Rating: 4.8
Bookmark
Save as PDF
Print
Email
Blog It
Stumble It!
Digg It
Researchers Moving Closer to Creating Viable Energy From Sewage
(PhysOrg.com) -- When a newly developed technology for producing hydrogen gas from biowaste is brought to commercial use – as researchers believe it can be – then it appears the world will have plenty of energy if it can just solve the stubborn shortage of sewage.
A new approach has been developed to use several types of biowaste, including ordinary municipal sewage, to produce hydrogen at a much lower cost than the traditional “electrolysis” technology, and make it more viable for use in the hydrogen fuel cells that many believe will power automobiles of the future.
The findings have just been reported in Water Research, a professional journal, by researchers in the College of Engineering at Oregon State University.
Studies suggest that this approach could reduce the amount of energy needed to produce hydrogen by as much as 75 percent, compared with hydrogen production by water electrolysis. More work needs to be done to reduce the cost for electrode materials and more advances in efficiency are possible, experts say.
"In the laboratory we're already quite close to the Department of Energy hydrogen cost goal of $2 to $3 per gasoline gallon equivalent, or GGE," said Hong Liu, an OSU assistant professor of biological and ecological engineering. "And with some additional research it should be possible to scale these systems up to levels needed for commercial use."
But that's not even the best news, Liu said.
While it's producing significant amounts of hydrogen from sewage, this system also cleans the water. Conceptually, treatment plants could be developed that take in sewage on one end and send clean water and hydrogen fuel out the other. Their production potential may only be limited by the amount of raw waste they have available – and sewage in the future may no longer be a waste disposal problem but rather a valued commodity, another important component of the nation's sustainable energy equation.
Other forms of biowaste could also be used, scientists say. The use of woody biomass is possible. The large amounts of waste from food processing factories would be a good candidate, as well as agricultural waste such as the huge amounts of manure produced in cattle, hog, and other livestock operations. In that context, it may be quite possible to make a silk purse out of a sow's rear.
All of this was achieved through fundamental research on "microbial electrolysis cells," or MECs, that use a new "membrane free" approach that costs less and is significantly more efficient than existing approaches.
"The removal of membrane not only can simplify the construction, operation and maintenance of MECs, but it also can decrease the internal resistance, thus increase the hydrogen production rate," the researchers said in their report.
In these systems, naturally occurring microorganisms from sewage attach to the surface of an anode and degrade the waste in the sewage, in a device that is something like a battery. The waste decomposes, eventually leaving protons that migrate to the cathode, combine with electrons and generate hydrogen.
These systems can be adapted to generate electricity directly or used to produce hydrogen, which in turn can be used to produce electricity from hydrogen fuel cells – an existing and widely proven technology.
"Hydrogen has often been thought of as the ideal fuel to run fuel-cell powered automobiles," Liu said. "Hydrogen fuel cells are about 60 percent efficient, roughly double that of a gasoline internal combustion engine. And there is no air pollution; the only byproduct from operation of the fuel cell is water."
One of the biggest steps still needed to make this type of fuel cell vehicle a reality is solving hydrogen production issues – and the new technology developed in Liu's laboratory might produce hydrogen at a cost close to the DOE goal. Those cost figures do not include the potential savings of billions of dollars spent in treating the nation's wastewater, which further increase the economical viability of the technology.
"Another interesting application of this approach might be in developing countries or remote areas," Liu said. "Often these places have few or no waste treatment plants, and no practical way in a remote location to produce electricity. Small systems used there might solve both problems.
"There's no doubt this could help contribute to a more sustainable future," Liu said. "We could clean up our sewage and produce fuel at the same time. That's very promising."
Provided by Oregon State University
Studies suggest that this approach could reduce the amount of energy needed to produce hydrogen by as much as 75 percent, compared with hydrogen production by water electrolysis. More work needs to be done to reduce the cost for electrode materials and more advances in efficiency are possible, experts say.
"In the laboratory we're already quite close to the Department of Energy hydrogen cost goal of $2 to $3 per gasoline gallon equivalent, or GGE," said Hong Liu, an OSU assistant professor of biological and ecological engineering. "And with some additional research it should be possible to scale these systems up to levels needed for commercial use."
But that's not even the best news, Liu said.
While it's producing significant amounts of hydrogen from sewage, this system also cleans the water. Conceptually, treatment plants could be developed that take in sewage on one end and send clean water and hydrogen fuel out the other. Their production potential may only be limited by the amount of raw waste they have available – and sewage in the future may no longer be a waste disposal problem but rather a valued commodity, another important component of the nation's sustainable energy equation.
Other forms of biowaste could also be used, scientists say. The use of woody biomass is possible. The large amounts of waste from food processing factories would be a good candidate, as well as agricultural waste such as the huge amounts of manure produced in cattle, hog, and other livestock operations. In that context, it may be quite possible to make a silk purse out of a sow's rear.
All of this was achieved through fundamental research on "microbial electrolysis cells," or MECs, that use a new "membrane free" approach that costs less and is significantly more efficient than existing approaches.
In these systems, naturally occurring microorganisms from sewage attach to the surface of an anode and degrade the waste in the sewage, in a device that is something like a battery. The waste decomposes, eventually leaving protons that migrate to the cathode, combine with electrons and generate hydrogen.
These systems can be adapted to generate electricity directly or used to produce hydrogen, which in turn can be used to produce electricity from hydrogen fuel cells – an existing and widely proven technology.
"Hydrogen has often been thought of as the ideal fuel to run fuel-cell powered automobiles," Liu said. "Hydrogen fuel cells are about 60 percent efficient, roughly double that of a gasoline internal combustion engine. And there is no air pollution; the only byproduct from operation of the fuel cell is water."
One of the biggest steps still needed to make this type of fuel cell vehicle a reality is solving hydrogen production issues – and the new technology developed in Liu's laboratory might produce hydrogen at a cost close to the DOE goal. Those cost figures do not include the potential savings of billions of dollars spent in treating the nation's wastewater, which further increase the economical viability of the technology.
"Another interesting application of this approach might be in developing countries or remote areas," Liu said. "Often these places have few or no waste treatment plants, and no practical way in a remote location to produce electricity. Small systems used there might solve both problems.
"There's no doubt this could help contribute to a more sustainable future," Liu said. "We could clean up our sewage and produce fuel at the same time. That's very promising."
Provided by Oregon State University
» Next Article in Technology - Energy: ZPower claims its silver-zinc batteries last 40% longer than lithium-ion
Video
Editorials
Free Magazines
Free White Papers
Newsletter
Advanced Search
Goto Archive
Suggest a story idea
Send feedback
