Review: Google Chrome lacks polish under the hood

September 3, 2008 By PETER SVENSSON , AP Technology Writer
Review: Google Chrome lacks polish under the hood (AP)

Enlarge

Google Chrome, Google Inc.'s new Web browser, is shown during a news conference at the company's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2008. Google Inc. is releasing Chrome in a long-anticipated move aimed at countering the dominance of Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer and ensuring easy access to its market-leading search engine. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

(AP) -- Google Inc.'s new Web browser, called Chrome, does much of what a browser needs to do these days: It presents a sleek appearance, groups pages into easy-to-manage "tabs" and offers several ways for people to control their Internet privacy settings.



Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

3.1 /5 (42 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Palli
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (7)
Running 40-50 instances of any browser looks risky to me, unless you share some resources such as the rendering engine amongst those windows like traditional browsers do. Chrome runs each page as a separate process which is more expensive on memory. Therefor I think it's unfair to compare browsers in this way.
Maybe you should consider organizing your work to perform better with fewer windows open at a time?

What I find interesting is that it seems Google is sneaking in an "operation platform/system" for their own future application developments. With Chroma they have a platform for Java applications that could rival "Windows only .net" applications and every desktop application that comes from Micro$oft.
This even put's less importance on operating systems as processes get more dependent on virtual platforms (Java/.net ect.) so Chroma could do BIG damage to Windows as well!

KMG
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (7)
I would like to respectfully disagree with everything in this article about IE 8 Beta 2. My horrifying experience with it is still on going. I am a certified Microsoft System Engineer and with over 15 years of IT experience I can honestly say it is the worst, slowest and buggiest product yet released by Microsoft.

I first installed it a week ago and after the install my computer rebooted. I launched IE 8 Beta 2 and it crashed.

I launched it again and it ran this time but when I open a new tab it crashes. This crashing continues to happen every time I click control T or open a new tab. I can crash IE with a single stroke of the keyboard!? When I browse to links that open a new windows or open a tab IE 8 it CRASHES. This leads me to believe it is the flakiest product yet release and should be shelved like Microsoft Bob.

I then tried to uninstall IE 8 beta 2 hoping to rid my computer of this infestation. Guess what. YOU CANNOT UNINSTALL IT!!! It is FOREVER on your machine!!! Microsoft claims that this is by design if you had IE 8 beta 1 installed. Guess what, I DID NOT. I had a clean install. Microsoft also claims that it warns you that if you install over IE 8 beta 1 you cannot uninstalled beta 2. Guess what, I never got this warning since I did not have beta 1 installed -- ever!

Here are my facts:
* IE 8 beta 2 takes a very long time to load initially sometimes over 1 minute
* Firefox/Chrome/Opera take a fraction of that
* Firefox/Chrome/Opera can load 4 times the number of pages in the time IE 8 Beta 2 takes to load 1 page (all the same pages)
* IE 8 Beta 2 CRASHES A LOT!!!
* IE 8 CANNOT BE UNINSTALLED!!!
* If you have issues with IE 8 like me you will regret ever installing it!!!

Lessons Learned:
Install Firefox, Opera or Chrome. DO NOT INSTALL IE 8 Beta 2!!!

Regards,
Kris G.
MCSE
seversky
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
This article sounds fishy.
DiabolicEdict
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (6)
"I often have 40 or 50 tabs open in Firefox"

I'm having a hard time believing that. This piece sounds more like a paid Microsoft advertisement to me.

Also, if you really wanted to test for accurate Javascript performance, stop using your wristwatch, try this http://wd-testnet...test.htm
10wattmindtrip
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I think this article is a bit too hard on Chrome. It was released yesterday, not 2 weeks ago, not 12 weeks ago, not a year ago.
This browser on it's first release has brought a lot of attention to people because of it's performance. It's 'open source' also. This means plugins will be added.
I don't know. Maybe I'm wrong. Somehow though, I think my coffee is agreeing with me. Weird.
Glis
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I think we're expecting a little much from Chrome. It's still a BETA. Plus, they are trying to do a lot of new stuff with it. It's going to be full of bugs for quite a while. Remember Win95 Beta?

As for the MCSE above... I've installed and run IE 8 BETA 2 with zero problems. Of course, I only use it for sites that don't work with Opera. =)
MGraser
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm not sure what this author is talking about. There is only one problem that they actually mention, which is the handling of Flash in relation to CPU resources. Good point.

At the same time they point out that:
1. Javascript is handled better, which is a major component of functionality for almost every webpage. BTW, CNET has a chart showing that Chrome's V8 internals blow away the competition.
2. Chrome sandboxes each tab, so that not only won't poorly written code crash your computer, but it won't crash your browser. It effectively isolates what's happening to that specific tab - a major improvement.
3. Chrome has the equivalent of a Task Manager for the browser, so that you know EXACTLY what is using your resources and you can end that process if you like.
4. It also allows you to use the browser "incognito" (their own term). Browser history, cookies, etc. are not recorded for that session. Yes, the ISPs can still track you, but it sure beats dropping your entire search history and cleaning up your browsing sessions after the fact.

Also, as the author points out, add-ons will come with time. Most people didn't even know there was going to be a browser until a couple days ago.

So, the author is put out about Flash. Guess what - they can make a suggestion to Google! I bet they'll want to fix that. Otherwise, the browser is stunning for a beta product. I've been using it for the past two days and have been very happy thus far.

MGraser
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
Forgot to post the link to the CNET article:
http://news.cnet....-92.html
madsp
Sep 03, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
I don't like that you say that Firefox(FF) has a less serious problem, because there exist 3rd party addons that enhance it and solve your problems. It doesn't seem like a very objective way to look at the two browsers.
Imagine that a new version of FF comes out and that your much loved addons aren't compatible with that new version. Then it would be the same if you said that your older version of FF was better, because it supported your addons, even though the newer version of FF was more secure/stable/whatever.
You can't blame a beta for "lacking polish under the hood", its what you would expect of a beta product in my opinion.
SnagaDuath
Sep 04, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I have to agree with madsp. I'm very impressed with what I've seen from Chrome so far. I'd concider switching from FF, if there was a beta version for Linux, simply because it's faster. What I would really like is for Mozilla to incorporate the parallel processing and sandboxing into FF, because I've also fallen in love with ubiquity.
It's going to be a tough choice for me between Chrome and FF once Chrome is no longer in beta.
wawadave
Sep 04, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
the author sure does sound like a shill for MS.

Wonder what his computer spects are hardware wise?

I found older computer have less resources and handle things less well.
Found this same with all programs that run on old hardware with less ram.
I,m sure ie on that machine really sucks up resources!

Former MS MVP

matelot
Sep 09, 2008

Rank: not rated yet
>> PETER SVENSSON:
>> At work, I often have 40 or 50 tabs open in Firefox
Only "40 or 50 tabs" ????!!!!
Jesus Christ, you must be the "busiest" Internet user on the planet....LOL
Rank 3.1 /5 (42 votes)
Tags

Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Calling function with no input argument
    created10 hours ago
  • Force free body diagram problem on gym equipment
    created10 hours ago
  • Empirical data regarding shower heads and water
    created18 hours ago
  • feed hold button on CNC lathe
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • RFAC in Fortran
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • dynamics 2/32
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Engineering

More news stories

Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets

Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.

Technology / Internet

created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)

The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.

Technology / Internet

created 4 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 10

New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission

Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. They’re a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel — such as an optical fiber o ...

Technology / Computer Sciences

created 12 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 5 | with audio podcast

New power source discovered

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created 11 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (19) | comments 7 | with audio podcast

Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'

(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created 12 hours ago | popularity 4.2 / 5 (10) | comments 20 | with audio podcast


Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins

Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...

Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...

NASA sees wide-eyed cyclone Jasmine

Cyclone Jasmine's eye has opened wider on NASA satellite imagery, as it moves through the Southern Pacific Ocean.

The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males

A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...

NASA sees Giovanna reach cyclone strength, threaten Madagascar

Tropical Storm 12S built up steam and became a cyclone on February 10, 2012 as NASA's Terra satellite passed overhead. Residents of east-central Madagascar should prepare for this cyclone to make landfall ...

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...