Toolbox
Share on facebook Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Slashdot it Save to Windows live Save to MySpace science news feed Add to google
- size +

Questionable degrees raise doubts on Navy surgeon general's vetting

By Russell Working, General Science / Other
When Vice Adm. Donald Arthur retired as Navy surgeon general, Adm. Mike Mullen - now chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - paid tribute to a "Renaissance man." "His resume says a lot," Mullen said. "B.A., M.A., J.D., Ph.D. and of course M.D. He's got more degrees than a thermometer."
It was a stirring testimonial, but not entirely accurate. While Arthur's bachelor's and M.D. were legitimate, he has no master's. The Ph.D. came from a university whose accreditation the federal government doesn't recognize. And the J.D., or law degree, was granted by a diploma mill that collapsed after its president was imprisoned for fraud.

Nearly two years before Mullen's rousing send-off, an author specializing in military research told his office that Arthur had claimed questionable academic credentials.

Yet Mullen still made those degrees a centerpiece of his retirement ode to Arthur last year. And those degrees were either entered into Arthur's record or listed in resumes submitted to the U.S. Senate for his promotion up the ranks of admiral and ultimately to surgeon general of the Navy, records show.

Arthur says he was guilty only of being ill-informed about unaccredited institutions - and that a Navy investigation cleared him of any wrongdoing.

But his history raises questions about how well Pentagon brass and the Senate vet applicants to top military positions as the federal government investigates cases of academic fraud.

Arthur, who left the Navy and became a hospital executive in Pennsylvania, defended his qualifications to be the service's top doctor. "The only thing I was hired to be surgeon general for was my M.D.," he said.

His Ph.D. and J.D. have since been removed from his official biography but remain in his service record.

An unaccredited J.D. and Ph.D. would not be as central to a doctor's promotion as an M.D., said retired Rear Adm. John Hutson, the Navy's top uniformed lawyer from 1997 to 2000. But Hutson said the law degree and doctorate would have been factors in Arthur's advancement - particularly in an area like health-care management, the focus of his Ph.D..

"He may or may not be promoted without it," Hutson said. "But one, he had it in his record, and two, there's a pretty good argument that he knew or should have known that people would rely on it, not knowing that they were unaccredited degrees."

Unaccredited institutions range from those whose officials have been prosecuted, like LaSalle University in Mandeville, La., to those like American Century University (formerly Century University) that operate legally but claim accreditation from organizations the U.S. government doesn't recognize.

Within a 14-month period in 1992-93, Arthur obtained a Ph.D. in health-care management from what is now American Century University in New Mexico and a J.D. from LaSalle University, according to his Navy record.

American Century's dean of instruction, Antonin Smrcka, said students work hard for degrees, adding that the institution had Arthur's doctoral thesis on file before it was destroyed as part of a regular records purge.

But he added: "The U.S. Army or U.S. Navy or U.S. Air Force does not recognize the degree from Century University. ... As a rule, we inform the potential student to speak to his employer (to find out) if his employer would accept the degree."

LaSalle University is not to be confused with venerable La Salle University in Philadelphia. The LaSalle in Louisiana collapsed after its founder pleaded guilty in 1996 to conspiracy to commit tax evasion and other offenses in a scheme that included the selling of degrees.

In interviews, Arthur acknowledged that in the early 1990s he took "some courses from two places that are unaccredited." He said LaSalle had given him papers indicating the school had been accredited. "I could say I was naive, but I was 40 years old. And I didn't understand completely what was going on."

As for the master's, which first appeared in his bio for his 1978 medical school yearbook, Arthur said, "I was in a master's program, but I did not graduate. I do not have a master's degree."

Arthur has come under criticism from a number of retired Navy officers, including Dr. Benjamin Newman, a veteran of the Navy medical corps who retired this year.

Newman noted that the Navy's Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, which Arthur oversaw as surgeon general, scrutinizes a doctor's record every time he is assigned to practice medicine at a new duty station.

Arthur's "credentials should have been picked up by someone to show that they're not legitimate," said Newman, who has viewed Arthur's records.

In November 2005, B.G. Burkett, an Army Vietnam veteran who has made a career of exposing military fraud, urged Mullen to investigate Arthur, according to letters provided by Burkett.

Arthur said he was stunned by Burkett's allegations at the time and welcomed an investigation by the Navy inspector general. Arthur said the investigation cleared him of any wrongdoing, but he declined to give the Tribune a copy of the report.

The inspector general's office declined to confirm that any investigation occurred, citing confidentiality.

Asked how unaccredited degrees ended up in Arthur's record, Navy spokesman Cmdr. Jeff Davis said, "I have not seen the record. ... Navy policy and the Navy practice is that we don't introduce degrees that are not from accredited institutions."

___

(Chicago Tribune researcher Lelia Boyd Arnheim contributed to this report.)

___

© 2008, Chicago Tribune.
Visit the Chicago Tribune on the Internet at http://www.chicagotribune.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
» Next Article in General Science - Other: Researchers Turning Freshwater Farm Ponds into Crab Farms

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

3.8 out of 5 after 12 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by Modernmystic 10/01/08 09:00
Rank: 5/5 after 3 votes
Zero science 100% politics. Let's stick to the former please boys.
Posted by COCO 10/02/08 11:00
Rank: 2.3/5 after 3 votes
agreed - no need to embrass a war criminal here
Posted by Deo 10/07/08 18:25
Rank: 1/5 after 1 vote
This article isn't factual. Although the " PhD came from a university whose accreditation the federal government doesn't recognize. And the JD, or law degree, was granted by a diploma mill that collapsed after its president was imprisoned for fraud" does not mean Vice Admiral Arthur did not receive a quality education or complete course work required to obtain the degree. There are a variety of reasons why an agency is unrecognized, some agencies may be working towards recognition with the Secretary or CHEA and others may not meet the criteria for recognition. Accreditation of degree-granting institutions in the United States is a voluntary process. Diploma mills frequently use names similar to those used by accredited schools, which often allows the diploma mills to be mistaken for accredited schools. For example, Hamilton University of Evanston, Wyoming, which is not accredited by an accrediting body recognized by ED, has a name similar to Hamilton College, a fully accredited school in Clinton, New York. There are no uniform verification practices throughout the government whereby agencies can obtain information and conduct effective queries on schools and their accreditation status.
A recent study conducted by a recognized agency identified 463 students employed by the federal government who received degrees from unaccredited organizations. Two of the four schools provided records that federal agencies paid them $150,387.80 for the fees of federal employee students. Many service members have obtained such degrees and their resume is not under the microscope. I doubt very seriously the Board selected Vice Admiral Arthur for promotion soley on the fact that documentation within his service record listed the degrees in question. He was as an commissioned officer based on his medical degree and credntials he holds as a physician.
The federal government hasn't taken a stand on this issue and doesn't requires one to hold a degree from an accredited school AND hasn't established policies and procedures to ensure employees and service members do not list degrees obtained from unaccredited institutions. Until they do leave these folks alone-they attended the school, completed the required course work and paid the fees associated with the degree-why shouldn't they be allowed to display the degree on their wall or list it on their resume?
Posted by Deo 10/07/08 19:42
Rank: 1/5 after 1 vote
When medical officers (i,e NC, MSC, MC) are recruited into the navy, they must posses an accredited degree therefore, if they are going to have a degree added to their official record, it should be accredited.
Saying that his MD alone got him promoted is absurd. Did the promotion board idecide to just ignore the other two degrees? Yes, his MD alone would have gotten him promoted to a certain level, but those other degrees helped. At some point, we need to stop making excuses and covering up dishonesty as if such behavior cannot come from a senior ranking officer. The problem I have is that if this was an enlisted sailor s/he would have been out of a job by now.
No one disputes that individuals don't work hard for these degrees, but the bottom line is that non-accredited degrees should not be part of one's official record since these degrees will be taken into consideration at promotion boards. If any old degree will do, then it also be acceptable for a commission into the navy. God help us if it comes to that.

http://www.topix....72E1DOHL

Posted by Deo 10/09/08 07:51
Rank: 1/5 after 1 vote
Don Arthur would have summarily fired subordinates who were guilty of similar inattention to detail and/or less-than-truthful embellishments in official records. His well-deserved reputation was one of doing whatever was necessary to achieve the next rank. The accomplishments noted in his original bio (all the degrees, his training in emergency medicine, etc) represented boxes to be checked to facilitate his climb up the ladder. I am certain there are more than a few officers whose careers he has derailed that are enjoying a bit of perverse pleasure out of his current predicament. This story is just the tip of a very large and ugly iceberg.

-----Original Message-----

Infidelity. Dereliction of Duty. Conduct unbecoming of an officer. These are just a few allegations that have been circulating for years. But there is honor amongst thieves after all which might explain why nothing has been done about it. Just look at the current mess in the financial services industry? The so called "Master's of the Universe" have lead us all to the brink. Doesn't take a PhD to figure that out. Maybe that is what is wrong with this country, no accountability. Highly educated psychotic narcissists all.

-----Original Message-----

The iceberg is there. In 2000 I was ordered not to testify on behalf of Dr. Eric Gluck at a peer-review hearing in Groton, and brought the matter to the attention of then-Captain Arthur in December, 2000. My testimony to the DOD IG in this matter was given under oath on 10 June 2005 in the presence of Ralph M. Bard M.D., J.D., Commander USNR (former nuclear officer). Subsequent attempts to bring this case of intentional administrative abuse to light in order to right the wrongs (wrong rank, mail fraud, whistleblower reprisal regarding navy patient safety at Groton under Captain John Burkhart and at Backus Hospital (Norwich), nepotism, defrauding the government by moonlighting on duty time, etc.) were thwarted. In my opinion this is a modern Dreyfus Case, not so much because of anti-Semitism but because Dr. Gluck gave the World's Finest Navy full value, making no attempt to cut corners for personal gain. Admiral Arthur is now working at Main Line Health in Bryn Mawr,'Ponsylvania.' Did he lie to the Senate when presenting his credentials for promotion to ever-higher rank, is lying legal, or is he a credit to us all?
Why did he drop two of his degrees from his official bio (for the accuracy of which he is responsible) as he rose in rank? Why, indeed? I will be happy to testify under oath in these matters. H.E. Butler III M.D. CDR, USNR (Ret.)HButler@post.Harvard.edu

-----Original Message-----

http://www.topix....72E1DOHL