Who cares about the fourth dimension?
February 3, 2009
Comic Gravitation (c) Florian Aigner
Austrian scientists are trying to understand the mysteries of the holographic principle: How many dimensions are there in our universe?
Some of the brightest minds of the world are doing research work in this sector - and still have not succeeded so far: Creating a unified theory of quantum gravitation is often considered to be the “Holy Grail” of modern science. Daniel Grumiller from the Institute of Theoretical Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Austria, can now at least unravel some of the mysteries of quantum gravitation. His results on black holes and gravitational waves are pretty mind-boggling - to say the least. Only recently he won the START prize and will use these funds to engage even more young physicians at the TU Vienna.
We perceive the space around us as three-dimensional. According to Einstein, time and space are inseparabely linked. Adding the time axis to our three-dimensional space makes our space-time-continuum four-dimensional. For decades, scientists have been wondering about the existence of additional dimensions so far hidden to our senses. Grumiller and his colleagues are trying the opposite approach: Instead of postulating additional dimensions, they believe that our universe could in fact be described by less than four dimensions.
“A hologram, as you find it on bank notes or credit cards, appears to show a three-dimensional picture, even though in fact it is just two-dimensional”, Grumiller explains. In such a case, reality has fewer dimensions than we would thinkit appears to have. This “holographic principle” plays an important role in the physics of space time. Instead of creating a theory of gravity in all the time and space dimensions, one can formulate a new quantum theory with one fewer spatial dimension. That way, a 3D theory of gravitation turns into a 2D quantum theory, in which gravity does not appear any more. Still, this quantum theory correctly predicts phenomena like black holes or gravitational waves.
“The question, how many dimensions our world really has, does probably not even have a proper answerprobably cannot be answered explicitly”, Grumiller thinks. “Depending on the particular question we are trying to answer, either one of the approaches may turn out to be more useful.”
Grumiller is currently working on gravitational theories which include two spatial dimensions and one time dimension. They can be mapped onto a two-dimensional gravitationless quantum theory. Such theories can be used to describe rapidly rotating black holes or “cosmic strings” - spacetime defects, which probably appeared shortly after the Big Bang.
Together with colleagues from the University of Vienna, Grumiller is organizing an international workshop, which will take place from April 14 to 24, 2009. Renowned participants, like scientists from Harvard, Princeton, the MIT and many other universities, reveal that the Viennese gravitation physicians are held in high regard internationally.
Source: TU Vienna
-
The perfect liquid -- now even more perfect
Jan 17, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (10) |
9
-
String theory researchers simulate big-bang on supercomputer
Dec 14, 2011 |
4.7 / 5 (24) |
75
-
An elegant multiverse? Professor Brian Greene considers the possibilities
Mar 22, 2011 |
4.6 / 5 (25) |
26
-
Physicists Demonstrate How Information Can Escape From Black Holes
May 14, 2008 |
4.3 / 5 (99) |
15
-
Einstein Equations
Feb 16, 2006 |
4.6 / 5 (73) |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Liverpool vs Manchester United
1 hour ago
-
Wearing black in a desert
1 hour ago
-
Did space exist before mass?
1 hour ago
-
How can E&M Waves be polarized?
1 hour ago
-
Does light travel for ever?
2 hours ago
-
Infinity by Particles
3 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
9 hours ago |
4.4 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find
Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
13 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (2) |
0
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (16) |
53
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (12)
http://aetherwave...ime.html
We can realize it, if we consider the following facts:
1) The time and space always occurs together, in artifact, which is called a space-time
2) The space-time can have a different number of time and space dimensions, usually three spatial dimensions and one time dimensions. Albeit another models with different number of space or even time dimensions are considered as well in physics, so it's apparent, the number of space and time dimensions isn't limited.
3) Important thing is, the time has always an "arrow" despite of its actual definitions - while the space hasn't.
4) Fully chaotic environment doesn't enable the propagation of energy into distance, so it has no space. The time arrow cannot be observed inside of such system, so such system hasn't even time arrow - or it has an infinite time arrows, it depends on the onthologic perspective, you're preffering.
5) All massive objects are moving through space-time along geodesics, i.e. by analogous way, like the energy spreads through density gradients
The lack of trivial conceptual models following from missunderstanding and false refusal of Aether concept is what prohibits scientists to advance faster in understanding of Universe connections.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
http://www.newsci...arn.html
The 3D version of that phenomena coresponds the ancient Fatio-LeSage model of gravity.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Now for my comments-
IF this turned out to be the case, and we're actually in a 2 dimensional plane of existence, this would completely and utterly turn all 5 string theories, and the M-Theory, upside down on their heads, and effectively disprove the theory.
I think it is infinitely more likely the universe is comprised of multitudes of dimensions, and in fact, I think that since we ourselves, and all known mass around us, is in a 3 dimensional shape, that this research will end up a bogus waste of time. But, I suppose you have to eliminate the obvious to come to the true conclusion.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Water surface can be divided into many dropplets. And these droplets can be divided into another, even much smaller dropplets. After then the string and brane models would obtain a much deeper meaning.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Not quite. For example, water surface is just two dimensional, because surface waves can follow just two mutually perpendicular directions, in which they cannot interfere mutually. We are saying, this surface has two degrees of freedom.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
http://superstrun...age1.gif
By such way, the number of dimensions is apparently related to inertial energy spreading and it can be measured independently.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
If I should adopt your rhetoric literally, I would say, neither you do not exist - just some complex system of fluctuations interacts with electrons at the other end of wire. From more general perspective, you're just strongly asymmetric piece of fractal chaos, by the same way like these electrons and other artifacts.
The most relevant stance will remain somewhere inbetween, as usually.
Feb 03, 2009
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
From issue 2691 of New Scientist magazine
http://www.newsci...ull=true
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
A theory that may be true, may also be not very useful.
Bear with me for a bit and I will explain. Our brains, being macro-things, like to categorize and simplify to aid understanding ( and thereby, survival ). Anyway, this mechanism is more or less the goal of the brain. When we present a method that shows our world ( universe ) in a wildly different manner than what we perceive, we are reluctant to accept.
Now, I am not saying this theory is right. And I am not saying it is wrong. These are often unimportant distinctions. However, is it useful? Asking that question has real value here.
Knowing what is true and false in the universe is all well and good, and I whole-heartedly support the endevor of knowledge-gaining, but we should not discard theories that are "probably not right" because they still may be useful.
If you still have trouble with what I am getting at, think Netownian physics versus relativity. Yes, relativity is "more correct" but Newtonian is still quite useful, which is why it is still taught.
Anyway, I hope this stimulates some thought.
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
By such approach the science would converge into religious camp very fast. Whereas the whole problem is quite simple: the mainstream science missed the point, environment can be never observed by its own waves. So it claimed negative result of M-M experiment as an ultimate proof of nonexistence of such environment, ignoring successfully all other indicias and particle models of reality.
Is not my problem, I'm not guilty for that mistake - so I'd expect some responsible stance from scientific community and the revalidation of Aether model ASAP. Simply because I'm just not willing to pay research based on trivial mistakes from my taxes anymore. Nobody is prohibited to continue in further research of existing theories - just from private sources, please.
I hope, my stance has certain logics at least for someone.
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
We should realize, validity of heliocentric model is based on tautology. It requires a checked gravitational law and known mass of planets at the same moment. But we cannot test one without the another. From pure formal perspective, heliocentric model was never tested by explicit way, as it remains implicit theory.
No wonder, nobody wanted to admit the heliocentric model for Galileo, until independent evidence was found in stellar parallax. From this perspective the Holly Church approach follows the Popper methodology of Mainstream Science very well and nobody can have something against it.
With the only exception, Holly Church has made no mistake in its deductions - whereas Mainstream Science missed the logics of particle environment from its very beginning. By such way, the contemporary scientists are trolling much more by now, then the Holly Church of Galileo era.
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
For example, we can say, the extinction of various species makes no problem for further human evolution: we can synthesize new ones by genetic engineering. But we cannot replace the million years of evolution so easily. What if some extinct strain contains cancer medications, which we are just searching for? Until we cannot travel into past, such lost of information is unrecoverable.
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
From AWT follows, the era of formal and nonformal approach alternates in science in less or more apparent waves, the density of which increases, because of increasing information density. The intuitive Plenum concept of ancient Greeks was replaced by abstract Newtonian concept of absolute space and time. With understanding of wave nature of light Aether theory was revived in 19th century and it was replaced by formal relativity in 20th century. Now we are facing Aether concept again, because the contemporary system of formal QM & GR theories has reached its limits in many aspects, because of its complexity.
For example, Aether concept brings a number of testable predictions concerning the speed of gravity and dispersion of gravitational waves by intuitive way even without any math - as follows from my posts here:
http://www.physor...399.html
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Feb 04, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
This of course may lead into Einstein's utterance that 'I may have got the sign wrong', meaning that gravity is actually a PUSH - and planetary motion calculations do not need their minute fudge factors. Those Fudge factors that physics is so dangerously fond of.
Feb 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
- Space has (omnidirectional) extension.
- Time has duration. It shows (rate of) change of location of matter in space.
We normally consider space to have three essential extensions in three orthogonal (90 degree) directions, but this is a mathematical convenience only. It does not correspond to physical reality as there are no instances of this 90 degree separation of "spatial dimensions" in nature. They only exist in our mathematical model of reality. Also the terms "one dimensional" and "two dimensional" as used today are nowhere to be found in physical reality. If we talk about reality, we only find that there is extension in space, and that it is equally going in all directions. That is the dimension of space.
Just a thought for consideration...
Feb 09, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 02, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 18, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
magpies-have you ever heard of akhems razor? That being that given a set of possibilities, the simplest is usually the case (to put it simply). This ties directly into being "the" common understanding of things in many cases....at least from my perception. Akhems razor has proved to be good many times over....
SteveS-interesting article....I highly doubt thats the case, but interesting none the less :)
Alexa-there are many idiots even on this site that insist that science is nothing mroe than a religion (and I know youve seen them comment too as we comment alot of the same articles)....idiots...but I do agree with your statement for the most part :)
I do have to say though, unless I misunderstood you here: "With the only exception, Holly Church has made no mistake in its deductions - whereas Mainstream Science missed the logics of particle environment from its very beginning"
---- are you defending the church..aka, the first fairy tale writers? I don't think you are but had to ask....btw, the vatican publicly admitted it was wrong and apologized to Galileo not very long ago (maybe a couple months) :)
SexyMolecule-I don't think its a matter of explaining how things really are, but rather, getting the conversations heated and sparked enough to make them intelligent. For every answer, there is 5 arguements :) I GUARANTEE you could post something like 2 2=4, and you will have people saying "no, it's 5", or better yet, saying something like "2 2 is merely a sequence made up by man to explain the reality around him, and counting does not really exist"
:D