Toolbox
  • User rankingRating: 4.5
  • Add to favoritesBookmark
  • Save as PDFSave as PDF
  • PrintPrint
  • EmailEmail
  • Blog ItBlog It
  • Stumble ItStumble It!
Digg It Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Save to Windows live Share on facebook Save to MySpace Slashdot it science news feed Add to google
- size +

Tevatron experiments double-team Higgs boson

Scientists from the CDF and DZero collaborations at DOEs Fermilab have combined Tevatron data from their two experiments to increase sensitivity for their search for the Higgs boson. While no Higgs boson has been found yet the results announced today ...
Scientists from the CDF and DZero collaborations at DOE's Fermilab have combined Tevatron data from their two experiments to increase sensitivity for their search for the Higgs boson. While no Higgs boson has been found yet, the results announced today exclude a mass for the Higgs of 170 GeV/c2 with 95 percent probability (see graphs). This is the first time that the Tevatron experiments directly restrict the Higgs mass. Earlier experiments at the Large Electron-Positron Collider at CERN excluded a Higgs boson with a mass of less than 114 GeV/c2 at 95 percent probability. The results show that CDF and DZero are sensitive to potential Higgs signals. The Fermilab experimenters will test more and more of the available mass range for the Higgs as their experiments record more collision data and as they continue to refine their experimental analyses. The expected exclusion limit (red-dotted line with green and yellow bands in lower graph) will move up as the two collaborations collect and analyze more data. Credit: Fermilab
Scientists from the CDF and DZero collaborations at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermilab have combined Tevatron data from the two experiments to advance the quest for the long-sought Higgs boson. Their results indicate that Fermilab researchers have for the first time excluded, with 95 percent probability, a mass for the Higgs of 170 GeV.
This value lies near the middle of the possible mass range for the particle established by earlier experiments. This result not only restricts the possible masses where the Higgs might lie, but it also demonstrates that the Tevatron experiments are sensitive to potential Higgs signals.


According to the Standard Model of particles and forces, the Higgs mechanism gives mass to elementary particles such as electrons and quarks. Its discovery would answer one of the big questions in physics: What is the origin of mass? Credit: Fermilab
"These results mean that the Tevatron experiments are very much in the game for finding the Higgs," said Pier Oddone, director of Fermilab.

Combining results from the two collider experiments effectively doubles the data available for analysis by experimenters and allows each experimental group to cross check and confirm the other's results. In the near future, the Fermilab experimenters expect to test more and more of the available mass range for the Higgs.

The Standard Model of Particles and Forces--the theoretical framework for particle physics--predicts the existence of a particle, the Higgs boson, that interacts with other particles of matter to give them mass. The mechanism by which particles acquire different mass values is unknown, and finding evidence for the existence of the Higgs boson would address this fundamental mystery of nature.

The CDF and DZero experiments each comprise some 600 physicists from universities and laboratories from across the nation and around the world. Currently, Fermilab's plans call for the Tevatron experiments to continue operating through 2010. In that time, both groups expect to double their analysis data sets, improving their chances to observe the Higgs.

Scientists expect operations to begin at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, in Europe, sometime later this year. Observation of the Higgs is also a key goal for LHC experiments.

The Tevatron accelerator and the experiments are operating at peak performance. The Tevatron continues to break records for luminosity, the number of high-energy proton-antiproton collisions it produces. The more luminosity the Tevatron delivers, the more chances experimenters have to see the Higgs. Moreover, by continually improving their experimental techniques, the CDF and DZero physicists have been able to boost their sensitivity to the Higgs and other phenomena by more than the margin afforded by the increased data alone.

"The Fermilab collider program is running at full speed," said Dennis Kovar, director of the Office of High Energy Physics at the U.S. Department of Energy. "In the past year alone, the two experiments have produced 77 Ph.D.s and 100 publications that advance the state of our knowledge across the span of particle physics at the energy frontier."

The new Higgs results are among the approximately 150 results that the two experiments presented at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Philadelphia held July 29-August 5.

"The discovery of the Higgs boson would answer one of the big questions in physics today," said Joseph Dehmer, director of the Division of Physics for the National Science Foundation. "We have not heard the last from the Tevatron experiments."

Source: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
» Next Article in Physics - Physics: Superfluid-superconductor relationship is detailed

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4.5 out of 5 after 38 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by earls 08/04/08 14:01
Rank: 2.25/5 after 4 votes
We are here to report there is nothing here to report.
Posted by Velanarris 08/04/08 14:29
Rank: 4/5 after 4 votes
There's quite a bit more there than you'd think.

Remember those logic puzzles you got when you were a kid? If you can determine what it can't be then that leaves only what it can be. It's just another place that physicists don't have to look for the Higgs. It also shows that the tevatron colliders have sufficient energy to possibly find the Higgs. Which means that the LHC definitely has the power to create them.


It's all "relative".
Posted by Sean_W 08/04/08 16:57
Rank: 3.5/5 after 2 votes
I think I have had a stroke and lost my ability to read. I can understand how they can rule out lower values but how do they exclude the higher energies without being able to test them yet?
Posted by NeilFarbstein 08/05/08 00:08
Rank: 3/5 after 3 votes
the higgs particle theory cannot even explain the variety of particles each with a different mass. Maybe the Higgs theory is a lot of hot air.
Posted by jburchel 08/05/08 00:49
Rank: 1/5 after 1 vote
What the hell is "It's all 'relative'" supposed to mean in Velanarris' comment? Probably one of those idiots who think Einstein's theory has something to say about ethics. I don't understand it myself, but I understand it, and people, well enough to know most people (including many "scientists") who pretend they have an inkling of understanding about relativity or quantum physics are clueless losers.
Posted by ancible 08/05/08 02:48
Rank: 4/5 after 1 vote
jburchel- I take Velanarris' comment to mean that the value of such knowledge is relevant to some lines of questioning and not others (such as earls' view of the report). Now I feel obligated to point out that "I don't understand it myself, but I understand it..." could also be hard to interpret, though obviously there is a logical thought behind your words (it just takes reading that sentence a few times).

Perhaps we can all just accept that the written word is not a perfect conveyor of thought, and gloss over the occasional misspeak without getting angry?
Posted by mattytheory 08/05/08 02:58
Rank: 5/5 after 1 vote
@velanarris: The primary mode of human learning is facilitated by the knowledge of what we know something to be because we know what it is NOT. By determining what not to look for we can understand what we should look for. In any event, if the Higgs Theory is wrong, we will only know by looking in every possible place and coming up with, as NeilFarbstein put it (above this comment), nothing but a lot of "hot air".
Posted by ancible 08/05/08 06:48
Rank: 4/5 after 1 vote
@mattytheory- seems like velanarris is one of the ones who agree with you.
Posted by CaptSpaulding 08/05/08 10:05
Not rated yet.
Standard science is using an educated guess to figure out the starting reason for where to look and then bounding this location with a bunch of "is nots"
Posted by Velanarris 08/05/08 12:29
Not rated yet.
What the hell is "It's all 'relative'" supposed to mean in Velanarris' comment?


The Tevatron and LHC are Relativistic Colliders. Thanks for insinuating I'm a clueless loser while completely missing the reference.