Symantec, McAfee upgrade security software
October 24, 2008 By Andrew D. SmithSecurity software has improved every year, but it has always operated on similar principles. Until now. New releases from Symantec Corp. and McAfee Inc. challenge fundamental assumptions about how security suites work.
Content from McClatchy-Tribune Information Services expires 90 days after original publication date. For more information about McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, please visit www.mctdirect.com .
Similar stories from PHYSorg:
Microsoft to release free antivirus PC software
Sep 29, 2009 |
2.9 / 5 (22) |
10
'Phishing' drops; are scammers switching tactics?
Aug 26, 2009 |
3.3 / 5 (3) |
0
A few pennies for your thoughts -- and credit card
Apr 14, 2009 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
0
Symantec Adds SMB Disaster Recovery Services
Apr 18, 2007 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
0
Don't fret about Conficker: Here's what to do
Mar 31, 2009 |
5 / 5 (3) |
2



So I've been told for 15 years now.
But I never have encountered malware - on my eComStation (aka OS/2) system.
McAfee and Symantec have never been in the top anti-virus spots because they are and have always been useless.
Enter NOD32, BitDefender and Kaspersky.
The top three.
"Even if you eliminate all delay between first spotting a virus and updating your database, there's still no way to protect against many unknown viruses"
What a crock, that's what anti-viruses are meant to do, it's called Heuristics.
I agree with Kaspersky. When I used to use Windows, it was one of a couple of security apps I used to speak highly of. Problem I had with Norton was compatibility with the OS it was meant to be installed on. Too much bloat but at least they're trying to improve their product towards that direction.
meh, they have to inform their consumer base I guess.
That's because if you're a crook or an agitator you don't write software that's only going to effect about a percent of the population....
I've been using this software for nearly two years now, monitoring the security of the desktop, media center, and two laptops at my home and my daughter's desktop 1200 miles away. It is cheaper than subscriptions to the other services if you have multiple PCs to secure.
It seems to be a well integrated and virtually automatic system... the one annoyance is that I only need to be reminded about what it's done ONCE a day, not every time I log in!