All the omega-3s without the mercury

November 21st, 2008 By Julie Deardorff

Problem: I'm taking fish oil supplements. But I still worry about mercury contamination.

---

Content from McClatchy-Tribune Information Services expires 90 days after original publication date. For more information about McClatchy-Tribune Information Services, please visit www.mctdirect.com .

---

Similar stories from PHYSorg:

Antenatal fish oil supplements boost kids' hand-eye coordination

Dec 21, 2006 | 4.7 / 5 (3) | 0

Mercury contamination found in stranded Victorian dolphins

Jun 10, 2008 | 4 / 5 (2) | 0

Worried about mercury? It's easy to choose safer fish

Jun 26, 2009 | 5 / 5 (1) | 1

Fish oil -- helpful or harmful?

Jan 14, 2008 | 3.8 / 5 (11) | 0

Study shows mercury levels from products decreasing, though still at dangerous levels

May 06, 2008 | 3.7 / 5 (7) | 0

• greensky - Nov 22, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
  • rate
  Is there any reason flax seed isn't a good alternative?
  • flag
• smiffy - Nov 22, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  There seems to be a push for marketing marine fish oils going on at the moment.
  
  See http://www.physor...234.html
  • flag
• abburdlen - Nov 22, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  greensky- Flax and other vegetable source provide omega-3 in the form of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA). Marine sources provide the forms docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) & eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) both of those have been shown to reduce the risk of heart attack and evidence of a host of other benefits.
  The body can covert ALA to EPA & DHA but not very efficiently.
  • flag
• morpheus2012 - Nov 22, 2008
  • Current rank
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
  • rate
  yes u need to get a pure fish oil couse otherwise
  u might doing more harm then good
  
  one of the purest above stadards is from life extension fundation
  
  lef.org i belive
  • flag