Forget the antioxidants? Researchers cast doubt on role of free radicals in aging

February 17, 2009

For more than 40 years, the prevailing explanation of why we get old has been tied to what is called oxidative stress. This theory postulates that when molecules like free radicals, oxygen ions and peroxides build up in cells, they overwhelm the cells’ ability to repair the damage they cause, and the cells age.

An industry of “alternative” antioxidant therapies -- such as Vitamin E or CoQ10 supplements in megadose format --has sprung up as the result of this theory. However, clinical trials have not shown that these treatments have statistically significant effects.

And now researchers at McGill University , in a study published in the February issue of the journal PLoS Genetics, are calling the entire oxidative stress theory into question. Their results show that some organisms actually live longer when their ability to clean themselves of this toxic molecule buildup is partially disabled. Collectively, these molecules are known as reactive oxygen species, or ROS for short.

Dr. Siegfried Hekimi of McGill's Department of Biology, said most of the evidence for the oxidative stress theory is circumstantial, meaning oxidative stress could just as easily be a result of aging as its cause.

“The problem with the theory is that it’s been based purely on correlative data, on the weight of evidence,” explained Hekimi, McGill’s Strathcona Chair of Zoology and Robert Archibald & Catherine Louise Campbell Chair in Developmental Biology. “It is true that the more an organism appears aged, whether in terms of disease, or appearance or anything you care to measure, the more it seems to be suffering from oxidative stress”.

“This has really entrenched the theory,” he continued, “because people think correlation is causation. But now this theory really is in the way of progress.”

Hekimi and postdoctoral fellow Jeremy Van Raamsdonk studied mutant Caenorhabditis elegans worms. They progressively disabled five genes responsible for producing a group of proteins called superoxide dismutases (SODs), which detoxify one of the main ROS. Earlier studies seemed to show that decreased SOD production shortened an organism’s lifespan, but Hekimi and Van Raamsdonk did not observe this. In fact, they found quite the opposite.

None of their mutant worms showed decreased lifespan compared to wild-type worms, even though oxidative stress was clearly raised. In fact, one variety actually displayed increased lifespan, the researchers said.

“The mutation that increases longevity affects the main SOD found in mitochondria inside the animals’ cells,” said Hekimi. “This is consistent with earlier findings that mitochondria are crucial to the aging process. It seems that reducing mitochondrial activity by damaging it with ROS will actually make worms live longer.”

The researchers hasten to point out that they are not suggesting that oxidative stress is good for you.

“ROS undoubtedly cause damage to the body,” Hekimi said. “However, they do not appear to be responsible for aging.”

More information: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000361

Provided by McGill University


   
Rate this story - 4.5 /5 (10 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • deatopmg - Feb 17, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    BFD - this is for a nematode worm. higher forms of life show the opposite effect.
  • taisha99 - Feb 18, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Its a WORM ! and a simple one at that
  • ZeroDelta - Feb 18, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I am less concerned with anitoxidants and aging as opposed to dmamage to DNA, RNA and cell funtion, as stated in the article.
  • Keter - Feb 18, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I'm not giving up my antioxidant routine (which works) based on this: there are worms that thrive in the toxic environments around volcanic fumaroles, too - does that mean I should live downwind of a toxic smokestack? (insert gutteral sound of disgust here)
  • holmstar - Feb 18, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    animals also tend to live longer when their metabolism is reduced. Seems pretty likely that damaging the mitochondria would have a negative effect on metabolism, thus we get the same result of lower metabolism = longer life.

February 17, 2009 all stories

Comments: 5

4.5 /5 (10 votes)

  • hide
  • Related Stories



Other News

Scientists crash test DNA's replication machinery

Biology / Cell & Microbiology

created 1hour ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

(PhysOrg.com) -- Important molecular machines routinely crash into one another while plying their trades on DNA. New research shows that the enzymes that copy DNA before cell division, called replisomes, are the kings of ...


giant oarfish

Bizarre giant oarfish filmed (w/ Video)

Biology / Plants & Animals

created 2 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

(PhysOrg.com) -- A rare giant oarfish, probably the largest bony fish in the ocean, has been filmed off the Gulf of Mexico. This is possibly the first time the fish has been observed in its natural environment.


Benefits of badger culling not long lasting for reducing cattle TB, says study

Benefits of badger culling not long lasting for reducing cattle TB, says study

Biology / Ecology

created 1hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- Badger culling is unlikely to be a cost-effective way of helping control cattle TB in Britain, according to research published today in PLoS ONE.


Scientists release Key Largo wood rats in first test of restocking experiment

Biology / Ecology

created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

The seven pioneers spent the week preparing for their upcoming ordeal in North Key Largo, sampling berries and other local fare, redecorating homes with sticks, leaves and whatever else they got their little paws on, and ...


Great tits: birds with character

Great tits: birds with character

Biology / Plants & Animals

created 15 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 3 | with audio podcast

(PhysOrg.com) -- In humans and animals alike, individuals differ in sets of traits that we usually refer to as personality. An important part of the individual difference in personality is due to variation ...