Scientists explore what happened before the universe's theoretical beginning

September 22, 2008 By Robert S. Boyd

When the huge subatomic-particle smasher under the Swiss-French border starts running, it's supposed to reveal what happened the instant after the big bang, the theoretical beginning of our universe 13.7 billion years ago.



Content from McClatchy-Tribune Information Services expires 90 days after original publication date. For more information about McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, please visit www.mctdirect.com .

Similar stories from PHYSorg:


A Tale of Planetary Woe (w/ Video)

created 10 hours ago | popularity 4.7 / 5 (7) | comments 1

Exoplanets Clue to Sun's Curious Chemistry

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.9 / 5 (14) | comments 11

NASA on crusade to debunk 2012 apocalypse myths

created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (7) | comments 4

Peckish bird briefly downs big atom smasher

created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity 4 / 5 (11) | comments 17

W. Africa's last giraffes make surprising comeback

created Nov 08, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.3 /5 (39 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • E_L_Earnhardt - Sep 22, 2008
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
    "And Who lit the fuse - on what?"
  • Alizee - Sep 22, 2008
    • Rank: 2.2 / 5 (5)
    If the universe appears like giant black hole (as the AWT is assuming), it should evolve and undulate like giant quantum wave packet.

    http://superstrun...wave.gif

    After then, it may not be so easy to distinguish between periodic and nonperiodic models of Universe history, because both periodic, both aperiodic behavior is possible here, as follows from quantum wave animation.
  • Amy_Steri - Sep 22, 2008
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
    "Even if the universe, or multiverse, were around forever, this would not challenge the theological explanation of the world's existence," Haught said.

    Wow...faith is armor to withstand any assault of reason.
  • Modernmystic - Sep 23, 2008
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
    "Even if the universe, or multiverse, were around forever, this would not challenge the theological explanation of the world's existence," Haught said.

    Wow...faith is armor to withstand any assault of reason.


    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.
  • drel - Sep 23, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)

    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.



    Modernmystic,
    First you stated "If all possibilities are bourne out..." - If that is correct then in at least one of them there is NOT a god.

    Thereby your statment "...(and hence by definition all)..." is False
  • FunToThink - Sep 24, 2008
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.


    You cannot make any specific prediction about an individual universe that is one of an infinite number. You cannot say that since there are an infinite number of universes, one of them must have a god, or unicorns, or a person exactly like yourself but with a different favorite flavor of ice cream. Here's a simple example why. Suppose you have an infinite list of numbers. You cannot say that one of them must be the number 32.5 if it turns out that the infinite list ends up just having odd integers in it.
  • Modernmystic - Sep 24, 2008
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (1)

    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.



    Modernmystic,
    First you stated "If all possibilities are bourne out..." - If that is correct then in at least one of them there is NOT a god.

    Thereby your statment [sic] "...(and hence by definition all)..." is False


    Therein lies the rub, God by definition is omnipresent...he's everywhere. IOW it only takes one universe for him to exist in to exist in all of them.

    Again, this is only if you buy into the infinite universes/parallel universes stuff. Personally I don't.
  • Max_Resonance - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "And Who lit the fuse - on what?"


    "Who wants to know?" (quoting the Indian mystic Balsekar's reply to the famous "Who am I?" query.
  • x646d63 - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    "Even if the universe, or multiverse, were around forever, this would not challenge the theological explanation of the world's existence," Haught said.

    Wow...faith is armor to withstand any assault of reason.


    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.


    You have to assume that God is a possibility for this to be true. I say "God" is not possible, therefore he does not exist in any universe.
  • Modernmystic - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    "Even if the universe, or multiverse, were around forever, this would not challenge the theological explanation of the world's existence," Haught said.

    Wow...faith is armor to withstand any assault of reason.


    So is science apparently. If there are infinite universes that have "been around forever" then it's a certainty that in one (and hence by definition all) of them there is a God. If all possibilities are bourne out then it's a given.


    You have to assume that God is a possibility for this to be true. I say "God" is not possible, therefore he does not exist in any universe.


    Spoken like a true believer. A creationist couldn't be more closed minded :)
  • frajo - Sep 27, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    The one criterion to tell science from non-science is falsifiability.
    Therefore neither religion nor "multiverses" are scientific subjects.
    Believe whatever you want - but don't pretend to be scientific about it.
  • x646d63 - Sep 29, 2008
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)

    You have to assume that God is a possibility for this to be true. I say "God" is not possible, therefore he does not exist in any universe.


    Spoken like a true believer. A creationist couldn't be more closed minded :)


    Do you understand logic? If infinite universes give rise to all possibilities, then all possibilities will exist. However, if "God" is not a possibility then it will not exist. Saying God can exist doesn't make it possible--even in infinite universes.

    Give me a logical argument for the existence of any god (omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent) then I'll consider it with an open mind.
  • Modernmystic - Sep 29, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Do you understand what infinite means?

    If really did then you'd know I don't have to give you a "logical argument for the existence of God".
  • x646d63 - Sep 30, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I'm talking about possibilities, you are not.

    A universe that contains both an immovable object and irresistible force cannot possibly exist. The two exist only with mutual exclusivity.

    Infinite universes will give way to infinite possibilities, but it will not give way to a single non-possibility.

    So provide me a description of a God that is not both an immovable object and irresistible force and I'll listen.
  • Modernmystic - Sep 30, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I'm not going to "argue" with you for the same reasons I don't argue with creationists anymore...there's no point.

    However a universe can contain an immovable object and an irresistible force...as long as the two never meet (say through runaway expansion or some other mechanism). There are more things in heaven and earth that are dreamed of in your smallish philosophy good sir.
  • x646d63 - Oct 01, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I won't waste any more of your valuable time, either. Since you believe an immovable object can be movable there is absolutely no sense having any discussion about it.
  • Velanarris - Oct 04, 2008
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    I won't waste any more of your valuable time, either. Since you believe an immovable object can be movable there is absolutely no sense having any discussion about it.


    And for reference an immovable object and an unresistable force can exist in a universe and meet. They just cannot act upon each other.

    Let's say non baryonic matter and gravity both exist in the universe. And that non baryonic matter cannot be acted upon by gravity.

    Through what manner of interaction would the two be mutually exclusive if there is an impossibility for interaction?
  • sarkaflias - Oct 06, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I wonder how the author considers that the religius myths could be relevant with modern cosmology and does not make a single reference to the ancient greek scientific theories. Especially why the author ignores the greek philosophers like Lefkipous, Democritous, Epicurus, Metrodorus who developed the most logic, rational, materialistic, monistic, scientific, mechanical theory THE ATOMIC THEORY. A theory without metaphysical entities or gods or satans or anything like that, a theory which also validated by modern science and cosmology.
    Do i need to refer Carl Sagan and what he says in the series COSMOS about Democritous?
    I just want to point in this movie http://www.caid.g...tus.html
    presented in INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE FILM FESTIVAL
    But is not only that: The truth is that religions destroyed science and scientists. Apostole Saoul himself in Acts 9:19 burns thousants of scientific books in Ephesus. Also religions burnt more than 1 million papyri in Library of Alexandreia.
    Religion has nothing to do with science, they are two different, opposite and discrete things.
  • x646d63 - Oct 07, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Through what manner of interaction would the two be mutually exclusive if there is an impossibility for interaction?


    Really? What manner of interaction would there be if there was no interaction?

    My point is that if something is defined as existing mutually exclusive of something else, then the two in combination is impossible. So, not everything you can dream up is possible--not even in infinite universes.

  • s0cratus - Jan 01, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Do you understand what infinite means?
    / Modernmystic /
    ==================
    Does infinity have any physical parameters?

    The Universe is Infinite Vacuum in the state of T=0K,
    at first of everything. Why? Because it is visual fact.
    #
    The Universe as whole is Kingdom of Coldness.
    Now the physicists think that this Kingdom of Coldness
    in a state of T=2,7K ( after big bang). If somebody belief in
    %u201C big bang%u201D, he must take in calculation that T=2,7K expands
    and therefore T=2,7K is temporary parameter and with time
    it will go to T=0K.
    #
    Last August ( 2007), ground and satellite observations revealed
    what appeared to be an enormous "hole in the universe,"
    a mostly empty region of the sky, 900 million light-years
    wide - about 5 billion trillion miles -%u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026
    Where are the gravitational waves here ?
    The gravity is zero.
    If in the Universe astronomers found enormous spaces without
    Any material mass or energy it means these spaces in state T=0K.
    #
    Only mass and energy can warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
    But the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
    (the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
    p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot %u201C close %u201C the Universe and therefore
    the Universe is %u201C open%u201D, endless and this small mass can warm up the
    Kingdom of Coldness only in it some limited and local points.
    Therefore astrophysicists search for %u201C dark matter%u201D because it will save
    the %u201C law of gravitation %u201C as a first law of the Universe and it will
    warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
    #
    The cosmological constant of Universe is zero or near to it.
    This physical quantity cannot %u201C close%u201D the Universe therefore
    the Universe is endless.
    http://en.wikiped...constant
    #
    Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective
    Authors: Matt Visser (Washington University in Saint Louis)
    (Submitted on 19 Apr 2002)
    Abstract: Sakharov's 1967 notion of ``induced gravity'' is currently
    enjoying a significant resurgence. The basic idea, originally presented
    in a very brief 3-page paper with a total of 4 formulas, is that gravit
    is not ``fundamental'' in the sense of particle physics. Instead it was
    argued that gravity (general relativity) emerges from quantum field
    theory in roughly the same sense that hydrodynamics or continuum
    elasticity theory emerges from molecular physics. In this article I will
    translate the key ideas into modern language, and explain the various
    versions of Sakharov's idea currently on the market.

    Sakharov's induced gravity: a modern perspective
    --Matt Visser
    http://arxiv.org/.../0204062
    #
    When the next revolution rocks physics,
    chances are it will be about nothing%u2014the vacuum, that endless
    infinite void.
    http://discoverma...erything

    ========================..

    http://discoverma...cs/space
    ============================== . .
    ==========..
    Best wishes.
    Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
    http://www.socratus.com
    http://www.wbabin.net
    http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
    http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf

September 22, 2008 all stories

Comments: 20

4.3 /5 (39 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • What computer science can teach economics
    created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Rapid supernova could be new class of exploding star
    created Nov 05, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Stars Fueled by Dark Matter Could Hold Secrets to the Universe
    created Nov 03, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Precise picture of early Universe supports 'dark matter' theory
    created Nov 02, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Dark matter sleuths to design world's largest WIMP catcher
    created Oct 29, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Rocks
    created 4 hours ago
  • Fractal Nature of Gravitational Forces
    created 5 hours ago
  • A basic question about vectors
    created 6 hours ago
  • Self Reference and Physics
    created 6 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

The LHC tunnel

Peckish bird briefly downs big atom smasher

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity 4 / 5 (11) | comments 17

A peckish bird briefly knocked out part of the world's biggest atom smasher by causing a chain reaction with a piece of bread, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) said Monday.


First Bose-Einstein condensation of strontium

First Bose-Einstein condensation of strontium

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (7) | comments 4

In an international first, scientists from the Institute of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI, Austria) produced a Bose-Einstein condensate of the alkaline-earth element strontium, thus narrowly ...


Quantum gas microscope offers glimpse of quirky ultracold atoms

Quantum gas microscope offers glimpse of quirky ultracold atoms

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Nov 04, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (19) | comments 4

(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicists at Harvard University have created a quantum gas microscope that can be used to observe single atoms at temperatures so low the particles follow the rules of quantum mechanics, ...


Solving big problems

Solving big problems with new quantum algorithm

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Nov 09, 2009 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (28) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- In a recently published paper, Aram Harrow at the University of Bristol and colleagues from MIT in the United States have discovered a quantum algorithm that solves large problems much faster ...


Tiny Music Player Made from Wire Bridge

Tiny Music Player Made from Wire Bridge (w/ Video)

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 04, 2009 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (15) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- In 2008, scientists built a loudspeaker made of carbon nanotubes that produced sound and music based on the thermoacoustic effect. Now, a different team of scientists has built a loudspeaker ...