Bright ideas lighting up Grand Central Terminal
September 18, 2008 By Michael KofskyNew York's Grand Central Terminal may be a grand old National Historic Landmark, but thanks to some modern technology, it's becoming one the most energy efficient buildings in the city.
Content from McClatchy-Tribune Information Services expires 90 days after original publication date. For more information about McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, please visit www.mctdirect.com .
Similar stories from PHYSorg:
The greening of Willis Tower: Rooftop gardens part of plan to improve efficiency
Nov 06, 2009 |
4 / 5 (6) |
0
Germany, Mexico, US top smart energy list
Nov 05, 2009 |
2.5 / 5 (2) |
1
3-D system based on optical fiber could provide new options for photovoltaics
Nov 02, 2009 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
0
Obama unveils historic power grid reform
Oct 27, 2009 |
3.9 / 5 (14) |
1
INL, ISU team on nanoparticle production breakthrough
Oct 19, 2009 |
5 / 5 (14) |
1



Most LED-lights are still less efficient than flourescent lighting.
They're far more expensive, but they last a long time. Since LEDs are still rapidly improving and it makes no sense to be stuck with current technology for such a long time.
The FACT is that they consume less energy for the light they give off- which by definition means they are more efficient- I'm not making this stuff up...and they exist TODAY!
The US DoE is about to implement a drive towards LED lighting, because it would cut America's energy consumption, making it less dependent on foreign oil...this will further stimulate research and development and put us closer to the goal of "extremely efficient lighting systems".