Switching it up: How memory deals with a change in plans

August 18, 2008

You're about to leave work at the end of the day when your cell phone rings: it's your spouse, asking that you pick up a gallon of milk on the way home. Before you head out the door, though, your spouse calls again and asks you to stop by the hardware store too. Based on your knowledge of the area and rush-hour traffic, you decide to get the milk first and the toilet plunger second. But whoops! The phone rings again. This time, it's your boss, asking you to work late. That means another change of plans.

Adjusting our behavior to such changing circumstances enables us to achieve our goals. But how, exactly, do our brains switch so elegantly and quickly from one well-entrenched plan to a newer one in reaction to a sudden change in circumstances? In the milk-hardware-boss example, do we simply remember a list of streets and turns, or do we remember a more abstract set of "rules" governing the web of relationships between the items we want to buy, our driving route and our relationships with spouse and employer?

The answer is "both," according to researchers at The Johns Hopkins University, who have learned that two different areas of the brain are responsible for the way human beings handle complex sets of "if-then" rules. The researchers, led by Susan Courtney, associate professor of psychological and brain sciences at the Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, learned that rules that people must actively remember (in other words, which are not part of their everyday habits) are controlled primarily through the prefrontal cortex, which is in the very front of the brain, beneath the forehead.

"This discovery may eventually lead to enhanced understanding of psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and attention deficit disorder, all conditions in which a person's ability to remember and change such rules is impaired," said Courtney, lead author of a paper in a recent issue of Neuron.

Courtney and her team used mental math tasks (a good working example of "if-then" rules) and functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate which areas of the brain are used for different functions. Before beginning the study, participants memorized the numbers 47 and 53 and the operations (rules) "add" and "subtract". Only one of these two numbers and one of those two operations were relevant to any given trial. For example, participants would begin by remembering either 47 or 53 and the instructions to either "add" or "subtract." They then would be given a second number, which they would add to or subtract from the first until instructed to make a change. That change could involve keeping the add or subtract "rule" and switching the number, keeping the number and switching the rule, or switching both the beginning number and the "rule."

Courtney said that if we hold both rule and number in our memory in the same way, then there would be no difference in the pattern of activity when people were asked to switch up the rules compared to when they changed numbers, because both rules and numbers would be in the same place in memory.

But that's not what they found.

Instead, they discovered that the prefrontal cortex became more active when participants had to switch rules, and a different part of the brain – the parietal cortex, which is near the back of the head – became more active when the participants were asked to switch numbers.

"This indicates that different parts of our brains store different kinds of memories and information," Courtney said. That, she said, "provides clues about how the human brain accomplishes complex, goal-directed behaviors that require remembering and changing abstract rules, an ability that is disrupted in many mental illnesses."

Source: Johns Hopkins University


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 3.6 /5 (13 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • Amanullah - Aug 18, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    ohh what does it all mean.
  • superhuman - Aug 18, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    It means that psychology is not far from where it was 100 years ago - still unable to definitely prove or disapprove anything, even when equipped with marvels of engineering like fMRI.
  • Latrosicarius - Aug 18, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    The article might as well have said:

    "This is how memory works:
    These two areas do something and bam, it works."
  • gmurphy - Aug 19, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    well actually, this experiment is interesting in that it clearly identifies two areas of the brain with unique functional properties. The prefrontal cortex is used for complex thinking whilst the parietal cortex is used more in memory, which makes sense from what the article says. This in and of itself isn't breaking new ground but in order to give ourselves a shot at understanding a system as complex as the brain; eliminating uncertainty and confirming hypotheses through experiments like these are the only way we can go.
  • Tesla2 - Aug 19, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    The first three yahoos in this thread need to bring their arrogance down a notch. When they can design and/or reverse engineer a system that is 1/1000 the complexity of the human brain, then they might be qualified to make the statements above. Until then, be aware that the effort that this experiment is geared toward (understanding the human brain) is the most difficult effort that humankind has ever undertaken.

August 18, 2008 all stories

Comments: 5

3.6 /5 (13 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • The court will now call its expert witness: the brain
    created Nov 20, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Phantom limbs learn impossible tricks
    created Oct 28, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Study identifies which children do not need CT scans after head trauma
    created Sep 15, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Junking old electronic equipment does not compute
    created Jul 31, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Review provides new insights into the causes of anorexia
    created Jul 21, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Chest x-ray???
    created 2 hours ago
  • Multiple Sclerosis & CCSVI
    created 22 hours ago
  • 23 Years in a Vegetative State....or not?
    created Nov 25, 2009
  • Has the H1N1 vaccine been scientifically proven to work?
    created Nov 24, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

Other News

Overeating can set stage for obesity, researchers say

Medicine & Health / Health

created 8 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

It doesn't seem like a fair fight. In one corner loomed the Thanksgiving table, groaning with poultry, pie and mashed potatoes.


eye

Over-the-counter eye drops raise concern over antibiotic resistance

Medicine & Health / Medications

created 15 hours ago | popularity 3.5 / 5 (2) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- The use of antibiotic eye drops for conjunctivitis has increased by almost half since they became available over the counter at chemists in 2005, data obtained by Oxford University researchers ...


New tools for prediction of disease progression in acute childhood leukemia

Medicine & Health / Cancer

created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at Uppsala University and University Children’s Hospital in Uppsala have devised powerful new tools for typing cells from children with acute lymphatic leukemia and for prediction of how children ...


Nuclear science to fight sleeping sickness

Medicine & Health / Diseases

created 11 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

The International Atomic Energy Agency on Friday announced an agreement to help African nations battle the tsetse fly, the main carrier of parasites that causes sleeping sickness with its bites.


What a grind: Bruxism at night likely a sign of stress by day

Medicine & Health / Health

created 3 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

You can practically track Steve Barkley's stress by the level of activity in his temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, the hinge joint that connects the lower jaw to the temporal bone of the skull and helps one chew, talk and ...