Do cell phones increase brain cancer risk?

October 20, 2008

Major research initiatives are needed immediately to assess the possibility that using cellular phones may lead to an increased risk of brain tumors, according to an editorial in the November issue of the journal Surgical Neurology, published by Elsevier.

Recent studies have raised concerns that long-term exposure to electromagnetic fields (ELF) from cell-phone handsets can increase the risk of brain cancers and other nervous system tumors, according to the editorial by Dr. Ron Pawl, a neurosurgeon at Lake Forest Hospital, Lake Forest, Ill. He calls for collaborative research initiatives to determine whether the link between cell phones and brain cancer is real.

Scientists have long been concerned over the possibility that ELF exposure may increase the risk of brain cancers. Until recently, however, research has shown no clear link between cell phone use and brain tumors.

Earlier this year, a Swedish research group published an epidemiologic study suggesting an increased risk of brain cancers (gliomas) as well as acoustic nerve tumors (neuromas) in people using cell phones for ten years or longer. Tumors were more likely to develop on the same side as the cell phone was used. Other studies by the same group suggested that the use of wireless handsets in cordless home phones posed the same risk.

After reviewing the evidence, one author even suggested that long-term cell phone use is "more dangerous to health than smoking cigarettes." Other recent commentators have raised similar concerns.

The findings are alarming in light of the exponential growth of cell phones—now including widespread use by children and teenagers. The damaging effects of ELF, if any, might be even greater in the developing brain.

If the link is real, then rates of brain cancers should have increased over the last two decades. Some studies have reported that this is the case, particularly for the most malignant brain cancers. However, other studies have found a stable tumor rate.

Some commentators have suggested that apparent increases in the number of brain cancers might reflect the use of sophisticated imaging techniques like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. "However, the fact that the incidence of gliomas, especially the more malignant varieties, is increasing [...] warrants action on this issue," Dr. Pawl writes.

The problem, according to Dr. Pawl, is that no other research groups have performed actual studies showing a clear relationship between brain tumors and ELF. He calls on scientific societies to play a leading role in designing and conducting studies that will definitively determine the risks of brain cancer associated with ELF exposure, particularly from cell phones. "It seems that a cooperative effort by both the scientific community and state governing bodies will be needed," writes Dr. Pawl. "Some spearhead is now necessary in view of the magnitude and seriousness of the situation."

Paper link: http://www.surgica … y-online.com

Source: Elsevier

3.7 /5 (29 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Modernmystic
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
No...
Tekito
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 2.6 / 5 (7)
Yes
Modernmystic
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Wow better turn off all your lights then Tek...visible light is higher frequency (ie closer to the ACTUAL cancer causing ionizing radiation) than microwaves are.
Velanarris
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
Wow better turn off all your lights then Tek...visible light is higher frequency (ie closer to the ACTUAL cancer causing ionizing radiation) than microwaves are.


Doesn't matter. Cell phones operate on similar frequencies as many other household objects.

We all have the brain cancer now. Or, they're completely wrong, vote now by texting tumor to 1-800-CANCRRnD
Sirussinder
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)


Does Japan have a spike in brain cancer on the common right handed, right ear, left brain side since the cell phone craze?

NO...by now there would have been a pattern emerging in the population and there does not appear to be.
hudres
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.
M_N
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (4)
Since when did ELF stand for "electromagnetic fields"? I think they mean EMF. Hard to take an article seriously when they repeatedly make such a basic mistake.
Sophos
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.


After a Ph.D. in this field I do not believe non-ionizing radiation causes cancer. I just don't see a mechanism for damage.

However hudres if it does; headsets mean you are probably using the phone near your waist (cliped on or in pocket). There are a lot of organs near your waist much more sensitive to cancer induction than your brain.
Velanarris
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
The use of headsets, as required by law for drivers in many states, completely mitigates this problem.


After a Ph.D. in this field I do not believe non-ionizing radiation causes cancer. I just don't see a mechanism for damage.

However hudres if it does; headsets mean you are probably using the phone near your waist (cliped on or in pocket). There are a lot of organs near your waist much more sensitive to cancer induction than your brain.


Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.
GrayMouser
Oct 20, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Why worry? It was an editorial not serious science...
Soylent
Oct 21, 2008

Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.


Why would you expect a "range in which cancer causing radiation would be found" around 2.4 GHz?
Bob_Kob
Oct 21, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Higher frequency means bad.
Velanarris
Oct 21, 2008

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Not to mention that bluetooth is a 2.4 ghz signal. Which is closer to the range in which cancer causing radiation would be found than cellular signal.


Why would you expect a "range in which cancer causing radiation would be found" around 2.4 GHz?
Not expecting anything.

2.4 Ghz is closer to the bands of ionizing radiation than cellular 2.1 ghz is.
Lord_jag
Oct 21, 2008

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
In real estate ELF is Electrical Light Fixtures.... as in all the chandeleers and such.

What does this have to do with cell phones?
Rank 3.7 /5 (29 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Study finds that anti-diabetic medication can prevent the long-term effects of maternal obesity

In a study to be presented today at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting, in Dallas, Texas, researchers will report findings that show that short therapy with the anti-diabetic medication ...

Medicine & Health / Health

created 20 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 1

FDA-approved drug rapidly clears amyloid from the brain, reverses Alzheimer's symptoms in mice

Neuroscientists at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have made a dramatic breakthrough in their efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The researchers' findings, published in the journal Science, show t ...

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (52) | comments 20 | with audio podcast

Steroid injections prove effective in treatment of lumbar disc herniations

The use of epidural steroid injections may be a more efficient treatment option for lumbar disc herniations, according to research presented today at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine's Specialty Day in ...

Medicine & Health / Health

created 20 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Teen school drop-outs three times as likely to be on benefits in later life

Teen school drop-outs are almost three times as likely to be on benefits in later life as their peers who complete their schooling, indicates research published online in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

Medicine & Health / Health

created Feb 06, 2012 | popularity not rated yet | comments 11

Amateur football players not always keen on returning to play after ACL injuries

Despite the known success rates of reconstructive Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) surgery, the number of high school and collegiate football players returning to play may not be as high as anticipated, say researchers presenting ...

Medicine & Health / Health

created 20 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...

Latin America mining boom clashes with conservation

Latin America is experiencing a mining boom as prices rise fuelled by a hike in global demand, but the region is also being hit by a wave of violent protests, strikes and rallies by environmentalists.

Love a click away in Indonesia's Twitter Republic

He was a geeky kid from Yogyakarta, she a glamorous city girl in Jakarta. In a country with one of the world's most vibrant social networking scenes they fell in love on Twitter.

Walney offshore wind farm is world's biggest (for now)

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Walney wind farm on the Irish Sea--characterized by high tides, waves and windy weather--officially opened this week. The farm is treated in the press as a very big deal as the Walney ...

GPS court ruling leaves US phone tracking unclear

A US Supreme Court decision requiring a warrant to place a GPS device on the car of a criminal suspect leaves unresolved the bigger issue of police tracking using mobile phones, legal experts say.

Europeans protest controversial Internet pact

Tens of thousands of people marched in protests in more than a dozen European cities Saturday against a controversial anti-online piracy pact that critics say could curtail Internet freedom.