Third-hand smoke: Another reason to quit smoking

December 29, 2008

Need another reason to add "Quit Smoking" to your New Year's resolutions list? How about the fact that even if you choose to smoke outside of your home or only smoke in your home when your children are not there - thinking that you're keeping them away from second-hand smoke - you're still exposing them to toxins? In the January issue of Pediatrics, researchers at MassGeneral Hospital for Children (MGHfC) and colleagues across the country describe how tobacco smoke contamination lingers even after a cigarette is extinguished - a phenomenon they define as "third-hand" smoke. Their study is the first to examine adult attitudes about the health risks to children of third-hand smoke and how those beliefs may relate to rules about smoking in their homes.

"When you smoke - anyplace - toxic particulate matter from tobacco smoke gets into your hair and clothing," says lead study author, Jonathan Winickoff, MD, MPH, assistant director of the MGHfC Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy. "When you come into contact with your baby, even if you're not smoking at the time, she comes in contact with those toxins. And if you breastfeed, the toxins will transfer to your baby in your breastmilk." Winickoff notes that nursing a baby if you're a smoker is still preferable to bottle-feeding, however.

Particulate matter from tobacco smoke has been proven toxic. According to the National Toxicology Program, these 250 poisonous gases, chemicals, and metals include hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, butane, ammonia, toluene (found in paint thinners), arsenic, lead, chromium (used to make steel), cadmium (used to make batteries), and polonium-210 (highly radioactive carcinogen). Eleven of the compounds are classified as Group 1 carcinogens, the most dangerous.

Small children are especially susceptible to third-hand smoke exposure because they can inhale near, crawl and play on, or touch and mouth contaminated surfaces. Third-hand smoke can remain indoors even long after the smoking has stopped. Similar to low-level lead exposure, low levels of tobacco particulates have been associated with cognitive deficits among children, and the higher the exposure level, the lower the reading score. These findings underscore the possibility that even extremely low levels of these compounds may be neurotoxic and, according to the researchers, justify restricting all smoking in indoor areas inhabited by children.

"The dangers of third-hand smoke are very real," says Winickoff, who is a professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Richmond Center. "Our goal was to find out if people who were aware of these harmful effects were less likely to smoke inside of their home."

Winickoff's team found that this was the case. In a survey of more than 1,500 households, 95.4 percent of nonsmokers versus 84.1 percent of smokers agreed that second-hand smoke harms the health of children, and 65.2 percent of nonsmokers versus 43.3 percent of smokers believed that third-hand smoke harms children. Strict rules prohibiting smoke in the home were more prevalent among nonsmokers - 88.4 percent versus 26.7 percent - but among both smokers and non-smokers, participants who agreed that environmental smoke was harmful to children's health were more likely to have restrictions on smoking in their homes.

Winickoff's study shows that increasing awareness of how third-hand smoke harms the health of children may encourage home smoking bans. It also will be important to incorporate knowledge about third-hand smoke contamination into current tobacco control campaigns, programs, and routine clinical practice.

For more information on increasing awareness of the hazards of second- and third-hand smoke to prevent smoking and encourage smoking bans in the home, visit http://www.ceasetobacco.org , a website founded by Winickoff.

Source: Massachusetts General Hospital

2.9 /5 (14 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Velanarris
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (8)
Or, you could regularly clean your house and stop living in a shithole.
WolfAtTheDoor
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
The anti-smoking lobby is equally clueless and obnoxious.

http://www.npr.or...98004872
DeadCorpse
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (9)
In order to avoid ALL environmental toxins, from any source whatsoever including those naturally produced that are thousands of times more carcinogenic than tobacco smoke, the solution is simple:

Stop breathing altogether.
Nemo
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Toxins are toxins. If any other product produced the menagerie of carcinogens that tobacco smoke produces it would be banned immediately.
Velanarris
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Toxins are toxins. If any other product produced the menagerie of carcinogens that tobacco smoke produces it would be banned immediately.


I don't think you realize that the "harmful" carcinogens in tobacco smoke are mirrored in most products we use. For instance, most household appliances release agent orange when burned.
JerryPark
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Researchers with a predefined agenda should be banned from further research.

Of course, they won't be.
E_L_Earnhardt
Dec 29, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
It's the CURING process that increases electron activity, (energy), in the smoke - which increases energy in the air breathed. Also, its SEEDS are treated by radiation to enhance growth. Indians who smoked peace pipes outlived those who didn't!
Soylent
Dec 30, 2008

Rank: 4.4 / 5 (5)
I don't think you realize that the "harmful" carcinogens in tobacco smoke are mirrored in most products we use. For instance, most household appliances release agent orange when burned.


No it doesn't. You're probably thinking of dioxins, one of the nastier pollutants found in agent orange, but that's not agent orange itself.

And would you mind telling me just who these people intentionally burning PVC plastic in or near their own home are so I can stay the hell away from them?
Velanarris
Dec 30, 2008

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
I don't think you realize that the "harmful" carcinogens in tobacco smoke are mirrored in most products we use. For instance, most household appliances release agent orange when burned.


No it doesn't. You're probably thinking of dioxins, one of the nastier pollutants found in agent orange, but that's not agent orange itself.

And would you mind telling me just who these people intentionally burning PVC plastic in or near their own home are so I can stay the hell away from them?
Sorry, you're right, dioxins rather than agent orange itself, however, these same plastics are used in multiple applications where they come in close contact with heat, for instance, some oven gloves contain small beads of plastic, a lot of ashtrays are made of the same plastics, etc.

Using the term carcinogen makes people go a little bit loopy since they don't realize jsut about everything around them contains cancer causing agents.
RFC
Dec 30, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Researchers with an agenda? Ha! Just because this study documents yet another bad effect of smoking?

"Regularly cleaning your house"... yeah, that does the trick! That's why apartments have to be repainted and carpets treated after smokers live in them to kill the smell.... and oftentimes that doesn't do it.

And let's group exposure to second or third hand smoke with all other airborne toxins, because the comparison is just SO similar.

This study says something pretty simple (for those of you that read it). Exposing babies to the crap that smoking leaves behind is bad. That's a big fat "Duh!" in my book. There's no agenda, there isn't even a counter-intuitive result.

For those of you that disagree, go ahead and wrap your babies up in the blankets you keep in the same closet as your smoke-soaked coats and jackets. They'll be fine. Honest.

RFC
Dec 30, 2008

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Researchers with an agenda? Ha! Just because this study documents yet another bad effect of smoking?

"Regularly cleaning your house"... yeah, that does the trick! That's why apartments have to be repainted and carpets treated after smokers live in them to kill the smell.... and oftentimes that doesn't do it.

And let's group exposure to second or third hand smoke with all other airborne toxins, because the comparison is just SO similar.

This study says something pretty simple (for those of you that read it). Exposing babies to the crap that smoking leaves behind is bad. That's a big fat "Duh!" in my book. There's no agenda, there isn't even a counter-intuitive result.

For those of you that disagree, go ahead and wrap your babies up in the blankets you keep in the same closet as your smoke-soaked coats and jackets. They'll be fine. Honest.


GrayMouser
Dec 30, 2008

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
"Third hand smoke"???

Vilifying something by giving it a new name? Add in the 'children' aspect as a propaganda ploy and you know that the health Nazis are out in force.
Egnite
Dec 31, 2008

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
When will they study the effects that car pollution has on kiddies? Oh wait, no-one is gonna pay for that since everybody drives and the elite aren't ready for electric cars yet.
Pointedly
Jan 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Stress is the biggest danger of all. There are more books about stress in circulation worldwide than there are bibles in circulation. I hope the authors of this "helpful" study are pleased with the level of increase in stress that they have achieved, and congratulations...you increased the stress levels in smokers and non-smokers alike.
Pointedly
Jan 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Some people find the risks associated with smoking and the social pressures of smoking too stressful. Those people choose not to smoke. Some people find the pleasure of smoking outweighs the risks and find the relief from stress provided by smoking keeps social pressures at bay. They find smoking relaxes while maintaining intensity in the same way that a good cup of coffee does. Those people choose to continue to smoke. Guess how difference your study will make to either group?
Mud
Jan 04, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
It is the concentration of smoke and what it leaves behind in the confined area of a home that is the cause for concern. If you have a child with high risks for problems caused by smoke then YOU should be concerned. My mother died at age 47 (I was 19) because she chose to smoke to relieve STRESS. She developed gangrene in both legs and spent six weeks dying in a hospital while enduring six operations to remove her legs - piecemeal. She also lost the OPTION of smoking to relieve her STRESS. Hospitals do not allow smoking in intensive care. She was very sorry she was never able to stop smoking. Unfortunately, it was too late for her. She could not stop when she was carrying me. When I was born I had constant ear and throat infections. Bronchitis and sinusitis became a chronic part of my life. Then I developed asthma. Before age 50 I was on PERMANENT SS disability. Thank you, Mom, RIP. I watch COUNTLESS children going through similar lives to mine. Why? Because selfish parents can't comprehend that years & years of daily smoke build-up by thousands of cigarettes, cigars, etc. are NOT the same as short-lived, short-term exposure to other things mentioned I've read here. The only odor that I have smelled CONSISTANTLY on children on a regular basis is smoke from a household of a person or persons who delude themselves that it is ok to do so. If, as a parent, you are ok with your child smelling like the inside of an ashtray and breathing the same, day after day, then why not just spread some arsenic or spray some DDT in your home and make it easier on all of us. Anyone dying because someone smoked is a slow, painful, UNNECESSARY death. Just ask the son of the late Mrs. Reeves. I can and do sympathize with him. May some of you learn that stress is a part of life, get over your selfish selves and stop ingesting that which harms you and others. I wish everyone the best.
Pointedly
Jan 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Some people find the risks associated with smoking and the social pressures of smoking too stressful. Those people choose not to smoke. Some people find the pleasure of smoking outweighs the risks and find the relief from stress provided by smoking keeps social pressures at bay. They find smoking relaxes while maintaining intensity in the same way that a good cup of coffee does. Those people choose to continue to smoke. Guess how much difference your study will make to either group?

Rank 2.9 /5 (14 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

FDA-approved drug rapidly clears amyloid from the brain, reverses Alzheimer's symptoms in mice

Neuroscientists at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have made a dramatic breakthrough in their efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The researchers' findings, published in the journal Science, show t ...

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 11 hours ago | popularity 4.9 / 5 (32) | comments 14 | with audio podcast

Anyone can learn to be more inventive, cognitive researcher says

There will always be a wild and unpredictable quality to creativity and invention, says Anthony McCaffrey, a cognitive psychology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, because an "Aha moment" is rare and ...

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 7 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (5) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Cell biologists describes mechanism by which some people may be more susceptible to colon cancer

An international research team led by cell biologists at the University of California, Riverside has uncovered a new insight into colon cancer, the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United ...

Medicine & Health / Cancer

created 7 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Researchers weigh in on ethics of H5N1 research

(Medical Xpress) -- In a commentary on the biosecurity controversy surrounding publication of bird flu research details, a bioethicist and a vaccine expert at Johns Hopkins reaffirm that "all scientists have an affirmativ ...

Medicine & Health / Other

created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

To perform with less effort, practice beyond perfection

Whether you are an athlete, a musician or a stroke patient learning to walk again, practice can make perfect, but more practice may make you more efficient, according to a surprising new University of Colorado Boulder study.

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 10 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (8) | comments 3 | with audio podcast


'Dark plasmons' transmit energy

Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.

Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water

A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...

Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets

Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...

New method makes culture of complex tissue possible in any lab

Scientists at the University of California, San Diego have developed a new method for making scaffolds for culturing tissue in three-dimensional arrangements that mimic those in the body. This advance, published online in ...

Flexible paper robots

(PhysOrg.com) -- These inexpensive robots can stretch, bend and twist under control, and lift objects up to 120 times their own weight. Being soft, they can apply gentle and even pressure, and adapt to varied ...

Soraa LED light may dim 50-watt halogen rivals

(PhysOrg.com) -- Soraa, a Fremont, California company founded in 2008, this week launched its first product, a light that uses LEDS (light emitting diodes). The "Soraa LED MR16 lamp" is the "perfect" replacement ...