Govt pays for deadly, unapproved drugs (Update)

Does the Author then advocate a ban of asprin?
This story lacks perspective. There are many drugs that predate any FDA approval process or FDA for that matter. Just as some herbal medicines used for thousands of years, may have real theraputic value, so do some of these unapproved drugs. Unapproved does not mean obsolete or bad. Furthermore, valuable patents are the only incentive for a drug manufacturer to spend hundreds of millions or billions on a drug approval process. Requiring one simply amounts to banning the drug. Who would pay $2 billion to try to get some niche drug, used by a few thousand eighty year olds, for 60 years, approved by the FDA?
Should we be deprived of our own Western heritage of folk medicines?
The fact is that the FDA drug approval process, sometimes better and sometimes worse, over the decades, is now more or less broken. Getting a drug approved is now prohibitively expensive, even for Pharm giants with expectations of lucrative patents. Little drugs like these, in the public domain, don't have a prayer of approval, regardless of efficacy.

"Dozens of deaths have been linked to them. " So why should we care? I'm pretty sure you could save more lives spending this money elsewhere.

The masses will see this in a headline and gasp, "Oh how horrible! There oughta be a law!".

As is typical, the haves test their new and "dangerous" drugs on the have nots.

Welcome to the world. Human trials start with the poorest, not the most affluent. When the drug is proven to work well and is valuable, the haves can afford the "safer" version, while the have-nots cannot afford it whatsoever.

Some of these drugs have been in use for a long time, probably longer than aspirin. Some do need to go, but some do not have a ready alternative, such as quinine. There are many people that have tried alternatives, but can't sleep due to their leg cramps.