Drier, warmer springs in US Southwest stem from human-caused changes in winds
August 19, 2008
The late-winter/early-spring storm activity in the western US has shifted north since the late 1970s. This graphic shows how the peak winter storm tracks have shifted poleward since 1978. The blue line shows the storm track for February, March and April of 1978. The red line shows the track for the same months during the year 1997. Credit: Stephanie McAfee, the University of Arizona, 2008.
Human-driven changes in the westerly winds are bringing hotter and drier springs to the American Southwest, according to new research from The University of Arizona in Tucson.
Since the 1970s the winter storm track in the western U.S. has been shifting north, particularly in the late winter. As a result, fewer winter storms bring rain and snow to Southern California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, western Colorado and western New Mexico.
"We used to have this season from October to April where we had a chance for a storm," said Stephanie A. McAfee. "Now it's from October to March."
The finding is the first to link the poleward movement of the westerly winds to the changes observed in the West's winter storm pattern. The change in the westerlies is driven by the atmospheric effects of global warming and the ozone hole combined.
"When you pull the storm track north, it takes the storms with it," said McAfee, a doctoral candidate in the UA's department of geosciences.
"During the period it's raining less, it also tends to be warmer than it used to be," McAfee said. "We're starting to see the impacts of climate change in the late winter and early spring, particularly in the Southwest. It's a season-specific kind of drought."
Having drier, warmer conditions occur earlier in the year will affect snowpack, hydrological processes and water resources, McAfee said.
Other researchers, including the UA's Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research Director Tom Swetnam, have linked warmer, drier springs to more and larger forest fires.
McAfee's co-author Joellen L. Russell said, "We're used to thinking about climate change as happening sometime in the future to someone else, but this is right here and affects us now. The future is here."
McAfee and Russell, a UA assistant professor of geosciences, will publish their paper, Northern Annular Mode Impact on Spring Climate in the Western United States, in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funded the research via the Climate Assessment for the Southwest program at the UA.
Atmospheric scientists have documented that the westerly winds, or storm track, have been shifting poleward for several decades. The southwestern U.S. has experienced less winter precipitation during the same period.
Computer models of future climate and atmospheric conditions suggest the storm track will continue to move north and that precipitation will continue to decrease in the southwestern U.S.
The timing of the change from wet, cool winter weather to the warmer dry season is important for many ecological processes in the arid Southwest. Therefore, McAfee wanted to know how the shift in the storm track affected precipitation during the transition from winter to spring.
For the period 1978 to 1998, the researchers compared the month-to-month position of the winter storm track, temperature and precipitation records from the western U.S., and pressure at different levels in the atmosphere.
The team used a statistical method called Monte Carlo simulations to test whether the coincidence of storm track and weather patterns had occurred by chance.
Russell said the results of the simulation showed, "It's very rare that you get this distribution by chance." Therefore, she said, the changes in late winter precipitation in the West from 1978 to 1998 are related to the changes in the storm track path for that same time period.
McAfee said her next step is investigating whether western vegetation has changed as the storm track has changed.
Source: University of Arizona
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
Feb 09, 2012
-
where gems are found in the world
Feb 09, 2012
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
18 hours ago |
5 / 5 (7) |
8
|
NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists
US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
21 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
18
Two new moons for Jupiter
Advances in technology have lead to the discovery of new planets outside of our Solar System, and now even new moons in our own backyard.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
18 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
7
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
19 hours ago |
4.7 / 5 (6) |
3
|
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
New power source discovered
(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.
Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'
(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (13)
That is not possible because a computer model says so, and computer models know all! ALL I SAID!
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (12)
Man they're throwing grant money at anyone who wants to push the human based global warming agenda.
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (13)
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
Why are all the computer "models" for weather systems both calibrated and interpreted by CHICKEN LITTLE ???
STOP GIVING THESE CLIMATE PSYCHICS MONEY.
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
And agg it's; "psychotics" not "psychics"
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
He's right, we need to be as biased as possible so that all our so called "science" can be predetermined, that way we can sit back and watch the grant money roll in.
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
Let them rave on....
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (10)
As you all said, jet streams DO and ALWAYS WILL change. I am sick of this media hype!
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
1) Exactly HOW rare is this weather pattern?
2) How much energy is required to shift the westerly winds from where they were to where they are?
I suspect the answers to those questions are "Ummmmm...." and "More energy than humans produce in a year".
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (11)
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
*snicker*
Aug 19, 2008
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
But then, it is useless to arue with closed minds.
Aug 20, 2008
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Aug 20, 2008
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
WTF? Maybe irrelevant if you are God (as these dorks seem to think they are), but on EARTH where PEOPLE live, what PEOPLE believe is absolutely RELEVANT. If I bought what these wackos are selling, then I would vote for the most massive tax increase in history (aka "cap and trade"), but since I don't believe them, I will fight against the tax grab in order to keep my own money. Sounds pretty relevant to me... To the tune of trillions of dollars of our money.
Aug 21, 2008
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
The IPCC "Scientists" didn't prove anything. They did a (IMHO) limited review of published (and unpublished) papers. There are a large number of well documented problems with the IPCC:
1) Reviewing unpublished papers was a violation of their own rules.
2) Ignoring the responses (what few there were) of their reviewers was a violation of scientific ethics.
3) Writing their executive summaries prior to the production of the various chapters was out and out fraud since there was no way the authors were going to let those chapters contradict the summaries.
4) Averaging the output of multiple computer models, that don't produce identical results, and passing that off as proof of anything is a joke.
5) Allowing people with conflicts of interest to remain unidentified among the authors (as long as it was in a specific direction) is disingenuous.
6) Pretending that all of the reviewers looked at all of the report (instead of the low percentage that did) and that they all agreed is fraudulent.
The simple fact is the IPCC isn't a scientific body and never has been. IMHO, it's purely political and is being used to drive political changes.
Aug 21, 2008
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
You do realize that multiple astrophysicists have written papers about climate change stemming from the dramatic increase in solar energy over the past 70 years, but none of their papers are ever considered by climatologists based on the "LOL ASTROPHYSICS" attitude that climatologists have taken in regard to changes in ambient energy in the environment.
The climatic cycle and global warming perceived by climatologists match the exact increase in what physicists are seeing from solar energy output scales.
Summary: When the sun gets hotter, the Earth gets hotter. Proven by 3 things
1) Mean temperature increases recorded on Earth have increased at the same rate as recorded mean temperature increases on other planets in the solar system.
2) Human greenhouse gas (big misnomer) contribution totals less than 1/3 of a percent and never include calculations for water vapor (the real temperature change induction mechanism of the planet).
3) Solar energy output matches perceived climate change and has as been modeled back to pre-cambrian times.
It's pretty simple, when you remove the politics and theories and look at the hard data, articles like the above are intellectual mistreatment.