Engineer: Head-first slide is quicker

September 26th, 2008

Base running and base stealing would seem to be arts driven solely by a runner's speed, but there's more than mere gristle, bone and lung power to this facet of baseball -- there are lots of mathematics and physics at play.

With baseball playoffs heating up and the World Series right around the corner, it's guaranteed that fans will see daring slides, both feet-first and head -first, and even slides on bang-bang plays at first.

Who gets there faster, the head-first slider or the feet-first?

The heads first player, says David A. Peters, Ph.D., the McDonnell Douglas Professor of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis, and big-time baseball fan. He says it's a matter of the player's center of gravity.

Peters is a mechanical engineer who specializes in aircraft and helicopter engineering, and he sees our "fields of dreams" a bit differently than most – he sees them as playgrounds of math and physics.

Peters says that dynamics equations can determine which slide gets you there more quickly. But there are three important mathematical issues at play.

"There's momentum – mass of the body times how fast the player is moving," he says. "There's angular momentum. If it's feet-first and you're starting to slide, your feet are going out from you and you're rotating clockwise; if it's head-first, as your hands go down, you're rotating counterclockwise."

Angular momentum is mass movement of inertia times the rotational rate.

"On top of this is Newton's Law," Peters explains. "The force is your mass times acceleration. The moments are moments of inertia times your angular acceleration."

So, who gets there faster?

"It turns out your center of gravity is where the momentum is," Peters says. "This is found half way from the tips of your fingers to the tips of your toes. In the headfirst slide, the center of gravity is lower than halfway between your feet and hands, so your feet don't get there as fast. It's faster head-first."

For a long time – until roughly the Pete Rose era of the '60s and '70s – players shunned the headfirst slide to protect their hands and faces. Spikes, evoking the Ty Cobb days, were weapons on the diamond. In the past few decades, players who prefer the head-first slide have taken to running holding onto their batter's gloves to prevent their hands from opening up and being exposed to injury. And, while the percentage of players who slide one way or the other is not actually known, Peters estimates it's about 50-50.

Peters notes a growing number of players who will slide into first base, despite conventional wisdom that running through first is the faster way.

"Mathematically, you might think there's an advantage, but leaving your feet is actually a detriment because you're no longer pulsing and you start to decelerate," he says. "When you're running, your get your feet out in front of the center of gravity, so you're getting maybe three or four steps of an advantage."

Peters says the only advantage of any slide into first base is to avoid the first baseman's tag when he has to come off the base to spear an errant throw.

"In general, most agree to run through first, but you'll find people who will swear it's better to do it the other way."

Video: Dave Peters discusses the physics of sliding and compares sliding head first versus feet first. -- mms://mediaserver.wustl.edu/mpa/sliding/large.wmv

Source: Washington University in St. Louis


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Digg this Stumble it share on Facebook share on Reddit add to delicious save to Yahoo! bookmarks
3.7/5 after 14 votes

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • x646d63 - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Runners who hold their batting gloves do so to prevent from putting their hand down behind them when they slide feet first. This is to prevent jamming or breaking their wrist. Nobody who slides head-first carries gloves because you need your fingers to help you stop on the bag.

    Obviously head-first is faster than feet first simply because you have to fight gravity to get your feet out in front of you, but you work with gravity to get your top out in front of you.

    But nobody cares whether feet-first or head-first is faster (since we already knew the answer.) The only real debate has been whether sliding head-first into first base is faster than running through the bag (although we know the answer to that, too.)
  • earls - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "players shunned the headfirst slide to protect their hands and faces."

    Says it all to me, forget the whole plus or minus a second in terms of speed. I know when I was in little league I didn't like to slide into the bases at all... Even if you managed not to get hit by a thrown ball or stepped on, our infield was dirt and ROCKS. :(
  • MGraser - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Plus, there's jammed fingers, which is also a huge danger. They are purposefully taught to go feet first for protection, even though hands first gets you that extra edge. Sometimes in the spirit of the game, they throw caution to the wind, but you've got to protect your players.
  • thales - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Sounds like your typical risk/reward decision.
  • tgoldman - Sep 26, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "...If it's feet-first and you're starting to slide, your feet are going out from you and you're rotating clockwise; if it's head-first, as your hands go down, you're rotating counterclockwise." --- not from dugout view!

    "...your center of gravity is where the momentum is ... This is found half way from the tips of your fingers to the tips of your toes" --- so your c.o.g. is below your knees? This is so garbled (by reporter or engineer?), it is absolutely worthless.
  • Slamshift - Sep 29, 2008
    • Rank: not rated yet
    The head-first slide may be faster, but that sudden stop should your head come in contact with something immobile is a real bitch.

September 26th, 2008 all stories
Other Sciences / Mathematics

Comments: 6
Rank: 3.7/5 after 14 votes

  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • Share it:
  • share on Facebook
  • share on MySpace
  • share on Slashdot
  • rss-newsfeed
  • share on Google
  • share on Reddit
  • add to delicious
  • save to Yahoo! bookmarks
  • share on Windows Live
  • Add to Mixx!
Rating: 3.7/5 after 14 votes

  • Related Stories

  • Scientists: Silent tremors may foretell next Big One
    created 1hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Motorola Get Ahead Of The Social Curve With Karma
    created Jun 23, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Palm Pre: It's almost an iPhone
    created Jun 18, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • X-Rays for Early Alzheimer's Disease Detection
    created Jun 15, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • US video game sales slide 23 pct in May
    created Jun 12, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


  • Physicists Demonstrate Quantum Memory with Matter Qubits
    Physicists Demonstrate Quantum Memory with Matter Qubits
    Physics / General Physics
    created Jul 03, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (17) | comments 1
  • 'Holey' Nanosheets for Wastewater Dye Removal
    Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials
    created Jul 01, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 1
  • Jellyfish Robot Swims Like its Biological Counterpart
    Jellyfish Robot Swims Like its Biological Counterpart
    Electronics / Robotics
    created Jun 26, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (8) | comments 1
  • Could Maxwell's Demon Exist in Nanoscale Systems?
    Could Maxwell's Demon Exist in Nanoscale Systems?
    Physics / General Physics
    created Jun 24, 2009 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (18) | comments 29
  • Living Safely with Robots, Beyond Asimov's Laws
    Living Safely with Robots, Beyond Asimov's Laws
    Electronics / Robotics
    created Jun 22, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (53) | comments 40
  • Other News

    Creation Museum president Ken A. Ham

    Paleontologists brought to tears, laughter by Creation Museum

    Other Sciences / Other

    created Jun 30, 2009 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (44) | comments 125

    For a group of paleontologists, a tour of the Creation Museum seemed like a great tongue-in-cheek way to cap off a serious conference.


    Mummified dinosaur skin yields up new secrets

    Mummified dinosaur skin yields up new secrets

    Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

    created Jul 01, 2009 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (15) | comments 10

    (PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists from The University of Manchester have identified preserved organic molecules in the skin of a dinosaur that died around 66-million years ago.


    Liberal? Conservative? Stanford study says mental nudge can make voters flip-flop

    Liberal? Conservative? Stanford study says mental nudge can make voters flip-flop

    Other Sciences / Social Sciences

    created Jul 02, 2009 | popularity 3.8 / 5 (6) | comments 4

    (PhysOrg.com) -- No doubt you’ve worked hard for your success. But chances are you’ve also had some help and lucky breaks along the way.


    Probing Question: How do Ponzi Schemes work?

    Other Sciences / Economics

    created Jul 02, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2

    Imagine the shock, the horror, and the sheer panic that would come with learning that the financial plan you’d sunk your life savings into was a sham, the financial experts you trusted were crooks, and all your money was ...


    Tourists enjoy a "Pineapple Tour" in Costa Rica

    Costa Rica tops happiness, 'green living' poll

    Other Sciences / Social Sciences

    created Jul 04, 2009 | popularity 3.5 / 5 (4) | comments 0

    Costa Rica is the happiest place on earth, and one of the most environmentally friendly, according to a new survey by a British non-governmental group.