Wait a second: 2008 gets extended by timekeepers

December 8, 2008

(AP) -- With a brutal economic slowdown, 2008 may feel as if it will never end. Now the world's timekeepers are making it even longer by adding a leap second to the last day of the year.

---

Content from The Associated Press expires 15 days after original publication date. For more information about The Associated Press, please visit www.ap.org .

---

Similar stories from PHYSorg:

China Mobile reports 2008 net profit up 30 percent

Mar 19, 2009 | not rated yet | 0

PC maker Lenovo reports loss amid weak demand

Aug 06, 2009 | 5 / 5 (1) | 0

Famed TED talks available in multiple languages

May 13, 2009 | 4 / 5 (1) | 0

Philips posts surprise profit as cost cuts help

Oct 12, 2009 | not rated yet | 0

AARP: Prescription drug prices on the rise

Apr 15, 2009 | 5 / 5 (2) | 0

• Ausjin - Dec 08, 2008
  • Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
  I know the earth will eventually be tidally locked with the sun, but I figured the slowdown was far too gradual to show in my lifetime.
  
  Still, I would have to be pretty obsessive compulsive to care about 2008 being 31,556,927 seconds instead of 31,556,926
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• PB94941 - Dec 08, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  awesome, i better change my clock, wouldn't want it being wrong.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• dbren - Dec 08, 2008
  • Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
  So, this will happen at midnight UTC. Does that mean than in Britain they will count down to midnight "10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1, 0"?
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Nartoon - Dec 08, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
  Arrrggghhh, will 2008 ever end.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• axemaster - Dec 08, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
  "I know the earth will eventually be tidally locked with the sun, but I figured the slowdown was far too gradual to show in my lifetime."
  
  Actually, you're wrong about that. The Earth is tidally locked with the Moon, not the Sun.
  
  This effect on the Earth's rotation is intrinsically linked to the fact that the Moon is slowly receding from the Earth - it's a transfer of energy and momentum from one to the other.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Roach - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
  Publicity stunt. They act like the year is exactly 365.25 days long. The actual length is closer to 365.26, in that referance the 1 second makes no diferance versus the 10 to 15 minutes we gain each year.
  
  Also can some clarify the differance between 6:59:60PM and 7:00:00PM and 1900:00? Other than the obvious that no one uses 6:59:60 as a time designation. Like saying I'm 5ft 12in tall or its about 1 Km and 1000m to the post office. If their clock actually says 6:59:60 then it might have already broke.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• moj85 - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
  @ Roach:
  I think the 6:59:60 is referring to the fact that the minute of 6:59 will have 1 more second to it, so in fact will turn to 6:59:60 before switching to 7:00:00pm. Maybe? Yes.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Roach - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
  That was my first thought, but the use of a present participle versus the future tense makes it more likely that the writer, AP gosh knows they know what they're talking about(sarcasm), flubbed.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• MGraser - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
  I doubt it was a flub. It could have been the author's "cute" way of describing it. Or, more likely, since they need to watch to make sure the transition happens properly, it will show 60 instead of standing still for one second before moving onto 7pm. Plus it makes logical sense that since there are 61 seconds in that hour, it should show the 60, just as we currently show 59 when we have 60 seconds in the hour.
  
  Having said this, this conversation is stupid and inane....
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• fmfbrestel - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  No publicity stunt. Yes we gain 15 minutes or so each year, but those extra minutes are already planned into the system of leap days. There is a big difference between the time it takes earth to go around the sun and and the time it takes the earth to rotate on its axis -- which is what they are correcting here.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Roach - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet
  Either way my chief point was the second doesn't matter in comparison to the 10 minute variations. It's a publicity stunt and nothing else.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Centauri777 - Dec 09, 2008
  • Rank: not rated yet

  I know the earth will eventually be tidally locked with the sun, but I figured the slowdown was far too gradual to show in my lifetime.
  
  Still, I would have to be pretty obsessive compulsive to care about 2008 being 31,556,927 seconds instead of 31,556,926

  
  
  actually, 31,556,926 doesnt cut it either. the days in the year ARE an integer; (3600*24*366) 1 yields 31,622,401 (and YES, I do get obsessive about math)
  
  for details: http://www.physli...e695.cfm
  
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5