just that particular problem, but problems with the administration and development process. For a second failure to happen implies gross incompetence or negligence. A third failure? The writing is on the wall. The Inspector General, then Congressional investigation. Not: "Gee, too bad it failed." Anybody who believes this company can turn itself around is sadly mistaken. Pull it apart.

    And, why not get progressive and radical? Fire any NASA employees who were responsible for supervising and okaying this effort.

August 4, 2008 all stories

Comments: 8

3.2 /5 (14 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Obama space panel says moon return plan is a no-go (Update)
    created Sep 08, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Nanomedicine project to be tested in space
    created May 12, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • NASA Nanosatellites Catch Ride On Rocket, Demonstrate Technology
    created Aug 01, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • A Brief History of Solar Sails
    created Aug 01, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • NASA to Attempt Historic Solar Sail Deployment
    created Jun 27, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Gravity on the surface of Gliese 581 d
    created 2 hours ago
  • astronomy
    created Nov 30, 2009
  • mass of molecular clouds versus stars
    created Nov 30, 2009
  • Astronomy Problems PLEASE HELP! PLEASE PLEASE
    created Nov 30, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

Other News

Acid test: Study reveals both losers and winners of CO2-induced ocean acidification

Acid test: Study reveals both losers and winners of CO2-induced ocean acidification

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 8 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 5

(PhysOrg.com) -- As the world’s seawater becomes more acidic due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, some shelled marine creatures may actually become bigger and stronger, according to a new study.


Orbiter Puts Itself Into Safe Standby

Mars Odyssey Orbiter Puts Itself Into Safe Standby

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 7 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter put itself into a safe standby mode on Saturday, Nov. 28, and the team operating the spacecraft has begun implementing careful steps designed to resume Odyssey's ...


A closer look at the Hudson Canyon shows why the canyon is critical for fish

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 8 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

A series of newly discovered pits in the bottom of the Hudson Canyon, 100 miles southeast of New York Harbor, may be a key ingredient for the abundant and diverse marine ecosystem in and around the canyon, according to research ...


Blushing dusty nebula

Blushing dusty nebula

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 9 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (2) | comments 1

On Earth, we tend to find dust nothing more than a nuisance that blankets our furniture and causes us to sneeze. Cosmic dust can also be a hindrance to astronomers because cameras using visible light cannot ...


UK climate scientist to temporarily step down (AP)

UK climate scientist to temporarily step down

Space & Earth / Environment

created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 4

(AP) -- The chief of a prestigious British research center caught in a storm of controversy over claims that he and others suppressed data about climate change has stepped down pending an investigation, the ...