Link between unexploded munitions in oceans and cancer-causing toxins determined
February 18, 2009 by Anisa S. Jimenez
During a research trip to Puerto Rico, ecologist James Porter took samples from underwater nuclear bomb target USS Killen, expecting to find evidence of radioactive matter - instead he found a link to cancer. Data revealed that the closer corals and marine life were to unexploded bombs from the World War II vessel and the surrounding target range, the higher the rates of carcinogenic materials.
"Unexploded bombs are in the ocean for a variety of reasons - some were duds that did not explode, others were dumped in the ocean as a means of disposal," said Porter. "And we now know that these munitions are leaking cancer-causing materials and endangering sea life."
These findings will be presented at the Second International Dialogue on Underwater Munitions on February 25-27 in Honolulu. Data has been gathered since 1999 on the eastern end of the Isla de Vieques, Puerto Rico - a land and sea area that was used as a naval gunnery and bombing range from 1943-2003. Research revealed that marine life including reef-building corals, feather duster worms and sea urchins closest to the bomb and bomb fragments had the highest levels of toxicity. In fact, carcinogenic materials were found in concentrations up to 100,000 times over established safe limits. This danger zone covered a span of up to two meters from the bomb and its fragments.
According to research conducted in Vieques, residents here have a 23% higher cancer rate than do Puerto Rican mainlanders. Porter said a future step will be "to determine the link from unexploded munitions to marine life to the dinner plate."
While Porter believes every nation with a coastline has problems with unexploded munitions, there is a solution.
"With the creation of the Ordinance Recovery System, we now have a way to safely remove unexploded munitions," he said.
The machine picks up unexploded bombs off the sea floor and delivers them safely to a lift basket for surface disposal or deep sea burial. It is operated remotely with proportional toggle switches that allow much more fine control of the delicate undersea operation than an on/off button. The system relies on an underwater hydraulic system designed James Barton, president of Underwater Ordinance Recovery, Inc., with the technical expertise of machinists at the UGA instrument shop.
"When you remove the bomb, you remove the problem - but you've got to pick it up," said Porter.
Source: University of Georgia
Nov 02, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
I'd look for the link to higher cancer rates elsewhere...
So if someone puts a small garbage dump near your home, no problem right? Cuz our atmosphere is even MORE HUGE than the oceans! Couldn't possibly affect you or make you sick, could it?
So you kept your job at the EPA even with the change of administration, did you?
Yeah it does, I'm glad you got the point.
Probably not from the smell, no. If things were leaching into the ground water and staying still then quite possibly.
But then we're talking about different mediums here aren't we.
You see apples are red shiny things, and oranges are orange and textured....
No I've never had a workfare job in my life, but if your interested I'm under the impression all you have to do to get on there under the current administration is flap your arms about and squawk at the top of your lungs that the sky is falling...
Indeed and since we aren't given these facts, or other pertinent ones like concentration levels at various USEFUL (as opposed to two METERS) distances from said munitions, or the levels necessary to pose a significant health risk to humans at those USEFUL distances makes the article basically useLESS...actually worse than useless.
Jason
www.earth-intelligence.net
http://twitter.co...intelnet
If you pay for it you got a deal, otherwise count me out.
those old battleships carried over a megaton of H.E.
BOOM!
Yeah really stupid to want to know how concentrated these eeewwwvviiiiilll particulates are more than TWO METERS away from right on top of them...pfft...
On a different note, I have a strange hypothetical question (I'd imagine its been discussed somewhere). Could the ocean be used (once again) to dispose of nuclear waste, but instead of in piles or dumps, evenly dispersed into the entire ocean? I'm curious what levels of radiation you would get if you could magically evenly disperse all the world's nuclear waste evenly into all the oceans. Not that Im suggesting it, I just think its interesting to think about.