Toolbox
Share on facebook Reddit del.icio.us Save to Yahoo! bookmarks Slashdot it Save to Windows live Save to MySpace science news feed Add to google
- size +

ITER, IAEA sign deal to move nuclear fusion research forward

Technicians work at a nuclear reactor. Key nuclear international institutions signed a deal to step up their collaboration marking a step forward in the development of a multibillion dollar experimental nuclear fusion project.
Technicians work at a nuclear reactor. Key nuclear international institutions signed a deal to step up their collaboration, marking a step forward in the development of a multibillion dollar experimental nuclear fusion project.

Key nuclear international institutions on Monday signed a deal to step up their collaboration, marking a step forward in the development of a multibillion dollar experimental nuclear fusion project.
The accord was signed in Geneva by International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) Director General Kaname Ikeda and Yury Sokolov, the deputy director general of the UN's nucler watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

The agreement would strengthen the exchange of information and training of scientists between the two organisations.

"The exchange in experience is very important," Sokolov said.

The ITER thermonuclear project aims to research a clean and limitless alternative to dwindling fossil fuel reserves by testing nuclear fusion technologies.

Instead of splitting the atom -- the principle behind current nuclear plants -- the project seeks to harness nuclear fusion: the power of the sun and the stars achieved by fusing together atomic nuclei.

If it is successful, a prototype commercial reactor will be built, and if that works, fusion technology will be rolled out across the world.

The EU, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Russia and the US are involved in the experimental project, with the reactor currently under construction in the south of France, at Cadarache.

"The need in energy is so huge that our efforts for ITER... is not a waste of money," said Solokov.

© 2008 AFP

would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

4.5 out of 5 after 18 total votes
  • not at all
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • highly

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by Szkeptik 10/13/08 11:01
Rank: 3/5 after 3 votes
If only that 20 year wait time would ever get shorter...
Posted by NeilFarbstein 10/13/08 18:07
Rank: 5/5 after 3 votes
The DOE is going about researching nuclear fusion in the worst way possible. They waste a lot of money on programs that provide no new data and they are closed to other ideas no matter how meritorious they are. They have not really committed themselves to making practical fusion reactors.
Posted by Ant 10/13/08 19:33
Rank: 1/5 after 6 votes
you can no more fuse 2 atoms to make third than combine 2 cubes to make a third cube. Fermat knew.
Posted by Eco_R1 10/14/08 00:18
Rank: 1.7/5 after 3 votes
do you really think they will roll out a working fusion reactor while there is still a lot of oil to be sold to the world, think again... people shops and even goverments will always try and make the most money they can from selling you one product before moving onto a "new and improved", "already existing" product. the same for energy technology, why move on while there is still trillions to be made. its fuc@#%up, i know!
Posted by Sophos 10/14/08 11:10
Rank: 4.5/5 after 2 votes
Eco - YES
Fusion would create a whole new industry which means lots of jobs. Not to mention that there will still be a hell of a lot of cars needing gas. And what civilized government doesn't want to see the mid-east's stranglehold evaporate!!
Posted by Noumenon 10/14/08 11:44
Not rated yet.
Yes indeed. And who's 'they'? The other "they"'s will be in a position to compete in the energy market once oil becomes harder and more expensive to extract.
Posted by Noumenon 10/14/08 11:49
Not rated yet.
Ant: you can no more fuse 2 atoms to make third than combine 2 cubes to make a third cube. Fermat knew.


Atoms are not cubes. What powers the sun for billions of years? Rearrangement of energy; e=mc^2.
Posted by Ant 10/14/08 12:30
Rank: 1.5/5 after 2 votes
Hi Noumenon
who said they were? if our universe has a background 3D matrix/lattice its likely that all the sub particles of an atom are maintained in their relative positions by the holes in that matrix which leads me to suggest the possibility that the atom is held by its parts in a cubic section of that matix and one would have to allow for the combing of multiple sections of the matrix to acheive the next largest cube in fact to acheive a combined fusion it would take a minimum of 8 atoms to form the next size cube. Therefore I would suggest that the sun's process is far more involved than current envisaged.

If you consider this is not possible the screen you are cuurently looking at is a matrix in which many shapes can be represented.
Posted by Alizee 10/15/08 17:21
Rank: 3/5 after 1 vote
Nice, but...
..why Arata's cold fusion few dollars experiments weren't verified already? Because the governments and energetic lobby isn't interested into development of distributed sources of energy?

http://physicswor...p_1.html
Posted by mummy 10/15/08 19:42
Not rated yet.
The physics press has completely over-looked the fact that Robert Bussard has developed a WORKING method of what's called Inertial Electrostatic Fusion that was re-funded by the DOE in 2007, shortly before his premature death. Anyone interested developing virtual free energy in the real geopolitical world can view Dr. Bussard's work in an hour video at http://video.goog...73788606
Posted by Wicked 10/18/08 04:51
Not rated yet.
Not surprising, considering Bussard kept silent about it for 11 years.