Strippers, armadillos inspire Ig Nobel winners

October 3rd, 2008 By MARK PRATT , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- Deborah Anderson had heard the urban legends about the contraceptive effectiveness of Coca-Cola products for years. So she and her colleagues decided to put the soft drink to the test. In the lab, that is.

---

Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

---

Similar stories from PHYSorg:

In Brief: Pepsi and Coke contain pesticides

Aug 02, 2006 | 4.7 / 5 (35) | 0

Caffeine experts call for warning labels for energy drinks

Sep 24, 2008 | 3.7 / 5 (40) | 8

Excessive cola consumption can lead to super-sized muscle problems warn doctors

May 19, 2009 | 4.7 / 5 (23) | 7

High pesticide levels found in fruit-based drinks in some countries outside U. S.

Dec 15, 2008 | 4 / 5 (5) | 2

Reducing kids' salt intake may lower soft drink consumption

Feb 20, 2008 | 4.5 / 5 (2) | 0

• D666 - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: not rated yet
  • rate
  I'd like to know *why* the dancers make more money. Do they smell different? Dance more agressively? Have more curves? Threaten their customers with knives?
  
  • flag
• Decaf - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  I'd guess at peak fertility they would tend to be mentally more interested in what they're doing. The less fake the act appears, the more money they're likely to earn.
  • flag
• KB6 - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: not rated yet
  • rate
  If the strippers know about the phenomenon that alone could change there behavior and affect their earnings too.
  
  "Duke University behavioral economist Dan Ariely won an Ig Nobel for his study that found more expensive fake medicines work better than cheaper fake medicines."
  ---
  This reminds me of a study that showed that red placebo pills are more effective than blue ones.
  
  • flag
• KB6 - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  Oops, that's "their", not "there".
  
  The armadillo study has real merit. The level at which artifacts are found can have a profound effect on the interpretation. Apparently, burrowing animals could really screw that up.
  • flag
• Linktothepast - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  "I'd like to know *why* the dancers make more money. Do they smell different? Dance more agressively? Have more curves? Threaten their customers with knives?"
  
  I guess it has something to do with the smell...
  
  No that i know anything about it..., cough, no....
  • flag
• TJ_alberta - Oct 03, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: not rated yet
  • rate
  D666 - my guess is you are correct about the pheromones. Now there is a proposition that can be tested.
  • flag
• D666 - Oct 08, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: not rated yet
  • rate

  D666 - my guess is you are correct about the pheromones. Now there is a proposition that can be tested.

  
  
  I hereby volunteer to help with the testing.
  
  
  • flag